0
0

Mortgage rates hit low of 4.49 pct. (buy an overpriced house today!)


 invite response                
2010 Aug 5, 4:28am   10,103 views  36 comments

by PeopleUnited   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

Wow, most mortgages were only 20-25 years in the 1950's, and they had interest rates even lower than today. Sounds like this generation is going to have much more trouble with debt than the previous ones unless prices come down and incomes go up.

Alan Zibel, AP Real Estate Writer, On Thursday August 5, 2010, 10:47 am EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Mortgage rates dropped to the lowest level in decades for the sixth time in seven weeks, offering the most attractive opportunity for those who qualify to refinance or purchase a home.

Government-controlled mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday that the average rate for 30-year fixed loans this week was 4.49 percent, down from 4.54 percent last week. That's the lowest since Freddie Mac began tracking rates in 1971.

The average rate on the 15-year fixed loan dropped to 3.95 percent, down from 4 percent last week and the lowest on record.

Rates have fallen since spring as investors seek the safety of U.S. Treasury bonds. That has lowered the yield on Treasurys. Mortgage rates tend to track those yields.

The last time home loan rates were lower was during the 1950s, when most mortgages lasted just 20 or 25 years.

Low rates have sparked some activity in the weak housing market, but not a massive boom in refinancing.

Applications to refinance loans increased 1.3 percent and those to purchase homes increased 1.5 percent, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Nevertheless, high unemployment, slow job growth and tight credit have made it difficult for many to purchase homes. The housing industry received a boost this spring when the government offered homebuying tax credits, but housing activity has plummeted since they expired in April.

The number of buyers who signed contracts to purchase homes plunged in June to the lowest level on records dating back to 2001, according to the National Association of Realtors.

To calculate the national average, Freddie Mac collects mortgage rates on Monday through Wednesday of each week from lenders around the country. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a given day.

Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.63 percent, down from 3.76 percent a week earlier. Rates on one-year adjustable-rate mortgages fell to an average of 3.55 percent from 3.64 percent.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount. The nationwide fee for loans in Freddie Mac's survey averaged 0.7 a point for all loans.

#housing

« First        Comments 16 - 36 of 36        Search these comments

16   Jeremy   2010 Aug 8, 5:00am  

toothfairy says

When I see “record high” in the headlines to me it means “not going to last” or “at the turning point”
just like housing prices in 2007 were at a record high.

Housing prices were at a record high in 2004.......2005.......2006.....So just because the Titanic is taking on water, doesn't mean it's sunk......yet.

17   RayAmerica   2010 Aug 8, 5:08am  

Jeremy says

yet

One of the most meaningful little words in the English language.

18   schmitz_kris   2010 Aug 8, 5:22am  

RayAmerica says

On of the most meaningful little words in the English language.

especially for investors.

19   lwps   2010 Aug 8, 5:36am  

Most people in coastal California are signing up for a $1 million trip, when you add up all of the payments. That's a lot of money to rent, for nothing but a place to live.

20   Bap33   2010 Aug 8, 11:28am  

Nomo just keeps Ray honest. It's like Siskel and Ebert .. with benefits.

21   schmitz_kris   2010 Aug 8, 11:47am  

You are confused. The negativity did not precede the facts and figures - it's vice versa. Events in the financial markets CAUSED the negative opinions and sentiment to form, not the other way around.

There is nothing empty about any statement reflecting the seriousness of the present-day US economy. The situation is dire, and that is why money is flowing in the direction it is flowing.
Perhaps you are in possession of positive financial news the markets do not have? IF SO, FOR GOODNESS SAKE PLEASE GIVE IT TO THEM - we would all like to see US equities higher now than in 1998 or so and interest rates at the local bank at 7%.

Why do you think the FF rate is at 0-0.25? Why are we seeing treasury yields like this? Why are we seeing nearly ALL of the indicators that I mentioned (and many more that I did not go into)? It is because the situation is NEGATIVE.

22   EastCoastBubbleBoy   2010 Aug 8, 1:26pm  

If the economy is self-correcting, doesn't the constant government "help" only gum things up more?

We're still in the recession, and it has been 2.5 years and counting.

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

23   RayAmerica   2010 Aug 8, 1:32pm  

EastCoastBubbleBoy says

If the economy is self-correcting, doesn’t the constant government “help” only gum things up more?

Right on. The Government doesn't solve problems, government is the problem. Ronald Reagan hit it out of the park with that one because it is so full of truth. The TARP money went to the banksters to cover their toxic loans. The American people were told it was all about freeing up the credit markets. What a joke. Granted TARP started under Bush, et all (voted for by McCain & Obama), but it is being managed under Obama. This was nothing other than a money grab from taxpayers to pay off the banks for all their sloppy and often illegal lending practices and their multi-layered derivatives.

24   toothfairy   2010 Aug 8, 3:59pm  

I read somewhere that the FED indicated that they would rather err on the side of too much stimulus rather than too little.
So FF rate will not go up until the recovery is well underway.

25   tatupu70   2010 Aug 8, 10:06pm  

EastCoastBubbleBoy says

If the economy is self-correcting, doesn’t the constant government “help” only gum things up more?

The economy is not self-correcting.

26   pkowen   2010 Aug 9, 2:06am  

I got that Greenspan book as a gift when it came out. Makes a good doorstop.

27   cj   2010 Aug 10, 6:17am  

The only house I ever owned I purchased in 2000, with a 30-yr fixed rate of 8.5%. (I sold in summer of 2004 and started renting.)

Nothing seems so fundamentally different about the world now that rates couldn't go back to 8.5%. They were in that range for years, and it was no big deal. It would be no big deal again. If it happens, it will drastically cut how much of a loan people can qualify for.

I can't imagine how people with modest net worths can purchase a house now without being afraid of that. I have no idea whether rates are going to rise significantly from their current all-time lows, but it seems very possible. Owning a house now seems like owning a house without insurance against fire.

28   dcllee   2010 Aug 10, 9:00am  

I'll rather pay 12% than pay 4% at the current prices in the bay area.

29   inflection point   2010 Aug 10, 1:00pm  

With 1/8 the US population on food stamps I would suggest doomsday is approaching.

30   marko   2010 Aug 10, 4:47pm  

Yes I would like to buy an overpriced house. But only if it is magnificent and the entry way says "come on in daddy" - well that would be my criteria for buyin an overpriced house - cuz I could - and cuz I can

31   bubblesitter   2010 Aug 11, 1:27am  

I'd rather rent than buy a 600K piece of crap at 4%.

32   PeopleUnited   2010 Aug 11, 3:49am  

thunderlips11 says

It was compounded by the great easing of credit and the hyperfinancialization of the economy that really began to take off in the 1980s.

This I agree with. Debt is almost always bad, and in the 70's and 80's federal and private debt began to grow essentially exponentially. That is the core of our problem, we became a debtor nation and people.

thunderlips11 says

Many companies move to Canada from the US in order to get the health insurance - the cost of their tax payments is offset by the savings of not having to pay employee health care premiums.

I say let them go, anyone who trades freedom for "security" deserves neither and shall lose both. (btw how to you define "many"? haven't heard of mass migrations to the frozen north)

If you really want to understand when America was at the height of power and prosperity I suggest you look at "The Rise and Fall of the Dollar" posted today by Patrick. ?source=patrick.net

The height of American Power and prosperity in the past 100 years was roughly 1940-1950. After that debt and the warfare-welfare state forced the destruction of the dollar to the point where now husband and wife each working two jobs is often barely enough to get by and consumer and federal debts are crushing us all. In reality presidents and leaders on both sides of the aisle from FDR to present day have been leading America to destruction by debt and debasement of our currency.

33   vain   2010 Aug 11, 7:54am  

I think something big is happening. Me and 4 other friends that have offered on short sales on different dates, negotiating with different banks, were all responded to TODAY. It's strange. Do they know something that we don't?

34   I-man   2010 Aug 11, 11:50pm  

Why is it that every time there is a discussion about the future collapse of the US economy, it's all about finger-pointing and blame-shifting? Does it really matter who caused the problem? Does it matter what policies caused the problem? Does it matter who is in control of the government right now? No! All that matter is that something has to be done about it and soon.

The real story is the total failure of the government to make the hard decisions that will get us out of this mess. It's not a failure of the democrats or the republicans or the president or the supreme court, it's a systemic failure. And by extension, it's a failure of we, the people, because we elect the government.

As Johnny Rotten once said, "No one is innocent." So how about we get over the partisan bickering and start a meaningful discussion about how we are going to solve our problems? How about well-reason and rational suggestions instead of dogmatic bullshit that's been proven not to work? And finally, how about we take JFK's words to heart and "ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." instead of the "me-first" attitude that is rampant in today's society?

35   RayAmerica   2010 Aug 12, 2:42am  

I-man says

And finally, how about we take JFK’s words to heart and “ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.” instead of the “me-first” attitude that is rampant in today’s society?

Unfortunately, the private banksters of the Federal Reserve and the gangsters on Wall Street don't agree with any of that.

36   pkennedy   2010 Aug 12, 3:25am  

Both parties and all Americans think alike. From Liberal bay area residents to Redneck Texans. Their views are all identical. From the most liberal to the most conservative. Everything we do is hair splitting to differentiate them.

If you want to see different values and systems go to the remote mountains of Pakistan or Afghanistan. Those are different cultures. Those people have different views.

Our problems will correct themselves when they become emergencies. We're good at dealing with emergencies. Everything else is ignored. If we didn't ignore it, then every person on every street corner would be out there promoting their beliefs and what is wrong and we would be trying to "fix" ourselves. We only fix ourselves when it's an emergency, but when there are claims of said emergency, not when we appear to be heading towards said emergency, but when we're actually there.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions