by Patrick ➕follow (49) 💰tip ($1.87 in tips) ignore
« First « Previous Comments 485 - 524 of 567 Next » Last »
I want to give everyone to a chance to review this 446 page document and make up your own minds - before people in the media do it for you. I am looking forward to discovering what you find!
(Why is it redacted?)
1 hr ago
i am just a kitten and not terribly savvy on politics, but i kinda think that maybe if “those who defrauded the american people should face prosecution” is a radical right wing idea that probably i can see why so few people seem to trust the left anymore…
i mean, "if people find out about the things we did, they are gonna to be super angry at us so no one should be allowed to tell the truth" is not much of a mantra for "the side of science" is it?
Wall Street Silver
Did Fauci fund gain of function research at the Wuhan lab?
Let's review the statements and evidence. 🔥🔥🔥
"The worst possible thing you could do is to vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually make them worse." - Tony Fauci.
Locking him up would be a pretty mild punishment for killing more than six million people by approving and funding illegal virus research.
“We have previously presented materials confirming the involvement of Hunter Biden and his Rosemont Seneca Foundation, as well as other US Democratic Party-controlled entities, in funding the Pentagon's main contractors operating in Ukraine.
It has been shown how deeply the son of the current US president, Hunter Biden, is involved in funding the US DOD-controlled company Metabiota.
However, some participants in closed projects remain in the shadows, although they are key players in Ukraine's military-biological programme.
They include former DITRA director Kenneth Myers, executive vice president of the CIA-controlled In-Q-Tel venture capital fund Tara O'Toole, former head of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Thomas Frieden, former the National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins, former Battelle Memorial Institute executive director Jeffrey Wadsworth, chief scientist and president of international research, development and medicine at Pfizer and many others.
All of them, in one way or another, are beneficiaries of the Pentagon's biological projects and are linked to the US Democratic Party, whose leaders act as the masterminds of military- biological research and the creators of covert money-laundering schemes to benefit a narrow circle of US elites.
It is these people who should be asked why taxpayers' money is being spent on illegal military-biological research in Ukraine and other countries around the world.” ...
“Despite formal bans, the US budget is being spent on dual-use research. In this connection, the Republican Party has initiated an investigation into the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and President Biden's chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci. Public funding through an intermediary organisation was confirmed for experiments to enhance the pathogenicity of viruses, including coronaviruses, the incidence of which was not widespread until 2019.
The investigation found that Fauci openly lied and deliberately concealed US government involvement in the research programmes.
At the same time, his collusion with social media management to manipulate public opinion on the causes of COVID-19 was revealed.
Such revelations raise legitimate questions for the US about the causes of new human-caused pathogens and the patterns of pandemic spread.”
Tony Fauci expresses concerns about the long-term effects of an AIDS vaccine.
FAUCI: "You take it, and a year goes by...Then you find out that it takes twelve years for all hell to break loose."
Question: the last time the DoD worked with the EcoHealth Alliance, 6 million people died. So if the DoD considers that project a success, then what exactly would a failed project look like? Are there any circumstances under which DoD would consider NOT contracting with EcoHealth Alliance?
NYC Protesters Crash Fauci Event, Call For Arrest Of ‘Murderer’ Over Lockdowns & Jabs
'Knew Covid had been engineered to make it infectious to humans but were told to shut-up'
... Whilst looking closely for these features it became immediately obvious that this virus was extremely unlikely to have come from a bat, even via another animal, as it had inserts around the receptor binding region and - a feature not present on any similar virus - that would make it more infectious.
Moreover, these features had been previously published by researchers in Wuhan, which was the largest coronavirus research laboratory in the world.
We, therefore, concluded that the chances that this virus was not natural but had escaped from the laboratory were extremely high and pointed out that SARS-1 had escaped from high-security laboratories on over six occasions since its isolation.
We wrote a manuscript and shared it with the Government, Cabinet and scientific advisors saying that it was extremely likely that this was a laboratory escape and had clear and present security implications. Imagine our surprise when we were told quite categorically that there was no way it could have been a laboratory escape and was a natural zoonosis. We tried to publish this on many occasions and each and every one of the top journals, including Nature, Science, The Lancet and many others refused to publish this as it was not in the public interest.
What was to follow was a complete suppression of any debate about the origin, which would appear to have been driven by Tony Fauci from the NIAID in America. ...
What was incredible was that this narrative was picked by governments throughout the world, all the mainstream media and the majority of scientists, who should have known better than to accept the narrative rather than look at the evidence. ...
Now, more than two years later, two of the people involved with this, Professor Colin Butler from Australia and Delia Randolph from the University of Greenwich, London, have spoken out that it is clear now that all the evidence DOES support a lab leak and that there has been a suppression of the truth.
There has been secrecy and cover-up of this issue on a truly Orwellian scale. ...
This failure to engage with a different mindset of eminent scientists and clinicians at this time has probably cost the UK Government at least a trillion pounds, given the long-lasting disastrous legacy of lockdown on everything from education, mental health and misdiagnosis leading to early deaths from cardiac and other diseases, such as cancer. ...
The British Government in the early days of the pandemic repeatedly said they were following the science. This, for me, has to be one of the greatest lies ever told to the British people as there was no science involved in this at all. ...
Covid is a respiratory virus and lockdown should never have been entertained. The only time for lockdown is for a highly infectious disease, such as Ebola, and it was clear from the beginning we were NOT dealing with an agent that kills 70 percent of the people it infects.
What lessons have we learnt from this? Essentially none, but in future any new threat, infectious disease or pandemic must be addressed with open scientific debate and not the complete suppression of the truth, secrecy and coverup which unfortunately George Orwell foresaw as far back at 1948 as a possible dystopian terrifying future.
« First « Previous Comments 485 - 524 of 567 Next » Last »
This is perhaps the greatest crime against humanity ever committed by a small group of people: Fauci, Daszak, and the Bat-lady in Wuhan.
There should be nothing else in the headlines, only this.
Fauci has a long history of funding gain-of-function research to facilitate the creation of viruses which can be used to sell vaccines for large profits.
Anyone who has read a decent mystery novel will see the means, motive, and opportunity were all there. It's obvious in retrospect.
Until Fauci is in jail, we are all in danger of his doing it again, and again, and again, or having some minion like Daszak do it. Why is there no official investigation going on?