« First « Previous Comments 118 - 157 of 835 Next » Last » Search these comments
No Bats or Pangolins Sold in Wuhan Wet Market: Oxford Research
BY LILY ZHOU June 8, 2021
Neither bats nor pangolins were being sold in Wet Markets in Wuhan when the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic started, a study by Oxford University found.
I think that happened about the same time their endowment mysteriously surged to more than a hundred million dollars.
The Wikipedia has sadly been corrupted to the point where it is not useful for anything political - all of those articles are overt propaganda now,
Are you only recognizing this now?
‘So, I will say this — and I honestly mean this — I think we owe a great debt of gratitude to science,’ he said. ‘Science has, in many ways, helped ease the suffering of this pandemic, which was more than likely caused by science.’
‘Oh my God, there’s a novel respiratory coronavirus overtaking Wuhan, China, what do we do? Oh, you know who we could ask? The Wuhan novel respiratory coronavirus lab. The disease is the same name as the lab. That’s just a little too weird!’ ...
But we all know that Jon Stewart would never have dared voice the Wuhan lab leak theory, which he now regards as so blindingly obvious, on television last year. That would have actually taken courage. Back then, the idea was widely dismissed as fake infodemic news, Trumpist drivel put about by Steve Bannon and other right-wing post-truthers. The lab leak theory wasn’t something you could say in polite company even in the early months this year, even after the State Department had released official intelligence suggesting connections between the lab, the virus, and China’s illegal bioweapons program. That was all Donald Trump and Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo’s State Department, so it had to be ignored.
In recent weeks, however, a growing number of respectable scientists and writers and publications have begun to agree that the theory is more than plausible. It may even be, as Stewart suggests, likely.
The woke have obliterated our nation's ability to critically think and respond to crises:
Scientist Backing Probe Into Wuhan Lab: Some Peers Delayed Probing Lab Theory Because They Didn’t Want ‘To Be Associated With Trump’...
NOT BEING ASSOCIATED WITH TRUMP WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN UNCOVERING THE TRUTH OF A VIRUS THAT'S KILLED MILLIONS WORLDWIDE AND THE MACHINATIONS OF AN ORWELLIAN REGIME THAT ENSLAVES A BILLION PEOPLE.
in my own little world a death and several extremely severe extended illnesses and reactions. I imagine Kaiser is seeing quite a few bad outcomes, they have already changed the vaccine they use, but they are covering it up like everybody else.
I don't know personally know anyone who died of Wuhan Virus, but now you and I know people who were murdered by Fauci via his "vaccine".
The 'silver or the bullet' fiat money pouring into this fraud is amazing, as is the rank cowardice of the people we are supposed to be able to trust. Decades of credibility flushed and burned up in a short time for the psychopaths to reach their goals, turning scientists and doctors into useful idiots along with MSM.
Google funded research conducted by Peter Daszak, a controversial British scientist credited for the online silencing of the theory that COVID-19 virus leaked from a lab. Google claims the research it funded was not related to COVID-19.
It was a letter organized by Daszak that was used by Facebook as the basis of its censorship of the lab hypothesis.
As revealed by The National Pulse, Google’s charity arm, Google.org, funded several scientific studies co-authored by Daszak between 2010 and 2018.
Google’s charity arm, Google.org, funded several scientific studies co-authored by Daszak between 2010 and 2018.
The sudden shift in narrative over the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a lab in Wuhan, China, is mysterious and is evidence of “just how corrupt our system has become,” according to evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein. ...
“My channel was very early on this topic, and it was quite clear to many of us, starting with the tremendous coincidence of this virus having emerged first in Wuhan, where there is a biosafety level four lab studying these very viruses and enhancing them,” said Weinstein. “It was quite clear that there was at least a viable hypothesis that needed to be discussed.
Weinstein, a visiting fellow at the James Madison Program at Princeton University, said that before the narrative surrounding the COVID-19 lab leak theory gained traction, those who did discuss it were stigmatized, demonized and “portrayed as everything from racist to reactionary.”
“All we were doing was following the evidence,” Weinstein continued. “The change in that story was, I have to say, completely mysterious.”
While the theory that the virus was the result of a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was labeled a “conspiracy theory” last year, it has recently gained traction as a growing number of scientists and officials have lent credence to the hypothesis.
COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, was first reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan.
A January State Department fact sheet raised questions about whether the outbreak could have been the result of a lab accident at WIV. It said the United States has “reason to believe” that several WIV researchers became sick with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses in autumn 2019. The department also said the lab had been conducting secret military experiments on animals since at least 2017, and that it has a history of conducting gain-of-function research on viruses. Such research involves modifying viruses to have new or enhanced capabilities. ...
Weinstein criticized the explanations provided in recent weeks by “all of those who had gotten the story wrong” after the lab leak theory gained wider recognition.
PolitiFact, for example, on May 24 quietly retracted a September 2020 fact check that labeled a Hong Kong virologist’s claim that COVID-19 originated in a lab as inaccurate and a “debunked conspiracy theory.”
“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous,” the now-archived fact check previously said. “We rate it Pants on Fire!” ...
Separately, the Washington Post quietly walked back its claims regarding the COVID-19 lab leak theory.
The paper in February 2020 published an article claiming the idea was a “conspiracy theory” that had been “debunked.” The article attacked Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who called for an investigation into the origins of the CCP virus.
*Some reporters have said that they disregarded the lab leak theory because Republicans were largely the ones promoting the idea.*
Weinstein described the phenomenon as “a headlong rush, by all of those who had gotten the story wrong to explain themselves—and their explanations made less than no sense.”
He said that certain journalists or media outlets “seemed to center on the fact that because [former President] Donald Trump had been favorable to the idea that this might have emerged from a lab, that that made it not true.”
“Which, of course, is such an illogical conclusion that it’s hard to imagine how anybody who considers himself a journalist could for a moment have been misled,” he continued. “I mean, at worst, if you thought everything that Donald Trump said was a lie—at worst, you would have to take it as no evidence either way.
“But that’s not how people treated it. They treated it almost as if the truth was always the opposite of what he said.”
Other outlets have also corrected or quietly updated stories, including Vox, while Facebook stopped banning posts suggesting the virus was man-made.
Weinstein said that he believes it eventually became “impossible to maintain the public lie that a laboratory version was somehow in conflict with the evidence.”
“And we now know from Dr. Fauci, his emails, that behind the scenes, the top people didn’t believe it either. They were just simply feeding the public a line that they had their own reasons for wanting the public to believe,” he said.
“I do have hope. But it is contingent on the several different stories that surround COVID revealing to us just how corrupt our system has become.”
Another theory:
"Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?"
https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavirus-a-biowarfare-attack-against-china/
Karloff saysAnother theory:
"Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?"
https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavirus-a-biowarfare-attack-against-china/
Looks like a propaganda attempt to make China the "victim" and not the perp. Now that the "wet market" lie is getting exposed, here is an attempt to say the West developed the bug and hit Wuhan with it.
Therefore, it usually takes several years to design a vaccine prototype and then develop new vaccines. However, China seemed to be very familiar with the development of this vaccine.
It is common knowledge that vaccine prototypes used in clinical trials must first be developed over a lengthy time. The Pfizer vaccine began research and development on March 20, 2020 and it took them at least four months to produce a feasible prototype; Chinese state media reported the Sinopharm vaccine began its R&D on Jan. 19, 2020, and started clinical trials on April 12 in the same year.
Sinopharm was faster at creating a vaccine than Pfizer, which implies that the CCP was prepared for a pandemic before it all began, including getting a head start on the vaccine.
Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.
Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).
Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.
First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.
Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process — a process known as the P3 framework.
Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus “looked…engineered” and seemed to be “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”
« First « Previous Comments 118 - 157 of 835 Next » Last » Search these comments
This is perhaps the greatest crime against humanity ever committed by a small group of people: Fauci, Daszak, and the Bat-lady in Wuhan.
https://patrick.net/post/1339251/2021-05-16-incredibly-long-detailed-evidence-that
There should be nothing else in the headlines, only this.
Fauci has a long history of funding gain-of-function research to facilitate the creation of viruses which can be used to sell vaccines for large profits.
Anyone who has read a decent mystery novel will see the means, motive, and opportunity were all there. It's obvious in retrospect.
Until Fauci is in jail, we are all in danger of his doing it again, and again, and again, or having some minion like Daszak do it. Why is there no official investigation going on?
As RFK Jr. put it: "A $200 billion enterprise would’ve collapsed if Fauci had admitted that Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were effective against covid." https://twitter.com/DiedSuddenly/status/1685830247139168256