patrick.net

"I'm completely against [feminism]. I have no desire to give up my privileges."
- Hannah Arendt

SJWs have always been with us:

https://babylonbee.com/news/oh-no-girl-james-bond-is-foiled-when-villain-places-details-of-his-evil-plans-in-pickle-jar

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/bidens-tax-credit-wont-convince-women-have-more-kids/

First, we’ll need to push back hard against climate alarmism. Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book The Population Bomb had an immediate and devastating effect on American birthrates. The equivalent pro-natalist book has yet to be written (or, if it has been written, has yet to be popularized). That book will need to make plain the horrors of a childless world and convince vast swaths of Americans that we give up far more than we gain when we choose not to have children.

We’ll also need to craft a sexual education curriculum and cultural discourse that doesn’t leave young women with the overwhelming impression that babies are bloodsucking parasites bent on destroying their bodies and careers. Young motherhood should be presented as a viable, even a desirable, option. ... Instead, women are encouraged to develop a relationship to their own fertility that is self-loathing and pharma-technologically mediated rather than empowered and organic.

As a reproductive endocrinologist recently observed in a letter to the editor of the New York Times, ‘Family planning, to the limited extent it is taught in our schools, focuses entirely on the prevention of undesired pregnancy. Ironically, no attention is given to the limits of human fertility and the question of how to conceive when a pregnancy is desired.’

Encouraging marriage is another important step toward increased fertility. Indeed, one scholar claims that the decline in birthrate is the direct result of the decline in marriage. Sure, unmarried people have children, but they do so at a lower rate, and out-of-wedlock births bring with them a host of accompanying social ills.

Feminism is war on motherhood.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/south-yorkshire-police-officer-sexually-assaulted-sheffield-a8326961.html

Police officer sexually assaulted as she was arresting attempted rape suspect.

https://spectatorworld.com/topic/feminism-has-failed-us-progress/

Feminism has failed us
Has demonstrating our alleged progress replaced progress itself?

October 18, 2021

I’ve lost count of how many seminars I’ve had to sit through on Diversity & Inclusion, how many times I’ve been asked for my preferred pronouns and expected to discuss what I think ‘bringing my whole self to work’ really means. Conservatives mock these practices and complain that our lives seem to be dictated by a new moral order to which we did not consent. But we’re missing the forest for the trees. The problem with virtue signaling goes far beyond its annoying and unwelcome intrusions into our lives. We have been utterly hoodwinked. ...

We’re in the umpteenth wave of feminism, and yet the tangible gains made by everyone except the early pioneers are negligible. Sure, if you’re a New York City broker and you’re showing an apartment, you can’t call that comfortable room with the TV and the couch and the bookshelves the ‘family room’ — because that would be so discriminatory that buyers without families might just self-immolate all over the parquet. ...

But do we ever stop to ask whether demonstrating our alleged progress has replaced progress itself?

I’m thinking back to my time working for a company specifically known for its family-friendly vibe. Despite that facade, I was paid not a single cent during my maternity leave. ...

Our corporations take the easy path, and we let them. Nay, we encourage it. They make statements, mandate trainings and shout from the rooftops ‘We are progressive. We are woke. Forgive us, even if we have not actually sinned.’

Hypocrisy is nothing new. The media mammoth covered #MeToo with a vengeance, only to shrug when it turned out that similar misdeeds were happening in its own ranks. The senators and activists who said ‘Believe all women’ turned out not to believe us, if it meant rankling prominent members of their party. But our willingness to believe in a progress that doesn’t exist — that’s new. And it’s pathetic. ...

Progressives have spent so much time fighting battles that don’t actually need to be won that it seems that all of us have forgotten we still haven’t won the battles we very much do need to win. If I read another article advocating for free bleeding, a disgusting practice in which women, in some perverse political statement, do not wear any kind of tampon or pad and instead allow their periods to flow, unimpeded, my brains will explode through my ears, also unimpeded.

The same is true for the left’s — and increasingly, the scientific community’s — newfound obsession with saying ‘pregnant people’ and ‘lactating people’ instead of ‘women’. I understand that there is a tiny segment of the transgender population that probably appreciates this verbiage, but meanwhile plenty of workplaces in this country still don’t have lactation rooms, and still find ways to get out of paying maternity leave. Women are letting ourselves, our employers and our generation off the hook on some important issues because we’re forced to pay lip service to imaginary ones.

Thing is, I'm not sure what battles she thinks feminism still needs to win now that women are legally superior to men.

https://notthebee.com/article/miss-france-beauty-pageant-faces-lawsuit-from-former-contestants-for-discriminating-based-on-appearances

And I know they don't technically call them "beauty pageants" anymore, but we all know that's what they are. Yeah, yeah, the women competing have super impressive resumes and do great charity work, but at the end of the day, if you aren't pretty, you aren't taking home that crown.

Miss France beauty pageant faces lawsuit from former contestants ... for discriminating based on appearances

Nobody stopping them from having an ugly contest. Winner gets a designer bag for the face.

HeadSet says

Nobody stopping them from having an ugly contest.

... except for a lawsuit for discriminating based on appearances.

What do you call an act of rape and a female cop on the scene? A twofer.

Ceffer says

What do you call an act of rape and a female cop on the scene? A twofer.

Too bad if a pre-op transwoman shows up and karmas the rapist.

Jezebel's War

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjWE85WjhxY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVqtzcQjgdc

There was a purpose behind the wave to mock the Old Received Wisdom.

Beware of the Nasty Woman, and beware that She loves her Idols.

https://notthebee.com/article/this-creep-clocked-a-woman-on-the-nyc-subway-and-none-of-the-weenies-around-had-the-courage-to-stop-him

Feminist women will simply have to defend themselves.

If women don't have female roles, then men do not have male roles, right?

https://babylonbee.com/news/patriarchy-declares-victory-after-conquering-womens-sports-restrooms-movie-roles

TheophilusWrites Overcoming Secularism ·20 hr ago
Controversial but likely accurate theory: all of this coincides with women having far more influence over our institutions including the media. Thus more of an “empathetic” angle on the news.

https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/how-journalism-abandoned-the-working/comments

The realization of this truth by men is perhaps the most important force in American politics. This is why https://heartiste.org/ was censored by Wordpress.

Once men see that they're being exploited and humiliated by such women, and by militant feminists in particular, they leave the left, never to return.

https://patriotpost.us/articles/84154?mailing_id=6267&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_source=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net&utm_content=body

Masculinity Is Being Attacked
Men are being told that masculinity is unacceptable, and it’s creating a generation of idle, absent, unmanly men.

Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri is on a crusade to call men out of their stasis and back to their true selves. In a speech made at the National Conservatism Conference in Orlando, Hawley said: “The Left want to define traditional masculinity as toxic. They want to define the traditional masculine virtues — things like courage and independence and assertiveness — as a danger to society.” There is a disdain for virtues in our society because there is a disdain for faith and traditional values. America has an identity crisis and it hurts men. Insisting that manliness is naturally a bad thing that’s to be rejected gives men no motivation to participate in the aspects of society that need their skills the most. Women need strong, masculine men, and so does society.

Men of this generation have been shamed into a more compliant and feminine shadow of who they could be. Senator Hawley rhetorically asked, “Can we be surprised that after years of being told they are the problem, that their manhood is the problem, more and more men are withdrawing into the enclave of idleness and pornography and video games?” This lack of accountability and retreating into fantasy is a problem for men of all races and creeds, creating absentee fathers and poor providers.

But it’s not all men’s fault. On the one hand, they have the political socialists telling them that work is no longer a noble or worthy activity. For example, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants a system that provides “economic security to all those who are unable or unwilling to work” [emphasis added]. Then they have the feminists insisting that men are the oppressors of women. Feminists would probably prefer a women-dominate culture à la the Amazons of Greek mythology where the gender roles are completely reversed. They forget that even in that myth, Hippolyte, Queen of the Amazons, was more attracted to masculine Hercules than the wimpy she-men of the Amazon tribe.

It’s not just the socialists and the feminists who are degrading masculinity. The American Psychological Association (APA) has even lent its platform to the dismantling of it. It attributes certain downward trends to “traditional masculinity”: “Men commit 90 percent of homicides in the United States and represent 77 percent of homicide victims. They’re the demographic group most at risk of being victimized by violent crime. They are 3.5 times more likely than women to die by suicide, and their life expectancy is 4.9 years shorter than women’s. Boys are far more likely to be diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder than girls, and they face harsher punishments in school — especially boys of color.”

Notice that all the blame for the negative behaviors of men is placed at the doorstep of traditional masculinity or “toxic masculinity.” But the APA forgot to recon with biology. Even scientists can figure out a way to put men down.

A study conducted by the University of Cambridge details the fact that men are naturally more systematic and logical, whereas women are empathetic. The study tested over half a million people, so the results were thorough. While it does definitively state that men and women are different psychologically, it also labels men’s tendency toward logic as an autistic trait. There is nothing wrong with being autistic, of course. Autism sufferers are some of the most out-of-the-box thinkers we have and we need their insight. But the “autism” label does have a lot of negative stigma attached to it, especially in the social context. By affixing this label to the way a man thinks and processes, it implies that men are not neurotypical. Even in this study that disproves the idea there are no differences between the sexes, it finds a way to degrade men.

Leftist elites want to push a genderless society, but they’re only succeeding in hurting the next generation by creating confusion and destroying identity. Matt Walsh, podcaster and political pundit, pointed out that this attempt to erase masculinity from children is stealing childhoods. An example of this is that boys learn differently than girls. Boy are not built to sit for long periods of time. This causes problems in the classrooms. So if their spirit is not chastised out of them, they are medicated to get the desired behavior. But if they are not medicated, they are introduced to “transgender” ideology, which seeks to convince children that it does’t matter what you are biologically — boys can be girls and girls can be boys. This makes for sad, confused, and messed up kids.

So what’s the solution? Teach boys how to be brave, critical thinkers, courteous, strong, independent, adventurous, and wise. Raise boys to be men of character. As Candace Owens puts it: “There is no society that can survive without strong men. The East knows this. In the west, the steady feminization of our men at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children is not a coincidence. It is an outright attack. Bring back manly men.”

https://archive.md/a15O0

Fake sugar daddies are 'conning students out of thousands of pounds' by posing as rich older men on internet dating websites

Fraudsters have been posing as 'sugar daddies' online, striking up a relationship with their victim before tricking them into handing over their personal information, 'so they can send them a gift or set up a credit card for them.'
But the conmen instead use the details to access the victim's banks and spend their money, or even to set up accounts in their name, saddling them with thousands of pounds of debt, The Times reported.

Booger says

https://archive.md/a15O0

Fake sugar daddies are 'conning students out of thousands of pounds' by posing as rich older men on internet dating websites

Fraudsters have been posing as 'sugar daddies' online, striking up a relationship with their victim before tricking them into handing over their personal information, 'so they can send them a gift or set up a credit card for them.'
But the conmen instead use the details to access the victim's banks and spend their money, or even to set up accounts in their name, saddling them with thousands of pounds of debt, The Times reported.

BWAHAHAHA

Booger says

https://archive.md/a15O0

Fake sugar daddies are 'conning students out of thousands of pounds' by posing as rich older men on internet dating websites

Fraudsters have been posing as 'sugar daddies' online, striking up a relationship with their victim before tricking them into handing over their personal information, 'so they can send them a gift or set up a credit card for them.'
But the conmen instead use the details to access the victim's banks and spend their money, or even to set up accounts in their name, saddling them with thousands of pounds of debt, The Times reported.

#stupidcunts

That fake sugar daddy bit used to only work on senile old widows. I guess some young women are just as brain dead.

Wow. And this Professor doubled down.

I'm going to find him and buy him a beer.

AmericanKulak says

Wow. And this Professor doubled down.

And ironically, will get laid a lot more now...

AmericanKulak says

Wow. And this Professor doubled down.

MASSIVE BALLS

If you want to have fun, go type "Redpill" into a search engine.

Obviously at this juncture, I'm reviewing some shit and excited as fuck to return order to my galaxy.

It's all fucking Jezebel and Guardian and Vox articles and Reddit threads whinging about /redpill.

"Sarcastic Sense of Humor"



Looks like she sucks dick for drugs at a Limp Bizkit or Juggalo Concert.

That is one rough 31, and the grannie panty swim bottoms are probably to hide a scar. The veganism adds 10 years.

Booger says

Searched for Roastie and found this:

The Chinese equivalent to Roastie is the "Black Wood-ear" (黑木耳), due to its resemblance to the female vulva and the myth that a women who is sexually active has high melanin content on the labia, in contrast to the "Pink Wood-ear" （粉木耳）,who were the other way round which are virgins/women with less sexual experience.

https://incels.wiki/w/Roastie?source=patrick.net

"Last time I cleaned a house I got 6 months for burglary, and couldn't get out of it with a blow job!"

I have heard from friends that those 'unrequited desire objects of youth' do circle around back to the males they scorned after losing the life lotteries.

One guy I know is pretty funny. He had an alcohol problem, and his wife left him and took all the furniture. He thought it was the most terrible thing ever.

He sobered up, and ran into her a few years later at a mutual friend's wedding and realized what a blessing it was. He said she was bowling ball mu mu mama, a corpulent, sweating mass of cellulite. He said he couldn't even get his arms around her for a fake hug. He said he'd go back to drinking if he ever had to get rid of her again, but probably that wouldn't even work now.

AmericanKulak says

https://incels.wiki/w/Roastie?source=patrick.net

@AmericanKulak This is a treasure trove of fun reading! Thanks for pointing it out.

By the way, that "Black Wood Ear" vs. "Pink Wood Ear" shit is dead on. The well used vaginas do indeed darken, and relatively Low Mileage ones stay pink (relative to race, of course). China and Greece are just storehouses of wisdom.

“Welcome to McFling’s. My name is Solomon II. May I take your order?” “Uh, yes. I’ll have the three months of meaningless sex from the Boyfriend Lite menu, add extra self respect. Hold the judgment and consequences please. “I’m sorry; we’re all out of self respect. Would you like to add a side of rationalization for only $1 more?” “Yeah. That’s fine. Super size it please.” “Thank you. Please pull up to the window for your total.”

There she is driving down the road of life at her own pace. She’s young, independent, beautiful and has all the time in the world. When she’s horny, she swings into the closest drive thru and places her order. She does the same thing when she’s sad, lonely, happy, up, down, in, out, excited, needy, afraid, strong, weak, depressed, moody, joyful, exhilarated, stressed, etc. Any and every reason is valid because she’s being “true to herself”. Every three months on average she swings into McFling’s and orders up the best looking or most exciting thing on the menu (because she’s sooo selective). There’s also a couple of late night snack runs thrown in there for good measure, but not as many as some other girls, so you have no right to judge her. She’s young and her metabolism is firing on all cylinders, so now is the time for her to gorge herself with no consequences.

At the age of 27, she starts to notice that her steady diet of junk food relationships isn’t as satisfying as it once was. Sure the bright lights, flashy signs, fast service and cheap satisfaction made for great fun, but now she’s starving for wholesome affection and beginning to show signs of emotional malnutrition. There has to be something better out there. Something more substantive. All of a sudden she decides to make a change. No more drive thru boyfriends. Certainly everyone understands that her junk food relationship binge wasn’t her fault since it’s the bulk of what society offers. It’s our culture. These greasy high calorie drive thru boyfriend establishments are on every corner, advertised on every channel, glamorized in the media, and no one really told her how bad they could be for her health. It’s society’s fault. It’s the franchise’s fault. All the girls she knows are doing it, so how could she possibly be expected to know any better? So now she wants steak, and by God she’s convinced that she deserves it from a five star restaurant.

She takes a shower hoping the stench of her decade long habit of frequenting McFling’s won’t be as noticeable. She may not know how to act properly at the new fancy steakhouse she’s going to try tonight, but it’s ok. Men always give her a pass on her behavior since she’s beautiful and an easy lay adventurous.

When she’s all done getting ready and is confident that she can look and act like the type of girl who has been eating healthy all along, she heads out for the best steakhouse in town. Why not the best? She deserves it, and her friend Michelle ate there last week (and she’s totally not even pretty).

With all the undeserved self confidence in the world and an advanced case of juvenile egocentrism, she pulls into the parking lot of the steakhouse. She notices there are dozens of people standing in line. She doesn’t understand. The stupid bitch at the hostess desk asked her if she had a reservation. A reservation?! How rude! She has a vagina and that’s always been sufficient before, so what gives? It seems the steakhouse is completely booked for months.

Now she’s pissed off. How could the upscale steakhouse refuse to seat her? So what if she showed up right at prime dinner time (27 years old o’clock) and demanded the best seat in the house. She deserves it. She’s waited so long for it… well, not really, but in theory anyway. She always knew the steakhouse was there, she just never took the time to plan ahead for reservations. It’s not her fault. As she drives away, she realizes she has another problem. She’s still hungry. She pulls in to yet another McFling’s, this time disgusted to be there. But she’s changed, so she decides to try something different.

“Welcome to McFling’s. My name is Solomon II. May I take your order?” “Uh, yes. I’ll have the steak please.” “We don’t serve steak. Show me your tits.” “I’m not like that anymore. Steak please.” “I can offer you the three months of meaningless sex from the Boyfriend Lite menu, and pretend to hold the judgment and consequences if you’d like.” “Steak please.” “Bitch, would you like me to serve you the three months of meaningless sex from the Boyfriend Lite menu, pretend to hold the judgment and consequences, and just tell you it’s steak?” “Steak please.” “Fine. Please pull up to the first window. I’ll have your total and a treat for your hamster.”

This cycle continues until she turns 30 and realizes that she’ll never get in to the steakhouse. She’s waited much too long to make reservations, so she settles for a Beta male who takes her to Chili’s on 2 for 1 night in his minivan. Hey, it’s not the steakhouse she deserves, but it’s better than that asshole Solomon II at the drive thru boyfriend joint. At least Chili’s has real silverware.

That night she stumbles upon a blog with a post entitled “Drive Thru Boyfriends” and gets righteously annoyed. That’s not her at all. That was never her intention. She’s different, special, and unique. What gives the author the right to assume that he knows her or can determine what she’s been through in her AMAZING life? He doesn’t know her story. He doesn’t know her heart. He can’t judge her actions based on what other girls do simply because she did the same things and ended up in the same situation they did. He can’t tell her what kind of person she is, or what her fate will be. She’s different than the rest. She’s strong, independent and wise beyond her years.

In her rage she hits the road again, confused by what has happened to her and angry that she didn’t get what she deserved out of life. With her Beta boyfriend wondering where the hell she is, she drives past the steakhouse which is closed for the night. Blinded by fury and driven by emotion, she decides to make yet another change. A real and meaningful change this time. This time she’ll get it right and enjoy what she deserves for being an amazing woman. Her rationalization hamster helps out with navigation and leads her to a brand new place. Somewhere she’s never been. This is it! This is what she needs. This time she’s confident she’ll get what she deserves.

And she does.

“Welcome to McFling’s. My name is Solomon II. May I take your order?”

“Steak, please…”

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/8g103b/drive_thru_boyfriends_by_solomon_ii_oldie_but/

Nice story above, but the reality is if the girl is still attractive at 27 and has no kids, she will have her pick of men who are 30-35. Much better than an ugly girl who stayed virtuous.

She will have her pick for the night, but getting real commitment from a man will not necessarily be easy.

Patrick says

She will have her pick for the night, but getting real commitment from a man will not necessarily be easy.

I have seen to many examples of the babe who was all career and fun during her early twenties suddenly lose enthusiasm for the career in the late twenties and look to settle down. At 28 or so, they marry a guy they would not have looked at twice when they were 22. Nobody cares about her "past" as long as no divorce and no kids.

I would care about her past.

I don't want to be guy number 43, or worse.

Men are pretty easy to exploit because of the dumb stick and the Mom-ism. Older women just have to become less selective, they can still score a warm body into middle age or so. One old hooker around my hood in Santa Cruz still has all the hooker ways of appealing to men's vanity, sex drive and ego, so she always has some kind of boy friend, but she's also crazy when she lets her guard down, so the boyfriends don't last very long.