2
0

Anon twitter user drops 28,000 HRC emails online


               
2017 Jul 10, 5:12pm   1,559 views  17 comments

by lostand confused   follow (3)  

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07/breaking-anon-twitter-acct-white-rabbit-just-dropped-28000-hillary-private-emails-online/

A mysterious IT specialist, who goes by the name TheForensicator, published a detailed report that appears to disprove the theory that the DNC was hacked by Russia.The documents were copied on July 5th, five days before Seth Rich was murdered.TheForensicator summarized the complex report into 10 bullet points.The most important aspect about the report is the estimated speed of transfer

Comments 1 - 17 of 17        Search these comments

2   Goran_K   2017 Jul 10, 5:44pm  

The Russia conspiracy was always a made up fairy tale.

This should convince most people with even moderate IQs of that conclusion as well.

3   HEY YOU   2017 Jul 10, 6:21pm  

Anyone have info from Mueller?
Didn't think so.

4   FortWayne   2017 Jul 10, 6:41pm  

Won't find this on CNN I bet

5   Rew   2017 Jul 10, 8:54pm  

The desperation is thick THICK.
I'll wait for further analysis by a more reputable source, or cross verified at least. :)

6   lostand confused   2017 Jul 10, 9:11pm  

Rew says

The desperation is thick THICK

LOL you guys. Trump's lawyer met with some lawyer for 20 min-congressional inquiries, treason blah, blah, blah. But hey a report of 28,000 emails released-oh nothing to see here. Like i keep saying-please don't change till 2020.

7   Rew   2017 Jul 10, 9:26pm  

lostand confused says

please don't change

Those words are the way I know I've got you.
Mmmmmmm. Delicious. ;)

8   lostand confused   2017 Jul 10, 9:46pm  

Rew says

Those words are the way I know I've got you

Nah the difference between me and you is I choose a side based on what I think is suitable for that moment. I voted for Obama the 1st time around. if it does not work out-big deal-always have the next election.
You and many on he left have a position set and a side set and fit everything into that perspective.

I know the world is far larger than me and will make judgement on what comes up.
You have a judgement and attempt to fit the world to your judgement,.Have fun and keep at it till 2020.

Oh and you people are boring-how long can one watch a hamster spin its wheel-to it it may be interesting, but to humans after a while it is boring-find a new toy.

9   Rew   2017 Jul 10, 10:05pm  

lostand confused says

You and many on he left have a position set and a side set and fit everything into that perspective.

When the alternative is: removing healthcare from millions, removing HIV vaccines for millions, stoking irrational fear, stoking divisions within the country, being a complete imbecile, attacking the freedoms of the press and transparency ... what other side is there?

10   Rew   2017 Jul 10, 10:06pm  

lostand confused says

You have a judgement and attempt to fit the world to your judgement,.Have fun and keep at it till 2020.

I've voted for Republicans, many times, even some during Obama's presidency. If partisanship is a comfortable motive you tell yourself, that's fine, but it isn't accurate.

11   curious2   2017 Jul 10, 10:42pm  

Rew says

removing HIV vaccines...being a complete imbecile

Where did those go? Are you saying the President took away the vaccines?

12   komputodo   2017 Jul 10, 11:42pm  

Rew says

I'll wait for further analysis by a more reputable source,

Just out of curiosity, who do you consider a reputable souce? I think lots of us would like to know.

13   komputodo   2017 Jul 10, 11:44pm  

PCGyver says

Sounds like more fake news to me.

Fake news is the new norm.

14   lostand confused   2017 Jul 11, 1:03am  

Rew says

attacking the freedoms of the press and transparency ... what other side is there?

That is you. You were the one cheering when Trump supporters were brutally attacked and bloodied and women were surrounded and egged just for exercising their first amendment right. Stop pretending you care about freedom. Just stop.

15   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2017 Jul 11, 2:57am  

It seems like a lot of assumptions were made by an anonymous person.

For example, how do they know when the files were 'first copied'? If they were put into an archive (rar) file very quickly, that means that a command was run on a computer network that housed the files. This could be achieved by any computer that had been hacked. The rar file could then be moved elsewhere at any transfer rate.
They state that the archive was probably assembled using linux. OK. Then, they jump from that to the assumption that it was a usb distro. Do they have some reason to think that there were no linux boxes in the DNC?
It's somewhat interesting information, but the analysis has a lot of specious assumptions and the source is anonymous.

16   komputodo   2017 Jul 11, 11:39am  

komputodo says

Rew says

I'll wait for further analysis by a more reputable source,

Just out of curiosity, who do you consider a reputable souce? I think lots of us would like to know.

rew is stumped LOL...he can't come up with a reputable source yet he likes to imagine that one exists.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste