patrick.net

AD says

Someone like Soros funds left wing and AntiFa-style militant groups that pressure these corporations to have over representation of minorities from the middle to the top levels. Soros then shorts the stock of these companies.

I don't think this is just about money. Google has a lot more money than Soros does.

I suspect this is an outside attack and our intelligence agencies being the traitors they are, or possibly incompetents, are looking the other way, but I don't think they are this incompetent. I've seen them cover up too many crimes. They protected Jeffrey Epstein, and that's the LEAST of their criminal activity.

richwicks says

I suspect this is an outside attack and our intelligence agencies being the traitors they are, or possibly incompetents, are looking the other way

Yes, Chicoms fingerprints are all over this. They exploit our weaknesses and we are hapless in regards to this.

Democrats at best are ambivalent, whereas a lot welcome this as authoritarian state or Orwellian sympathizers.

.

Asians are White Adjacent because they disprove the 'lack of achievement is due to racism' narrative.

Patrick says

AD says

This is why Democrats like all kinds of immigrants.

I’m surprised the split is 51/42 for Vietnamese. I thought it would be closer to 70/30 or even 80/20. It makes sense as the older generation dies off while it’s being replenished with the younger generations who grow up here.

AD says

Democrats at best are ambivalent

So I have been using the word ambivalent in that context probably since I learned the word but recently found out that it's wrong. I think you mean, "Democrats don't care either way", but's not what that means. That means, "Democrats care both ways in a conflicting way"...

No, I'm not a grammar nazi... I just notice that a lot nowadays.

"Ambivalence is a state of having simultaneous conflicting reactions, beliefs, or feelings towards some object. Stated another way, ambivalence is the experience of having an attitude towards someone or something that contains both positively and negatively valenced components."

just_passing_through says

AD says

Democrats at best are ambivalent

So I have been using the word ambivalent in that context probably since I learned the word but recently found out that it's wrong. I think you mean, "Democrats don't care either way", but's not what that means. That means, "Democrats care both ways in a conflicting way"...

You are misunderstanding what I wrote. Read it again.

The best case scenario as far as the US national security and sovereignty, the Democrats have contradictory views of the Chicoms. They are not as much as ideologically against the Chicoms like the Republicans are.

Hence, the Democrats at best are ambivalent towards the Chicoms.
.