Comments 1 - 1 of 9 Next » Last » Search these comments
All this really means is that they are letting it go because they believe they have other dishonest attacks against the President that they believe will get better traction than this.
Or it means that polling done by Fox news or maybe the Heritage Foundation indicated that these particular lies aren't working as well (with the right wing idiots) as they would like, and they need to find some better lies, or who knows, maybe even legitimate fact and logic based criticisms of the administration.
Do you think the right wing entertainment complex is going to apologize to Obama ?
Hahahahahahahahahahah,...ohhh yeah,...right.
Comments 1 - 1 of 9 Next » Last » Search these comments
An investigation by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee has concluded that the CIA and U.S. military responded appropriately to the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, dismissing allegations that the Obama administration blocked rescue attempts during the assault or sought to mislead the public afterward.
After a two-year probe that involved the review of thousands of pages of classified documents, the panel determined that the attack could not be blamed on an intelligence failure, and that CIA security operatives “ably and bravely assisted” State Department officials who were overwhelmed at a nearby but separate diplomatic compound.
The committee also found “no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,” rejecting claims that have fed persistent conspiracy theories that the U.S. military was prevented from rescuing U.S. personnel from a night-time assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.
The House panel faulted preliminary assessments by the CIA and other agencies on what had caused the attacks and motivated militants, leading to erroneous public assertions by then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice that the assault had erupted from a spontaneous protest. The White House effort to assemble her talking points was deemed “flawed.”
But overall, the panel's findings were broadly consistent with the Obama administration's version of events. Previous investigations have reached similar conclusions, but the House committee's report may be seen as more credible by critics of the administration's handling of Benghazi because the panel is controlled by Republicans.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-panel-finds-no-intelligence-failure-in-benghazi-attacks/2014/11/21/0749a070-71dd-11e4-ad12-3734c461eab6_story.html
#politics