by Ceffer ➕follow (5) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last » Search these comments
If a state refuses to audit on its own, then the military can enforce the audits?
Interesting if true.
Is it gay that I get sexually aroused fantasizing about this?
Where are you getting the idea that the military has any authority in this area? Even if they did, they are under direct control of the President and SecDef.
Where are you getting the idea that the military has any authority in this area? Even if they did, they are under direct control of the President and SecDef.
Military's oath is to protect the Constitution and the citizenry,
Yes, if so, then the US would have actually won the Vietnam War, instead of it turning into a decade long shit show.
The question is how much integrity our military officers have.
defending the resource-rich areas of Indonesia, Malaya (and Brunei) that are essentially islands (Malay peninsula has a very narrow strip to the north)
Sending in US platoons, into the fields/jungles of South Vietnam, just to be assaulted and have 'em call in for air strikes, wasn't a plan.
Check your facts. Any plane the President is on, including a Cessna, gets the call sign Air Force One or Marine One. I would bet that whatever plane Biden flew to the G-7 meeting on had the call sign "Air Force One."
The correct strategy was to force Land Redistribution to Villagers, and create rugged individualist farmers, and arm them to the teeth and train them in calling in air and arty support.
watch Monkey Werx on You Tube and go back to his previous episodes. He tracks military and political planes a couple of times a week.
How much of this is fake news for hopium addicts? He seems to be pretty thorough.
Thailand was already there for that and since the US had a long standing base at the northeast, Ubon, this would never have become a problem.
Why do you think Biden has been traveling around in mothballed beaters trussed up to look like AF1 but has never to date had an AF1 call sign on his planes?
Or plants by lefties to discredit Conservatives, to dilute the credibility for when actual issues are brought up.
There were / had been very active communist revolutionary activities in Indonesia and Malaysia
Before you talk about Biden's beater planes, you should check out Trump's personal 757. It is currently sitting in some upstate NY airport with a missing jet engine. CNN did a story on it a few months ago complete with pictures. I hope Trump likes flying commercial...
HeadSet saysCeffer, you're giving me an erection. I'm not gay.Where are you getting the idea that the military has any authority in this area? Even if they did, they are under direct control of the President and SecDef.
Military's oath is to protect the Constitution and the citizenry, not the Federal Government. They are the fall back when the Fed has gone completely corrupt, as it has, the elections are stolen, and foreign powers have taken over the politicians, as they have. DoD in its strictest sense is advisory.
Why do you think Biden has been traveling around in mothballed beaters trussed up to look like AF1 but has never to date had an AF1 call sign on his planes? Why does Trump still have military transport and Trump says the military is preparing a nice jet for him for his future rallies? Trump's executive orders about foreign interference in the elections cannot be cancelled until the military says so, and they haven't said so.
I, of course, don't know. Some of it resides in the murkiness of whether Trump signed the Insurrection Act, which could have remained a secret and does not expire until it is declared to expire. We are still in a 'state of emergency' from 9/11, and they have never lifted it. Many commentators have said that the military plays a role when the civilian government is irreversibly corrupted. I believe that that is a credible position. Whether it would ever come to fruition as in Myanmar or with Abraham Lincoln's actions is another speculation.As we've said before, it could be that the military is waiting for the audits to play out so that the populace can accept a removal of President or transfer of power. Otherwise, it would only be seen as a military coup.
It's almost like saying that if you get away with election fraud, that once you have gotten away with it, there is no recourse to reverse it, so the criminal ends really do justify the means. Seizing the Presidency through overt fraud and foreign manipulation is not an actionable offense in any meaningful way. It also means that the military merely 'stands down' when a corrupt transfer of power takes place in the Presidency. There is quite...
Yes, I've heard, however, General Suharto of Indonesia maimed many of the communists in the archipelago back in '67, establishing himself as a pro-western dictator.
And apparently, he reigned from '67 to '97 with an iron fist w/o much opposition. Now, contrast that with Cambodia and Laos, where the Khmer Rouge and the Pathet Lao exacted a mass genocide on the population during the late 70s. Though everyone knows about the Cambodian 'Killing Fields', a lot of ppl don't know that the Pathet Lao did the same to some 300K Laotians.
Me 5 years ago:
"Ah, X is crazy, Y will never happen, Z is impossible. ABC will never happen. D won't happen here. E? In America? C'mon man!"
Me today: "Who the fuck knows, it's possible"
We can't blame those typical communist atrocities on American intervention
STATES run the elections, not the Feds. And the military is the Feds.
It does not strike me that there is no military option
A State can not be held to be in insurrection for exercising power granted to it by the Constution.
Comments 1 - 40 of 53 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,202,224 comments by 14,262 users - mell, Patrick online now