1
0

Updated NASA Data: Global Warming Not Causing Any Polar Ice Retreat


 invite response                
2016 Jul 17, 8:55am   1,604 views  14 comments

by indigenous   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.

The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent.

Updated NASA satellite data show the polar ice caps remained at approximately their 1979 extent until the middle of the last decade. Beginning in 2005, however, polar ice modestly receded for several years. By 2012, polar sea ice had receded by approximately 10 percent from 1979 measurements. (Total polar ice area – factoring in both sea and land ice – had receded by much less than 10 percent, but alarmists focused on the sea ice loss as “proof” of a global warming crisis.)

A 10-percent decline in polar sea ice is not very remarkable, especially considering the 1979 baseline was abnormally high anyway. Regardless, global warming activists and a compliant news media frequently and vociferously claimed the modest polar ice cap retreat was a sign of impending catastrophe. Al Gore even predicted the Arctic ice cap could completely disappear by 2014.

In late 2012, however, polar ice dramatically rebounded and quickly surpassed the post-1979 average. Ever since, the polar ice caps have been at a greater average extent than the post-1979 mean.

Now, in May 2015, the updated NASA data show polar sea ice is approximately 5 percent above the post-1979 average.

The frequency of polar ice cap stories may have abated, but the tone and content has not changed at all. Here are some of the titles of news items I pulled yesterday from the front two pages of a Google News search for “polar ice caps”:
.
“Climate change is melting more than just the polar ice caps”

“2020: Antarctic ice shelf could collapse”

“An Arctic ice cap’s shockingly rapid slide into the sea”

“New satellite maps show polar ice caps melting at ‘unprecedented rate’”

The only Google News items even hinting that the polar ice caps may not have melted so much (indeed not at all) came from overtly conservative websites. The “mainstream” media is alternating between maintaining radio silence on the extended run of above-average polar ice and falsely asserting the polar ice caps are receding at an alarming rate.

To be sure, receding polar ice caps are an expected result of the modest global warming we can expect in the years ahead. In and of themselves, receding polar ice caps have little if any negative impact on human health and welfare, and likely a positive benefit by opening up previously ice-entombed land to human, animal, and plant life. Nevertheless, polar ice cap extent will likely be a measuring stick for how much the planet is or is not warming.

The Earth has warmed modestly since the Little Ice Age ended a little over 100 years ago, and the Earth will likely continue to warm modestly as a result of natural and human factors. As a result, at some point in time, NASA satellite instruments should begin to report a modest retreat of polar ice caps. The modest retreat – like that which happened briefly from 2005 through 2012 – would not be proof or evidence of a global warming crisis. Such a retreat would merely illustrate that global temperatures are continuing their gradual recovery from the Little Ice Age. Such a recovery – despite alarmist claims to the contrary – would not be uniformly or even on balance detrimental to human health and welfare. Instead, an avalanche of scientific evidence indicates recently warming temperatures have significantly improved human health and welfare, just as warming temperatures have always done.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/05/19/updated-nasa-data-polar-ice-not-receding-after-all/2/#8e0dab836b9d

Comments 1 - 14 of 14        Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2016 Jul 17, 9:08am  

We're going to start seeing more debunking and possible the worlds greatest fraud charges in the History of criminal justice, now that the UK has dropped the Charade.

2   indigenous   2016 Jul 17, 9:14am  

Tenpoundbass says

the worlds greatest fraud charges in the History of criminal justice

Yea right after Dubya gets indicted on complicity with the Saudis or Hillary get prosecuted for the laundry list of charges on her.

3   HydroCabron   2016 Jul 17, 9:29am  

Tenpoundbass says

We're going to start seeing more debunking and possible the worlds greatest fraud charges

Any day now ...

5   indigenous   2016 Jul 17, 9:58am  

HEY YOU says

Get back to me when you finish this entire link.

In a nut shell Al Gore is a prophet/profit, and we are doomed so give me more money and maybe I will save you.

6   HydroCabron   2016 Jul 17, 10:03am  

indigenous says

In a nut shell Al Gore is a prophet/profit, and we are doomed so give me more money and maybe I will save you.

I know orthopedic surgeons who make big bucks fixing fucked-up limbs. Therefore I should avoid hospitals if I break my leg.

While we're at it: That article was debated and answered a year ago.

7   indigenous   2016 Jul 17, 10:04am  

Oh ok I guess there isn't more ice on the polar caps then.

8   anonymous   2016 Jul 17, 10:56am  

HydroCabron says

I know orthopedic surgeons who make big bucks fixing fucked-up limbs. Therefore I should avoid hospitals if I break my leg.

just a random question - how many tatoo's and/or piercings do you have?

9   HEY YOU   2016 Jul 17, 11:54am  

indigenous says

In a nut shell Al Gore is a prophet/profit, and we are doomed so give me more money and maybe I will save you.

So you can't read my link.HOW SAD.

10   bob2356   2016 Jul 17, 4:25pm  

Isn't the heartland institute that james taylor works for and did the study for the same heartland institute that phillip morris paid to produce studies that denied tobacco caused cancer 20 years ago? I wonder who paid for this study? Anyone care to take a guess? I always love the credibility of your sources indi.

11   Someone_else   2016 Jul 17, 7:27pm  

Mr. Mc Pherson may be glad to have this information from Marusek:

https://nextgrandminimum.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/little_ice_age_theory.pdf

12   bob2356   2016 Jul 17, 9:03pm  

Dan says

Mr. Mc Pherson may be glad to have this information from Marusek:

https://nextgrandminimum.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/little_ice_age_theory.pdf

Interesting read. I'm not so sure about the sunspot stuff. I looked up and read the Usoskin paper. The relationships are nowhere near as solid as Marusek makes them out to be. I've never heard of death rates of 60% due to the little ice age from any source before. War, Climate Change & Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century is cited as the source, but I read the book when it first came out and it says no such thing. It cites mostly war and revolution for high death rates, not climate change.

The sargasso sea stuff has been pretty seriously questioned several times over a number of years by different organizations. It is definitely misrepresented by Marusek. http://www.skepticalscience.com/Sargasso-Sea-Not-Representative-of-Global-Temperature.html

Makes the whole paper seem a little suspect to me.

13   bob2356   2016 Jul 17, 9:06pm  

Ironman says

bob2356 says

james taylor

Ironman says



Dude, stay out of the barn.

James Taylor wrote the article that you are far to stupid to read. The concept that more than one person can be named James Taylor is way way beyond your comprehension level. Go back to stroking your gun. Try a little oil.

14   HEY YOU   2016 Jul 18, 11:36am  

I'm finding out who the assholes are that can't read this link & the links inside the link.

I was thinking it was sad but it's just denying ignorance.

http://guymcpherson.com/climate-chaos/climate-change-summary-and-update/

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions