patrick.net

Because blacks are too fucking lazy to do the commute.

BLM is mostly rich white liberals.

They wouldn't have to commute at all.

They don’t attack their bosses

Patrick says

BLM is mostly rich white liberals.

They wouldn't have to commute at all.

They go wherever the organizers paid by Open Society Foundation tells them to go.

Booger says

Because blacks are too fucking lazy to do the commute.

Booger is probably right, Occam's razor.

https://guides.library.harvard.edu/hua/soc113

This time they did in NYC. They got to SOHO and 6th avenue in NYC.

I live near Trenton, NJ which is so shitty it looks like downtown Baghdad. They looted Trenton the first night but were shut down pretty quickly (funny how with no media standing in the way acting as human shields how fast this got put down). Well, the next night, me and 3 adjacent towns were put under curfew because they planned on targeting our towns. But with a curfew in place (and no protestors), they weren't able to. I listened to the police band the entire night. The looters had scouts scouting out all the strip malls. But the police were able to go to them immediately and chase them away because of curfew. Funny how without "peaceful protestors" violating curfew, you can't loot.

Nearby, there is an uber rich town, Princeton. It's literally impossible for them to come in. They have a choke point at the main road in that they would have to cross. They would have been arrested immediately. Rich white liberals are have had NIMBY procedures in place for decades. That's why they held at 500 person 9 minute kneel in Princeton. They are all guilty of being racists and they know it....so they have to try to convince themselves that they are not racist.

I was present for a riot in the 90s when I was in 6th grade. It was the MTV sports festival in Belmar, NJ. Kriss Kross was scheduled to perform. Bill Bellamy and Dan Cortez were there. Super soakers were all the rage. There was a group of women who set up a table selling supersoakers. Well, the black people there bought them, went over to the next store and bought bleach. They started firing bleach onto the crowd from the Boardwalk and it was an instant riot. It happened so damn quick. There were no signs of unrest prior to that. Of course, they announce over the PA that the performance is cancelled and that just fueled it even more. The funniest part about it was that the neighboring town, Avon, which is fairly wealthy, the first thing they did was raise the drawbridge that connected to Belmar so they couldn't spill over.

I've lived in crime infested areas for 1/3 of my life. Only a closet racist would feel the need to mourn the death of a career criminal, apologize for it, and organize a protest in the safest part of town. None of these rich white liberal protesters will set foot in the ghetto.

https://nypost.com/2023/09/06/harvard-is-named-worst-school-for-free-speech-scoring-zero-out-of-possible-100/

Harvard is named worst school for free speech — scoring zero out of possible 100

The Ivies are returning to their roots, aka, a separate university internally for the handshake societies, dynastics and elites with 'secret' knowledge and technologies, and the 'NASCAR' brand name sticker aspiration for the deluded meritocracy applicants whose job is to toe the line for standardized knowledges and mendacious histories designed for the consumption of the masses. Talented and compliant technocrats, lawyers, business types etc. may gain admission to an intermediate layer of functionaries and apparatchiks.

What 'free speech' challenges is what they want to hide.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

They go wherever the organizers paid by Open Society Foundation tells them to go.

Exactly.

Ceffer says

The Ivies are returning to their roots, aka, a separate university internally for the handshake societies, dynastics and elites with 'secret' knowledge and technologies, and the 'NASCAR' brand name sticker aspiration for the deluded meritocracy applicants whose job is to toe the line for standardized knowledges and mendacious histories designed for the consumption of the masses. Talented and compliant technocrats, lawyers, business types etc. may gain admission to an intermediate layer of functionaries and apparatchiks.

Let me point out that competence keeps society running, not credentials.

We are at an inflection point, like the USSR had.

If they wanted to inject the population with a vaccine that did whatever, they would have created an actual disease that actually was dangerous. They failed at that. With a disease that was actually a threat, the propaganda box would have been able to convince people to get an injection that actually stopped transmission - they would have been consistent and credible with it. They failed with that. If the vaccine was intended to kill, it would kill, and with a near 100% vaccination rate, nobody would have known it was the vaccine. They failed with that.

Perhaps the refusal to accept competent people into the system, has doomed the oligarchy. Have you considered that?

I do not think this "pandemic" went as planned, at all.

I fall into the trap myself that the people at the top are "really smart, very competent" - more likely, I'm vastly over-estimating them. I over-estimate the general population after all. Who would have thought people would believe "the unvaccinated pose a threat to the vaccinated"? - but I've seen this myself. I was barred from a house because I wasn't vaccinated. Her husband's father is a PhD biologist, and HE believed it. How can he not understand the BASIC biology I know? He doesn't!!!!!

I'm finding out that a "jack of all trades, a master of none" is extremely rare. Polymaths are incredibly rare. I'm a very stupid polymath, and a jack of all trades, a master of none. Then I worry about the Dunning-Kruger Effect, and wonder where I'm in that. This is my source of self doubt.

I always think I have more to learn, because I think I'm stupid in everything other than my specific field. If I don't do this, I will conclude I have nothing left to learn, no matter how much I know. I need to retain my feeling of ignorance.

Two lawyers who famously drew weapons on BLM thugs lived in an upscale gated community, didn't they?

https://anarchonomicon.substack.com/p/short-take-abolish-section-8

Americans debate housing like mad and wring their hands at young people unable to afford or even rent in major, economically relevant metro areas...

Yet they don't talk about the program systematically destroying neighborhoods, rendering vast swathes of those metros unlivable, and consuming vast amounts of housing that could be occupied by hard-working working productive young people... but is instead being occupied by criminals, drug dealers, and people who sexually abuse their children and those of others.

Section 8 housing.

Every major American city, even the most expensive, has massive sacrifice zones where housing and rents collapse in value, little circles of what on a map might look like affordability, but in reality, are hellish neighborhoods filled with people who disproportionately don't work and bounce in and out of prison and hospital consuming massive amounts of taxpayer resources and rendering massive areas around wherever they are unlivable for normal decent human life.

Families, young women, and even men of a suitably unfrightening demeanor cannot live in these neighborhoods, in what should be some of the most expensive real estate in the world in easy access to major metro areas, often walking distance to important downtowns and job opportunities...

Why do Americans tolerate this!?

One key to understanding these very bad neighborhoods next to very expensive neighborhoods is that the rich need someplace for their servants to live.

If the neighborhood were not so bad, then the rich would have to do without their servants, or would have to pay much more for those services. Both are unacceptable to the rich.

And so the rich actually want very bad neighborhoods nearby, and have a motive to encourage all kinds of violence and crime there, so that they can pay low wages to their servants.

Patrick says

And so the rich actually want very bad neighborhoods nearby, and have a motive to encourage all kinds of violence and crime there, so that they can pay low wages to their servants.

Same reason applies to illegals. Don't even have to pay taxes.

Those neighborhoods are funding the mayhem. The intent is to psychologically abuse poor blacks. It's in Democrats DNA, going all the way back to their formation of the KKK. They are evil vile bastards period! Any registered Democrat should be ashamed of themselves.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/watch-looters-ransack-apple-lululemon-104318539.html

See above link

Looks like people of color operated in an organized mob to loot from white liberal stores (Apple and Lululemon) in Philadelphia

Why can't they just rob the vape and liquor stores or the pawn shops ?

.

Looting the white liberal stores is a good start towards getting liberals enlightened about the results of their policies.

But looting, say, Harvard Square and the dorms in Harvard Yard would be so much more effective.

Let's pray that they do it!

Patrick says

Looting the white liberal stores is a good start towards getting liberals enlightened about the results of their policies.

True Patrick. I wish the LA riots after the Rodney King trial would have continued through the posh white liberal enclaves like Hollywood Hills, Bel Air and Beverly Hills as well as Laguna Beach

At least we got the Rooftop Koreans from all that

Tenpoundbass says

Those neighborhoods are funding the mayhem. The intent is to psychologically abuse poor blacks. It's in Democrats DNA, going all the way back to their formation of the KKK.

NOT that I particularly want to defend the reprehensible KKK, but I want to point out what their origins are.

They were not a group of people attacking black men in the late 1800's. They were a vigilante group that went after carpetbaggers from the North who were stealing property and land after the Civil War.

It was later they were taken over by the government, the Democratic side in particular, in the early 1900's to prevent blacks from voting, which they would naturally vote Republican because "Lincoln freed the slaves" - in reality, Lincoln didn't free anybody. The 13th amendment was passed after he was dead. Lincoln was not the "great emancipator", he (like just about everybody at the time) was a complete racist. He was such a racist, that the idea that blacks and whites should live together was an abomination to him. He planned to export them to Liberia. Blacks were even offered, I think $100 (maybe $200) to move to Liberia, and that was a considerable sum of money in GOLD back then, about $10K today.

The KKK was infiltrated and destroyed in the 1960's. What is the KKK today, is run by the Feds. It no longer exists as an organization.

ad says

True Patrick. I wish the LA riots after the Rodney King trial would have continued through the posh white liberal enclaves like Hollywood Hills, Bel Air and Beverly Hills as well as Laguna Beach

If that happened, you'd see suddenly, the police can be very effective.

richwicks says

They were not a group of people attacking black men in the late 1800's. They were a vigilante group that went after carpetbaggers from the North who were stealing property and land after the Civil War.

Also forgotten is they were anti-Catholic as well, which was the top concern of the KKK in places like Indiana and Oregon, where they existed in surprisingly strong numbers, despite the lack of Negro population (most US urban areas had very few Blacks until after WW2; NYC wasn't even 10% Black in 1940)

richwicks says

The KKK was infiltrated and destroyed in the 1960's. What is the KKK today, is run by the Feds. It no longer exists as an organization.

Yes, and most "Right Wing Extremists" are. Ray Epps was in one of these groups as well, and several other high leadership in these groups are almost certainly Feds. FakeRiot front are Feds with a handful of useful idiots.

richwicks says

The 13th amendment was passed after he was dead. Lincoln was not the "great emancipator", he (like just about everybody at the time) was a complete racist.

I see you've been bamboozled by Liberal revisionist History. Lincoln and his administration, were abolishing Slavery mainly because the South had an unfair economic advantage over the Northern states. Now he could have just expanded slavery to the Northern states if it were purely over economics.