0
0

Costly house or Cheap house from investment point of view ?


 invite response                
2011 Dec 5, 8:47am   4,791 views  12 comments

by leo9   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

All please provide your thoughts on this.

Is it a good idea to buy a costly house (when interest rate is low ) or buy a cheap house ?
By costly house I mean $650 - $670K 3 bedroom and by cheap I mean $520 - $570k 2 bedroom.
I have myself, my wife and little one 3 months old. We don't need a very big place for
next 4-5 years. 2 bedroom should be fine for now. We may need 3 bedroom from 4-5 years from now but I am assuming
by then the house prices will go up. Should we buy 3 bedroom now since interest rate
is low or should go with little cheaper 2 bedroom and use the savings towards investment and buy 3 bedroom later after 4-5 years from now?
I can afford down payment for both.

What is the best from investment point of view ? I think nobody knows about future but it is
safe to say that house prices might go up 5 years from now.

#investing

Comments 1 - 12 of 12        Search these comments

1   mdovell   2011 Dec 5, 9:32am  

That is a hard question to really answer unless some sort of location is given. That amount is pretty high..if you are in the bay area that might be ok but if you are in other parts that can be sky high.

2   swebb   2011 Dec 5, 10:44am  

I wouldn't want to buy a house right now with the plan of selling in the short term (5 years is short term for a house). Both prices represent a significant amount of money, so I would be sure to understand the local market, particularly what equivalent rent would be, etc. At the end of the day if I were convinced that I wanted to buy a house, I would lean toward something I could stay in for a long time, so probably the 3 bedroom in your case. I will say, however, that 2 children can share a room for many years, especially if they end up being the same gender.

-s

3   Mr B   2011 Dec 5, 12:07pm  

If you see yourself in the home longer then 10 yrs I would go with the 3 bedroom, but if less I would go with 2. You don’t want to be upside down in 5 years. If you can’t sell the home for what you owe on it you will be in trouble. Since econ is almost constant over long term I would look at the 3 bedroom if long then 8yrs. Good luck!

4   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 5, 12:55pm  

Agree with Eman. But beware of hoa. Beware of how many units in building in foreclosure. Do your research. And then do it again.

5   clambo   2011 Dec 5, 1:05pm  

None of the houses you mention are "cheap". Since when is 1/2 million bucks+ cheap?
No house is going to be a good "investment", they are houses. An investment property would be one you buy with the intention of 1. renting 2. selling at a profit.
So, you are buying a house, not an "investment property." Fine and dandy.
You should buy the smaller house.
Borrowing MORE money today for something you MAY need later is not good policy in my opinion.
Who will encourage you to take on larger debt and buy the larger house? Probably your wife and others who will have no problem putting YOU into deeper debt to satisfy them.
Incidentally, house prices are falling probably almost everywhere. There will be millions more foreclosures, the process of foreclosure has no end in sight.

6   KILLERJANE   2011 Dec 5, 1:45pm  

Remember having housing debt is a life time of burden. Questions to ask when deciding on a property (home or rental) both are investments are:
1. Can i easily rent it for a ROI? Even a small profit will do.
2. Will it be easy to rent? Who could be your potential renter.
3. Is it easy to maintain? Maintenance can bring you down. New roof, plumbing, paint, street plumbing (you would be surprised at what portion of main line to the street is your resposibility.
4. Older condo structures have higher hoa.

7   everything   2011 Dec 5, 2:11pm  

All I can say is wow to those prices, just think of the interest the banksters will get until you finally decide to foreclose, unless your moneybags, then go for it.
I was considering buying in the city, but I'm figuring many other U.S. cities will one day resemble the Detroit model.

8   SFace   2011 Dec 5, 5:40pm  

Within the boundary of a good location, I will only say that the third bedroom and second bathroom is extremely valuable and well worth the premium noted above. It's a siginificant jump from an apartment.

Everything is about incremental value and how much it costs to attain that value, you have to judge for yourself whether the extra cost is worth the value added.

I would only consider the two bedroom if it has expansion potential to get it into a 3/2. You do not want to be stuck with a 500K+ home that you do not want to live in subsequently for whatever reason. In five years, the market and price may not be where it needs to be and you generally don't want to rent 500K homes.

9   Wanderer   2011 Dec 6, 1:29am  

I'm surprised at the responses so far- I was pretty sure most people on this site would scoff at the idea that prices will rise within 5 years. I think if you're gonna buy, you need to either stay put over the long haul (more than 4-5 years) or be cash flow positive so you can rent your house and buy a second one.

10   bubblesitter   2011 Dec 6, 2:18am  

leo9 says

from 4-5 years from now but I am assuming by then the house prices will go up

This was assumed back in 2006. LOL. Nada. Think 10 years plus. If you plan on getting out in 5 years try renting instead of buying.

11   HousingWatcher   2011 Dec 18, 9:29am  

$570,000 for a 2 bedroom house? Where the heck are you buying? This must be one hell of an expensive area. To me, anything with less than 3 bedrooms is not even a real house. I'm surprised nobody has torn down all those 2 bedroom houses and repalced them with McMansions by now.

12   upisdown   2011 Dec 18, 12:34pm  

lol, but it's the low interst rate that supposedly makes it such a deal.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions