by jojo follow (2)
« First « Previous Comments 21 - 26 of 26 Search these comments
What I am talking about is intentional living based on human needs vs corporate needs. Community needs vs. Elite needs. Living in smaller communities, technologically capable, organized for productivity to benefit the community and individuals, not to benefit a corporation. This is a major change in thinking. Much of what benefits and is useful in the corporate structure would become obsolete, eg. advertising. This is not communism. Don't look up intentional community on wikipedia, because this is not what I mean. No hippie-dippy, no spiritualism, no cult leader.
It sounds like you are describing a - bgmall4 - cover your ears - Kibbutz:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz
I met someone who had grown up on one in Israel. He had good things to say about it.
I just read another article about "Adjustable Mortgages" popping up. It's a sign that affordably is gone, and banks know it. Surprisingly it's still easy to sucker people into "adjustable" rates... so I guess "you can't teach stupid".
life everywhere else in the world sucked too, that is unless you were a member of the aristocracy.
And a man.
From wikipedia:
"With time, the kibbutz members' sense of identification with the kibbutz and its goals decreased. This process originated both from personal frustrations among the kibbutz members as a result of internal processes and from the growing stratification and inequality due to the growth of capitalistic practices.[13] Over the years, some kibbutz members established professional careers outside the kibbutz, accumulating power, privileges and prestige.[14] The balance between individual values and values of the kibbutz began to tip, and work motivation was affected. An emphasis was placed on social compensation to encourage productivity."
Basically, the kibbutz was destroyed because capitalism still exists. Like the example of the Tiaga above, a utopian concept implemented within the larger context of a capitalistic society is doomed for failure.
life everywhere else in the world sucked too, that is unless you were a member of the aristocracy.
And a man.
There were a few exceptions:


From wikipedia:
"With time, the kibbutz members' sense of identification with the kibbutz and its goals decreased. This process originated both from personal frustrations among the kibbutz members as a result of internal processes and from the growing stratification and inequality due to the growth of capitalistic practices.[13] Over the years, some kibbutz members established professional careers outside the kibbutz, accumulating power, privileges and prestige.[14] The balance between individual values and values of the kibbutz began to tip, and work motivation was affected. An emphasis was placed on social compensation to encourage productivity."
Basically, the kibbutz was destroyed because capitalism still exists. Like the example of the Tiaga above, a utopian concept implemented within the larger context of a capitalistic society is doomed for failure.
An imperfect model - learn from what happened there and try to improve on it.
« First « Previous Comments 21 - 26 of 26 Search these comments
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-11-06/fitch-warns-housing-bubble-says-unsustainable-jump-leaves-home-prices-17-overvalued
#housing