7
0

Clinton Foundation Tax Return Shows It's A Scam


 invite response                
2018 Aug 12, 4:36am   14,242 views  55 comments

by MisterLefty   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

These figures are from an official copy of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation for the tax year 2014.


The copy of the tax return is from the National Center for Charitable Statistics website!

You can get the latest tax return on any charitable organization! (link below)

Total revenue (line 12) ……………….$177,804,612.00

Total grants to charity (line 13) ………..$5,160,385.00 (that’s less than 3%)

Total expenses of………………………… $91,281,145.00

expenses include: salaries (line 15)….$34,838,106.00
fund raising fees (line 16a) ……….$850,803.00
other expenses (line 17) …..$50,431,851.00

They list 486 employees (line 5)!

It took 486 people who are paid $34.8 million and $91.3 million in fees and expenses, to give away $5.1 MILLION WHICH IS LESS THAN 3% OF TOTAL REVENUES!

Line 22 shows ending year net assets/fund balances of $332,471,349.00 which is up $85,171,891 from last year’s tax return!

And they call this a CHARITY?

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50010.htm

« First        Comments 52 - 55 of 55        Search these comments

52   richwicks   2023 Feb 24, 9:14pm  

Hey @"Eric Holder" - where's you're response to this post. It's really easy to accuse somebody of not knowing what they are talking about, and I know it's not pleasant to eat crow. I know directly because I've eaten plenty of it in my lifetime.

Now you know that there ARE Nazis in Ukraine - whatever that might mean to Ukrainians. Their view of what a "Nazi" is, is almost certainly different than how Americans view "Nazis" which is also different than how Germans of 1945 viewed them as.

You also know there were biological labs in Ukraine and because all BSL5 labs have dual use, and Victoria Nuland was expressing concern in front of congress, you know that it can only imply one thing.

It's fine to be in error. Everybody is wrong at times, and that's no sin, it's no personal failing.

But once corrected, then it does become a sin because it moves from making an honest mistake, to pushing a lie, which causes other people to later make the same mistake. You're sabotaging other people by lying to them. That's morally wrong, and it's a burden on people who tell the truth. It's EASY to spread a lie, and it's hard to spread the truth. People who spread the truth have to do it over, and over, and over again.

Now I'm waiting. Are you going to LIE about this from this point forward or will you not lie? Let's see.
53   WookieMan   2023 Feb 24, 10:16pm  

richwicks says

Quit promoting US propaganda. I'm tired of American propaganda. I'm tired of people repeating it, either mindlessly, or intentionally. I'm sick of it.

Move. California is the main problem. So is IL. Speaker of the house has been/is from CA or IL since 1999 for 16 years. Hastert diddled kids on the wresting mat. Pelosi is a fucking moron. Paul Ryan was a neocon. So was boner. McCarthy is no different. They generally control legislation.

Just move to a country you like. You bitch about this one and likely do nothing to improve it in any way, shape or form. Your whining is falling on deaf ears at this point. No one is listening to the exact same comment over and over and over. "Ehhhh our government is corrupt, 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc." It's getting old.
54   richwicks   2023 Feb 25, 11:19am  

WookieMan says

Just move to a country you like. You bitch about this one and likely do nothing to improve it in any way, shape or form. Your whining is falling on deaf ears at this point. No one is listening to the exact same comment over and over and over. "Ehhhh our government is corrupt, 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc." It's getting old.


Enjoy allowing your kids falling into slavery then.

I have a cousin that already abandoned this nation. I'm going to stay back her and watch it burn and say "I told you so", before I'm hauled off to the gulags.
55   Ceffer   2023 Feb 25, 11:41am  

Adrenochrome isn't the isolated industrial chemical. It's the stuff harvested from the blood of terrified children and their complex adrenal output, of which the industrial chemical is a single contributory component. They grade the quality output from particular children. It's much more expensive than cocaine, which makes it the ne plus extra designer drug.

The long term consumption of human tissues doesn't seem to work out that well, in spite of short term 'gain'. However, long term pain vs. short term gain is a characteristic of all abused drugs. Human tissue consumption seems to have neurologic consequences aka IHLlary's seizure disorders. Bill also looks unusually aged for his nominal years and had heart surgery already in his 50's. However he was also already a serious coke head since Arkansas and was remanded to rehabs in secret a couple of times.

It's hard to say how many politicians would be 'privileged' to take adrenochrome. It seems they are more into standard stimulants and cocaine when they need that extra sparkle in their eyes and zip in their step.

Whether or not adrenochrome is agent with particular individuals, it is certainly allegoric to their general attitudes and behaviors. There was that Ellen DeGenerate interview with Sandra Bullock on air, where the Sandra was just gushing about some facial that used tissues from children's foreskins. Her narcissism was much more important than pondering point of origin.

I used to not believe it, but as the puzzle pieces fall more into place, it makes odd sense. However, the Overton Window for it is steep.

« First        Comments 52 - 55 of 55        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions