Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
Relevancy fail.
How about an investigation from 2007 that says people are more likely to be struck by lightning than commit voter fraud:
http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/The%20Truth%20About%20Voter%20Fraud.pdf
Let's just call this whole voter fraud thing what it is. Currently, Republicans will loose the popular vote if enough people vote. There. I said it. Now, let's not have voter fraud be used as a scape goat for close elections.
Everything I see shows that fears over voter fraud are baseless. We do not have any impactful problem with vote tampering, corruption, or fraud in the US.
Just stop it.
Everything I see shows that fears over voter fraud are baseless. We do not have any impactful problem with vote tampering, corruption, or fraud in the US.
Of course he did not read the article...
Type "the heritage foundation" into Google and Google will fill in the last word "lies".
Heritage Foundation's Health Care Report Is Another Big Lie
Lies, Damn Lies, And The Heritage Foundation
Poverty statistics: Figures don’t lie, but the Heritage Foundation does
Heritage Foundation Video Exposes Its Own Lies
More Lies from the Heritage Foundation... Can they speak a word of truth ever, about anything?
How the Heritage Foundation Manufactured a New Obamacare Myth
Heritage Foundation says tax breaks for the rich the only way to prevent Ebola
I could go on and on, forever. The Heritage Foundation is a propaganda mill known for outrageous and unbelievable lies. Anyone who sites it as a legitimate source of information is a batshit crazy conservative with no grasp on reality and no realization that other people do.
Quoting the Heritage Foundation is like quoting The Onion, but far more ridiculous.
Which article, your historical account of voter fraud in 1982? Or the study I linked?
You're right, I didn't read your linked article except for the conclusion which states that voter fraud in 1982 or today, robs legitimate voters of their voice.
I agree. But that doesn't seem to be a very stunning revelation, does it? Yes, voter fraud is bad. Of more interest is, is it occurring on a wide scale today?
Quoting the Heritage Foundation is like quoting The Onion, but far more ridiculous.
You are you own caricature.
Quoting the Heritage Foundation is like quoting The Onion, but far more ridiculous.
You are you own caricature.
Given the Bizarro-world you live in, I'll take that as a complement.
Of more interest is, is it occurring on a wide scale today?
Yes through ACORN
Links to anything that isn't conspiratorially rubbish to back that up?
Of more interest is, is it occurring on a wide scale today?
Yes through ACORN
Then why don't you link to proof of wide scale voter fraud occurring today through ACORN? You can't.
2008 is not today. Also, how about something in the states that are enacting the new voter ID laws?
2008 is not today. Also, how about something in the states that are enacting the new voter ID laws?
So what is the new way O does this or considering that he like the wogster is a lame duck, therefore does not need to do this anymore.
2008 is not today. Also, how about something in the states that are enacting the new voter ID laws?
So what is the new way O does this or considering that he like the wogster is a lame duck, therefore does not need to do this anymore.
In other words, you have no response except nonsense.
Voter ID laws are not intended stop fraud - the miniscule amount that exists (on both sides) is not worth the extra tax dollars spent to enforce them. Voter ID laws are intended to make it difficult for the poor and young to vote. That's why we are seeing them enacted in Republican states.
Fuck, even your heartthrob Rand Paul has admitted as much.
It was happening with ACORN.
Because, who is going to argue with a hooker with a razor blade in her hair, a bad attitude, and an ass that looks like a sack full of bowling balls.
It was happening with ACORN.
I like how you avoid the term voting fraud. What is voter fraud? Is that like voter registration fraud? The only thing that counts is actual fraud in voting.
Yes some canvassers at ACORN signed up ineligable voters to get paid more. These names would have never made it to the voting rolls to be able to commit voting fraud. The local elections board would have weeded them out. ACORN is required by law to turn in the names even if they know for a fact they are fraudulent. Which they did and reported it. Try to learn how the process works before you post about it.
The only thing that counts is actual fraud in voting.
I'm expanding the definition fraud is fraud
Which they did and reported it.
Says you, the nice community organizers who's organization was conceived in the most politically corrupt part of the US, yea sure their trustworthy...
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2008/04/where-theres-smoke-theres-fire-100000-stolen-votes-in-chicago