patrick.net

HunterTits says

As for State, so what? That is a state matter.

You can't have the States do whatever they want because their actions affect federal elections. This idea that the States can cheat, break the law, etc. without the Feds getting involved is false.

I'm trying to grasp the position, but I'm having some trouble. There are distinctions parsing treason (civilian courts?), sedition (kind of like treason plus) and insurrection (military intervention against invasion, arms, or some combination):
"In the case of an actual insurrection, organized political
society is in extremis; the situation is tantamount to war. In
such circumstances, it is necessary and appropriate for the government to employ force which is distinctively military in character. It was only in such extreme situations-foreign invasion
and genuine insurrection-and never in cases of mere riot or
civil disorder, that the English tradition which the founding
fathers endeavored to preserve permitted the domestic application of distinctively military force;"
Foundations for Military Intervention in the United States

Is it in the eye of the beholder that foreign intervention in the elections has been clearly stated although it has already been confirmed by the report? Are states entitled to any degree of corrupting influence, including foreign interference and election fraud, or violations of their own and federal constitutions, to their heart's content without it being regarded as treason or insurrection? If the courts are clearly captured and have failed as part of the general civil infiltration and fraud, does this mean the military stands by and is obligated to become subject to the fraud as well and the civilian authorities emplaced that way?

Yes, the military is the last resort, but with the rampant and clear corruption of the media and the Feds, I think the criterion have been met. They have used the term war more than once, albeit 'asymmetric war' based on infiltration rather than direct military assault.

Even if Trump lost it would be nice to have a quick, clean, transparent, election process.

We should know who won the presidential election in each state by election midnight, not after the ballots from under the table are counted at 3 in the morning.

Right. Most Trump supporters, including me, would've easily moved on if he legitimately lost. There was WAY too much smoke and fire that couldn't be ignored.

HunterTits says

despite the fact that the victim was ga ng raped in front of a busy ice cream truck in full view traumatized kids.

And the supreme court ignored it.

If they decided they weren't gang raped in front of a busy ice crime truck: "Filed too late. Should have filed before the gang rape. No Standing"

The fact that the courts would not review the merits of the cases and shirked their duty by claiming the plaintiffs had “no standing” is proof that team Trump was ill prepared and outmaneuvered by the globalists thugs, or that the globalists thugs run the courts, or maybe both are true.

HunterTits says

Pennsylvania's legislature didn't do jack shit to stop the Secretary of State and other Dems from doing what they did, that is the same as acquiesing to it.

Agreed, so the question is, if the legislature fails to do its job and thereby disenfranchised a majority of Pennsylvania voters, don’t the people of Pennsylvania have legal standing to have their votes be counted and all fraudulent votes discarded? Should not the perpetrators of the fraud be held accountable? The state legislature is not the victim of fraud, the voters and the candidate are the victims.

Well, I'm radicalized enough.

porkchopexpress says

Is it gay that I get sexually aroused fantasizing about this?

No...Remember, the gay test is if a guy touches it and it moves.

ThreeBays says

fake lies

as opposed to genuine lies that are usually perpetrated by the Left

Rb6d says

ThreeBays says

fake lies

as opposed to genuine lies that are usually perpetrated by the Left

lol

PeopleUnited says

The fact that the courts would not review the merits of the cases and shirked their duty by claiming the plaintiffs had “no standing” is proof that team Trump was ill prepared and outmaneuvered by the globalists thugs, or that the globalists thugs run the courts, or maybe both are true.

Unpopular opinion - while it seemed wise at the time, Trump should have declared martial law and an insurrection during the Summer of Urban Guerillas.

Then taken photo ops outside all the destroyed Minnesota shops and Portland stormed Police Stations to shove it in people's faces. And even take away the power of the Media to apologize and promote them.

I think we're getting to a point that if we have power, Optics won't matter, the power will have to be exercised. If people don't get it now, they won't ever.