patrick.net

The fact that so much work needs to be done leads me to believe whoever is selling it is in a rush to get rid of it........seems the seller doesn't have too much faith in the market............Yes....Sellers usually do know more about the market.

On pipes: they are rusty enough that if you’re out of town for a week, coffee comes out of the faucet. Needless to say, we always use a water filter

My mom had this a few years back. Hers were a combination of calcification and rust, read to fail in parts. Apparently steel pipes were in code for a period of time. She replaced with copper for around $10K.

Also, does the home have a slab floor? I've heard of some homes having plumbing in the slab. That would be a scary scenario to replace, imo.

"I have to go. I am still curious why he has to buy because of the kids?"

I know.....I never understand this....I have a kid, and I'd love to own a house, but there is way too much to lose if I were to buy now. I think the fact that someone has kids is more the reason to wait, kids are going to be hurt the most when you are in deep financial trouble, especially when theres a chance of losing the house. I remember when I was a child and my Father was in between jobs and we had to cut back on alot of things... I remember the heat had to be lowered and we all had to wear heavy clothing...and while my Mother tried to tell us what was going on and that we could lose the house, we were too young to understand...If you can't do it for yourself, at least do it for the kids!

"Since you plan to send your kids to private school anyway, wouldn’t it make more sense to look for properties in a transition neighborhood?"

I had this thought too. I would not pay the "good public school" premium for certain neighborhoods if I didn't intend to use the public schools. That's like paying for schools twice. I'd go someplace where you're paying for prime location or more house, rather than paying for schools you're not going to use anyway. I know you're considering it because of its effect on future resale value, but for a purchase this big, I really think the issue should be solely how the purchase suits *your* family for the long-term (but I don't think I'd call 6 years "long-term").

And with school funding propositions (like prop 76) up for vote, who knows how that will effect schools 6 years or more down the road. Maybe they will be better, or maybe all the public schools will be screwed up beyond recognition. It's hard to foretell how changes will affect things in the long-term. Sometimes there are unintended consequences.

The answer would be Yes-Yes-Yes; at least I itemize. I would think that anyone itemizes. I expect slow increases in value of 5% annually. I do not understand right away whether itemizing plays a role. Can you explain if it is not too off-topic?

If the tax deduction is changed into a 15% tax credit on interest of loan up to 300K, even those who do not itemize can benefit.

I know you itemize (of course). However do the typical buyers of 300K homes in Las Vegas (non-investors) itemize? If they do not itemize and then get a 15% tax credit from tax reform, your 300K properties may suddenly look 10-15% "underpriced" because the after tax cost for the same price will be lowered.

I am planning to buy a 700k house with a 35k (5%) down payment in the next few weeks due to the kids’ situation that I have.
What is your advice

We cannot give investment advice.

Personally, I think buying a primary residence is always feasible if the PITI for a 30-YR FRM does not exceed 30% of your household gross income. This is already a stretch, so be cautious. A safer way is to determine affordability using 15-YR FRM but get a 30-YR instead. Buffer is good.

Do not overlook property tax and HOA/insurance.

Also, do not assume that you can trade up in 3-5 years. Buy if you can comfortably afford a house that is adequate for the next 15 years.

It is funny. I talked with some friends from Czech and they think a 30-YR FRM is strange because it takes a good portion of your life to repay. They think 15-YR is more reasonable.

Okay... let's not talk about NAAVLPs.

I talked with some friends from Czech and they think a 30-YR FRM is strange because it takes a good portion of your life to repay.

right--a lot of Europeans hate massive, lingering debt.

right–a lot of Europeans hate massive, lingering debt.

I did not tell them about the Hell-lock financed "car (Hummer) loans" that are effectively 30 year long. :)

The housing market cannot go down because it is Hell-locked. :)

... if you still remember the *-locked jokes...

(Not investment advice)

$750k. she and her husband have no kids and are in their early 30s, household income about $120k.

Unless downpayment is significant (250K+), it is quite difficult to finance the mortgage with 120K.

How can people who only make $120k afford a $750k house?

It would represent a price to income ratio of 6.25, which is not unheard of in high-cost places like the SFBA. Many people stretch to get on the real estate boat that is said to be unsinkable.

4300sf is not a small house for 2. Is this a good time to get a dream house?

It really breaks my heart to see people having to work so hard for so little to live in the Bay Area. I'm not selling anything here but I wanted to show you what you can get in some other areas. I grew up in CA and lived there 40 years. I moved a few years ago to the Midwest - culture shock in some ways - yes, a better way of life with awesome schools, no traffic, wonderful people - yes.

It's not for everyone but maybe someone will see how they can have the American dream if they stop believing the hype of the Golden State.. I'm sorry to knock CA - it was my home for a long time and I have a lot of memories and miss some things ( like the weather) but it has gone downhill in my mind. I got to the point where I didn't want to go anywhere because I would be stuck in horrific traffic and the people were like mice in an endless maze.

Yeah, some people will make fun of midwestern states and that is okay - most have never been here - it can be a wonderful place to raise a family.

Tonight is an exciting night for us here - our first NBA game ever in history played tonight - Hornets against the Kings - can't wait!

http://tinyurl.com/dfczn

"for those of you with knowledge about the las vegas market, please chime in…should she buy or wait?"

All I can tell her is the force is not with her! Why would anyone want to buy right now....does your friend have a deathwish?

Perspective on ATM

Did you mean AMT?

yeah, it’s pretty crazy. all i can say is they made this decision after they decided that they would not have any kids. they were horrified when they did some back of the envelop calcs on what it takes to raise a kid and put him/her through college. anyone do a cost analysis on what it takes to raise a kid these days??

So it is fine to overspend on a house but not a kid?

I did a discounted cashflow analysis once and the net present value of having a kid is in the 200K range. I forgot the assumptions used.

" It is extremely unlikely they all get screwed up "

Oh sure, H.Z., get all logical on me, why don't you? ;-) You're right I overstated my case.

My son also just started kindergarten, in one of the poorer counties in the state. Funding sucks, there's not a lot of parent involvement, but I still think he's having a good experience. I think we probably place more importance than necessary on API scores and such. So long as it's a safe learning environment, I'm okay with it for now.

There's a hilarious article in the October (I think) Atlantic Monthly about California parents' obsession with API scores. Also includes some discussion of how this affects real estate prices, so it's not totally off topic. :-)

seattledude et. al...

Thanks a ton, but although I love Illinois but I'm not moving. That's fixed. And I've watched rent here since 1999. I sincerely doubt it's going to collapse - in fact rent will go up when the bubble bursts.

Given that my 'down the toilet' money (payment + taxes - tax savings - principle paid) is about the same as rent, then it seems to me that this isn't as nuts as it seems to some of you.

I mean, I build into my assumptions that I can make 5% after taxes. As someone pointed out, that's not a safe assumption. It's just a different risk.

But really, I guess it really boils down to 2 scenarios:

1) People *on the peninsula* (not SJ) are buying houses they can't really afford and setting themselves up for a big fall. If I wait long enough, there will be opportunity.

or

2) There are plenty of wealthy people that want to buy homes. Prices will continue to climb, albeit slowly. A $500k 3bdr house north of Santa Clara will never become a reality.

A $500k 3bdr house north of Santa Clara will never become a reality.

Portland, Oregon is north of Santa Clara and there are plenty of 3br houses under 500K.

"A $500k 3bdr house north of Santa Clara will never become a reality."

About 6 years ago (or was it 7?), it was a reality though. Good neighborhood with decent schools on the peninsula, you could get a 3 br 2 ba house in the high 400s. If you'd told me back then that that same house would be selling for around a million today, I would have told you you were crazy. In this market, the unbelievable becomes believable, and I think that applies to market correction as well as rising prices.

There are plenty of wealthy people that want to buy homes. Prices will continue to climb, albeit slowly.

This is a really bad assumption. I rather you have said "they are not making any more land".

People, especially the wealthy crowd, buy only if housing is a good investment. When the expectation is low, watch out.

While buying a house is a huge decision in and of itself, if you add kids to the equation, it’s a whole different ballgame.

True enough. :)

"2) There are plenty of wealthy people that want to buy homes. Prices will continue to climb, albeit slowly. A $500k 3bdr house north of Santa Clara will never become a reality."

You are totally missing a very big part of the picture! The fact that house prices rose so much has VERY LITTLE to do with people being wealthy. It has a whole lot to do with the creative financing that is now fading away. It also has to do with the "wealth effect" of the boomer generation that has convinced them that using equity in their house to buy another was a smart thing to do.

Things are changing right now, inventory of houses are rising, sellers are slashing their asking prices and still there are so few buyers.......Seems to me that the sellers are trying to bail out their sinking boats using a teaspoon....When it really starts to sink in and they make bigger cuts in their price, there will be an avalanche. I have seen RE signs in my neighborhood come down yet the post remained.....I figured they were probably thinking they will put the sign back up next spring......just recently I started to see those same signs go back up, I guess they are starting to realize as far as selling that it is now or never.

"In my experience what the parents do (not just say) have a lot more bearing on children’s education that anything else. "

I agree completely. My opinions on education are shaped mainly by having studied to become a teacher and having done observation and student teaching in various kinds of schools, from one rated highly in Virginia, and others that were rated poorly in the so-called 'hood. All that matters really is the parents.

I had a professor in college who said that the best value in education is a public one supplemented by strong parent involvement and supplementation at home, and that's always stuck with me. (I had another professor I respected who believed private schools were the only way to go, so clearly opinions vary ;-)).

There are plenty of wealthy people that want to buy homes. Prices will continue to climb, albeit slowly.

How about Hong Kong and Japan? Literally tons of money have been made in the two cities in prior equity and real estate booms. Those wealthy people apparently did not prevent a real estate meltdown.

"How about Hong Kong and Japan? Literally tons of money have been made in the two cities in prior equity and real estate booms. Those wealthy people apparently did not prevent a real estate meltdown."

.........and they are no longer wealthy!

I don’t think that’s a fair statement. In my view, having kids, like buying a house, is a privilege, not an obligation. Also, it’s quite a generality to imply that people who choose not to have kids are more superficial. I know of countless parents who are among the most superficial and materialistic people I know…and their kids are yet another trophy.

I agree with you. I am not even sure whether I can bear the responsibility of having kids. Cats are so much easier.

There are so many variable to raising a child in today’s world. It’s no longer a given that good parents = good child.

Absolutely.

My post for today:
Hard data on how much the bubble has driven up pricing in my area of SF Bay (Marin):
http://tinyurl.com/9vs2b

Price 1 is previous sale price (and date); price 2 is current price on MLS.

A tale of insanity and greed.

A tale of insanity and greed.

I await the panic and fear. :twisted:

I await the panic and fear.

"All good things come to those who wait..." ;)

"A tale of insanity and greed."

AAAAARRRRRRHGGGGGHHHH!

Thanks for the post, KurtS. Those price jumps make me sick, but it's still good info to have. ;-)

Thanks for the post, KurtS. Those price jumps make me sick, but it’s still good info to have...

Yes, it's frustrating, if we consider these prices permanent. However, I think this data clearly suggests serious price instability--that must correct itself. Btw, very few of these homes are actually selling

"they were horrified when they did some back of the envelop calcs on what it takes to raise a kid and put him/her through college."

Then they were probably looking for an excuse not to have kids. Trying to apply a monitary value to the experience is beyond my comprehension. There are plenty of valid reasons not to have kids, but cost seems like a pretty heartless one.

"anyone do a cost analysis on what it takes to raise a kid these days??"

I contend that it can cost a lot less than most people think. But I won't go off on that tirade again. :-P

If you buy the arguments in Freakonomics, a child’s success is primarily the result of being born to the right parents.

Do not underestimate the role of fate in one's life. I believe that success is 50% fate, 30% luck, and 20% hard work.

I believe that success is 50% fate, 30% luck, and 20% hard work.

Let me add that fate and luck are treating us pretty well already. Otherwise, we would be eating bugs in Sub-Saharan Africa. We should work hard.

"I await the panic and fear.

“All good things come to those who wait…” ;) "

.......and the meek shall inherit the earth.

But without the work part it will be hard for one to have the luck, to take advantage of the luck and to keep the luck.

Very true. But if fate and luck do not cooperate, life is futile.

How about Hong Kong and Japan? Literally tons of money have been made in the two cities in prior equity and real estate booms. Those wealthy people apparently did not prevent a real estate meltdown.

I don't know much about HK, but after reading the Japan section in 'Devil in the Hindmost' I am not confident that Japan is a predictor of what's to come in the USA. I used to think that people there took honestly earned money making superior products like Toyotas and that the RE boom and bust 'just happened'. But 'Devil' talks all about the endless government-backed literally "can't lose" financial schemes that everyone was part of. When that cracked, the economy fell apart. Had the housing boom been sustained by a realtively 'honest', uncorrupt economy, then I imagine the prices would not have plummetted.

The question goes back to the same thing...in the BA peninsula (because that's all I care about today):

1) Are people continuing to buy because they have money, make good money and expect to continue to do so?

Or

2) Are people irrationally buying?

And/or

3) Is the economy bound for a day of reckoning?

I can *almost* buy 3) in the sense that RE is fed by the RE industry ('the 40% of new jobs in RE' figure).

-mw

1) Are people continuing to buy because they have money, make good money and expect to continue to do so? No.

2) Are people irrationally buying? They buy "rationally" under extremely flawed assumptions.

3) Is the economy bound for a day of reckoning? Yes.