patrick.net

Indiana Jones says

Can there please be a "Misogynist" category?

Can there please be a wretched corrupted bitch category?

MershedPerturders says

Can there please be a wretched corrupted bitch category?

Thank you for the lovely example.

This is a ridiculous point to argue, but if you must... I will engage for a short time.

Honestly, how many women do you know who are abandoning their children (not counting abortion, of course) vs. the amount of men who have chosen to not be involved with their children (not supporting them or having much, if any contact)? In my personal experience, I have never met a woman who has left her child. I have met a number of men who do not know or barely know their children.

This is why we hear about single moms much more than about single dads.

This is why there are laws to make men at the least, financially responsible for their children.

I know you will probably call me names and rip this very reasonable response apart. Have fun with it!

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America -- one out of three -- live in biological father-absent homes.

Consequently, there is a "father factor" in nearly all of the social issues facing America today.

- See more at: http://www.fatherhood.org/media/consequences-of-father-absence-statistics#sthash.CnTy4B4X.dpuf

and

The Typical Single Parent is a Mother:

Approximately 84% of custodial parents are mothers, and
16% of custodial parents are fathers

http://singleparents.about.com/od/legalissues/p/portrait.htm

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/09/05/the-misogyny-myth/

Contrary to what you see in the press (or Barbie), misogyny is not rampant in modern societies. There is no evil patriarchy oppressing women. Quite the reverse: Both men and women are guilty of misandry, a bias against men. My City Journal article reviews the overwhelming evidence (ignored or suppressed by misandrist journalists and scholars) of bias against men, from the ‘women are wonderful’ effect reported by psychologists to the discrimination against men in the legal system, government, schools, corporations, and academia.

This misandrist bias is probably innate, and it’s being exploited by a diversity industry that falsely blames sexism for any gender gap not favouring women. Yes, women are ‘underrepresented’ in some fields, especially at the top, but it’s not because of discrimination. It’s because of factors like the ‘gender productivity gap’ and the ‘competition gap’ (which explains why scientists in the 99th percentile of productivity are disproportionately male, and why 95 of the top 100 Scrabble players are men). The misogyny myth serves the interests of the diversity industry, but it’s enormously damaging to the rest of society — women as well as men — because it poisons relations between the sexes and undermines the system that has provided unprecedented opportunities and prosperity to everyone: meritocracy.

"Death to the Patriarchy" is becoming mainstream...

Patrick says

“fucking men, always fucking it up for women.”

Whenever I see conversations between men and women at the health club (surprisingly, not that often) you hear the men's voices go up a half octave (literally at a higher pitch) and they seem to immediately cater and cajole and humor the women. I never see the women lower their voice a half octave and cater or cajole or humor the men, they're always a little bit tense and slightly bitchy. Rarely, a woman will project that she likes a man in public if they look like they have a relationship (captured).

Both men and women change each other in each other's company to an entirely different script, different when men are with men or women are with women. We are biologically sexually and hormonally schizophrenic.

I still remember a girl I talked with in a school cafeteria in Houston when I was on an interview trip. "I believe women are extra special. Women should be placed on a pedestal." At least she was honest in her female solipsism but she got mad when I laughed at her.

She is clearly a bit proud/happy to make the effort to post that she is considered pretty enough to be desired to be taken from behind (most animalic) and to easily have affairs with coworkers risking their job for her. There is nothing to be sorry for her about.

Now tell me, how many men seemingly at that age have a wife that doesn’t work. Seriously.

Dumb blond and Dumber dude. Hey that's a good title for a movie !

MolotovCocktail says

I sure wish I could find or download this. I have 2 daughters and some nieces who need to see this.

Glock-n-Load says

I sure wish I could find or download this. I have 2 daughters and some nieces who need to see this.

All the way to the bottom right are three vertical dots. Click on that.

Found it on Instagram.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTZXoYuDgUX/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ%3D%3D

Old man giving young man advice about marriage.

Old man: You shouldn't put up with that, tell her .... then do this.... that's what I would do!
Young guy: How many times have you been married?
Old Man: I'm divorced from my 5th wife.

There sure is a lot of push on social media to get men to reject women, while showing Liberal women as examples to not have relationships. While at the same time Homosexuals is being shoved down our throats on every front. You can really sit there and entertain the Color Guard Revolution's assault on the nuclear family and the male/female bond and attraction?
Really! It's Marxist propaganda to make you reject what is normal.

Tenpoundbass says

Old man giving young man advice about marriage.

Old man: You shouldn't put up with that, tell her .... then do this.... that's what I would do!
Young guy: How many times have you been married?
Old Man: I'm divorced from my 5th wife.

There sure is a lot of push on social media to get men to reject women, while showing Liberal women as examples to not have relationships. While at the same time Homosexuals is being shoved down our throats on every front. You can really sit there and entertain the Color Guard Revolution's assault on the nuclear family and the male/female bond and attraction?
Really! It's Marxist propaganda to make you reject what is normal.

Interesting comment. It does seem inorganic. We should be teaching what TO DO instead of telling everyone to keep a lookout for disrespect. Old school ways were used because they worked.

As far as paying the bill during my dating years, it was whoever asked the other one out did the paying. That is true equality. And what happens when you go to the lady's house for a home cooked meal? Do you chip in for the food costs?

Women don't ask men out on dates. Well, I won't say never but, certainly nowhere near the % that men do. But yeah, I'd think if I ask someone I am interested in to go to dinner with me, I'd pay. Not only that but, it's a signal that I like her.

My big failing was thinking I had to be married.

It's stupid to play Russian Roulette with a Revolver where there are 3 bullets in the 6-round chamber AND it's the other person that determines where and when the game is played 70% of the time (women file far more often)

Just don't marry them and you can have kids with the least crazy ones (no SSRIs, BiPolar, etc. in her OR her immediate family) that are employed or have licenses, certs, degrees, or extensive work history (very important).

If a woman is into you she won't give a shit.

In the US, paternity is on the birth certificate.

You don't split your assets, pay alimony or spousal support, keep all your shit, and STILL get the visitation rights that are the norm in your state. You pay child support but increasingly, a silver lining from gay marriage, it's calculated with incomes in mind and share of custody.

Think carefully about WHERE you have kids, like Florida which is 50/50 by legal default except in extreme circumstances.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

You don't split your assets, pay alimony or spousal support, keep all your shit, and STILL get the visitation rights that are the norm in your state. You pay child support but increasingly, a silver lining from gay marriage, it's calculated with incomes in mind and share of custody.

Guess you never heard the legal term 'common law spouse'.

After so many years of cohabitating after marriage, she can go after you just like if you were married.

Granted, very few states have this. But, if you have an established common law marriage in one state, other states have to legally recognize that because of the Full Faith & Credit Clause in the Constitution.

MolotovCocktail says

Guess you never heard the legal term 'common law spouse'.

Only in a few states like California.

But yes, something to keep in mind.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

Only in a few states like California.

Nope.

California isn't a common law marriage state.

MolotovCocktail says

Glock-n-Load says

I sure wish I could find or download this. I have 2 daughters and some nieces who need to see this.

All the way to the bottom right are three vertical dots. Click on that.

Or just right-click on the video. Works for me anyway.

TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says

a silver lining from gay marriage, it's calculated with incomes in mind and share of custody

I worked with an Asian woman who got divorced and was furious to find she owed him alimony because her income is higher, and that's how it works in California.

Patrick says

MolotovCocktail says

Glock-n-Load says

I sure wish I could find or download this. I have 2 daughters and some nieces who need to see this.

All the way to the bottom right are three vertical dots. Click on that.

Or just right-click on the video. Works for me anyway.

Got it. I was trying to do it on my phone. Probably better that I wasn't able to because I was ready to send it to my daughter. I think that would have ended badly.

MolotovCocktail says

California isn't a common law marriage state.

California has "Palimony" which is almost as bad, worse in some cases because it leaves too much to the Judge to subjectively rule, and unlike most other states, doesn't require a pre-existing legal contract. "Implicit" claims can be made by the plaintiff.

The threat of a long ass lawsuit where the outcome is nebulous and not predictable along with the total attorney bill is a great way to get an out-of-court settlement.

https://minellalawgroup.com/blog/the-truth-about-common-law-marriage-palimony-in-california/

Lee Marvin, Billy Jean King, Martina Navratilova, etc.

That whole relationship is fucked, in all of the videos.

He's not optimal either, too defensive. He should talk less.

Patrick says

That whole relationship is fucked, in all of the videos.

Yeah, mutual resentment isn't a great foundation for a relationship. The ancient biological imperatives must be observed, and that means a man has to pay to get his sperm anchored.

It's just incredibly easy to field distort women in general in their biologic solipsism, which is why they can so easily be used as a basic tool of subversion.

I think in this particular context, her behavior can be considered to be deceitful.

However, IMHO a woman's first instinct is to evade giving a direct unambiguous answer to a simple question. I think it's hard wired to femaleness - don't offend members of the tribe and keep answers vague, so that everyone can read their desired answer into the wishy-washy response and thus still like the girl.

stereotomy says

don't offend members of the tribe and keep answers vague, so that everyone can read their desired answer into the wishy-washy respons

Sounds like a politician.

HeadSet says

stereotomy says

don't offend members of the tribe and keep answers vague, so that everyone can read their desired answer into the wishy-washy respons

Sounds like a politician.

Politicians cater to the majority of the electorate who are - women.