Just another win for President Trump and the American People. Leader of isis killed by US Special Forces in Raid authorized by President Trump
invite response
2019 Oct 26, 9:42pm 1,650 views 61 comments
by FuckTheMainstreamMedia ➕follow (3) 💰tip ignore
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-isis-leader-killed-in-trump-authorized-military-raid
« First « Previous Comments 38 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
38
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 28, 1:15pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 28, 1:15pm
Chiromancer says
Yes. Obama was dragged kicking and screaming to do something about ISIS.
They just had an Admiral from the Obama Admin on, literally minutes after Trump's announcement of the death of Al-Baghdadi, saying it was wrong and dangerous to call Baghdadi and "Dog", and that it would empower ISIS which is at the nadir of its strength under Trump, but their Apex under Obama and advisors like that Admiral.
There is nothing, nothing, Democrats won't stoop to.
When you understand that the Democrats are a Political Machine mostly belonging to the Clintons, and not much of a party anymore, it all becomes clear. Think of all those loyalists who served the coffee and picked up the dry cleaning, with powerful families, enraged they don't have their annointed place at the table. Even the controlled opposition at Bulwark is angry their natural rights to punditry and appointments have vanished.
Here's a great example: Medicare for all. The Dems have the House, so where are the bills? Medicare for All is completely non-controversial with the Dem Base.
Ok you believe that Pelosi, Shummer, Schiff not sure who the other Dem member of the gang of eight is, would put our military personel at significat risk for political gain.
Yes. Obama was dragged kicking and screaming to do something about ISIS.
They just had an Admiral from the Obama Admin on, literally minutes after Trump's announcement of the death of Al-Baghdadi, saying it was wrong and dangerous to call Baghdadi and "Dog", and that it would empower ISIS which is at the nadir of its strength under Trump, but their Apex under Obama and advisors like that Admiral.
There is nothing, nothing, Democrats won't stoop to.
When you understand that the Democrats are a Political Machine mostly belonging to the Clintons, and not much of a party anymore, it all becomes clear. Think of all those loyalists who served the coffee and picked up the dry cleaning, with powerful families, enraged they don't have their annointed place at the table. Even the controlled opposition at Bulwark is angry their natural rights to punditry and appointments have vanished.
Here's a great example: Medicare for all. The Dems have the House, so where are the bills? Medicare for All is completely non-controversial with the Dem Base.
39
Chiromancer
2019 Oct 28, 2:09pm
NoCoupForYou says
You wish, but no more, not by a long shot Bill is a walking corpse and Hil is, to quote your cult leader, a total loser. She couldn't beat an imbecile like Trump. But the repubs. are a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump, that is fact, but you like that.
When you understand that the Democrats are a Political Machine
You wish, but no more, not by a long shot Bill is a walking corpse and Hil is, to quote your cult leader, a total loser. She couldn't beat an imbecile like Trump. But the repubs. are a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump, that is fact, but you like that.
40
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 28, 2:31pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2019 Oct 28, 2:31pm
Chiromancer says
And yet, Biden raised less money despite frontrunner status and multi decades of being a good establishment stooge in the Senate, from big donors.
Warren and Bernie have outraised him.
And it's not uncommon for the frontrunner to disburse additional funds down to House and Senate campaigns.
They may have to run Hillary just to raise the money for the downline candidates.
You wish, but no more, not by a long shot Bill is a walking corpse and Hil is, to quote your cult leader, a total loser. She couldn't beat an imbecile like Trump. But the repubs. are a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump, that is fact, but you like that.
And yet, Biden raised less money despite frontrunner status and multi decades of being a good establishment stooge in the Senate, from big donors.
Warren and Bernie have outraised him.
And it's not uncommon for the frontrunner to disburse additional funds down to House and Senate campaigns.
They may have to run Hillary just to raise the money for the downline candidates.
48
Chiromancer
2019 Oct 28, 4:47pm
NoCoupForYou says
Not gonna happen, but dream on. It's funny Trump may get impeached because he thought Biden was his biggest threat, he was on paper. It's true they dont have a consensus candidate but its early. It won't be Clinton.
They may have to run Hillary
Not gonna happen, but dream on. It's funny Trump may get impeached because he thought Biden was his biggest threat, he was on paper. It's true they dont have a consensus candidate but its early. It won't be Clinton.
51
WookieMan
2019 Oct 28, 4:57pm
WookieMan
2019 Oct 28, 4:57pm
Chiromancer says
Who then? The Democratic field is a joke. There's not a viable candidate as someone that would like to see someone else besides Trump. There's nothing better right now and not ONE person running for the Dems is worthy. Even the Tulsi hype here is over the top. For fucks sake, she's from a state that has less population than Chicago or Houston. She couldn't even win mayor of those cities. Don't vote with your dicks patnetter's, that will always backfire. WHO is going to beat Trump?
Not gonna happen, but dream on. It's funny Trump may get impeached because he thought Biden was his biggest threat, he was on paper. But it's true they dont have a consensus candidate but its early. It won't be Clinton.
Who then? The Democratic field is a joke. There's not a viable candidate as someone that would like to see someone else besides Trump. There's nothing better right now and not ONE person running for the Dems is worthy. Even the Tulsi hype here is over the top. For fucks sake, she's from a state that has less population than Chicago or Houston. She couldn't even win mayor of those cities. Don't vote with your dicks patnetter's, that will always backfire. WHO is going to beat Trump?
52
Chiromancer
2019 Oct 28, 5:20pm
WookieMan says
Sure there is, they just are not doing well in the polls. Bullock, Benett, Kobachure, Harris are all Ok and could beat Trump. But if you are a Trump supporter now, you are correct none will fill the notion of Trumps polices without the lies and divisiveness. Tulsi who is every Trump lovers go to Dem. Is done. She can't even win her primary. And has lots of issues left unturned.
There's not a viable candidate as someone that would like to see someone else besides Trump. Ther
Sure there is, they just are not doing well in the polls. Bullock, Benett, Kobachure, Harris are all Ok and could beat Trump. But if you are a Trump supporter now, you are correct none will fill the notion of Trumps polices without the lies and divisiveness. Tulsi who is every Trump lovers go to Dem. Is done. She can't even win her primary. And has lots of issues left unturned.
55
Onvacation
2019 Oct 30, 6:54am
Onvacation
2019 Oct 30, 6:54am
Chiromancer says
No he didn't.
Trump was looking forward to debating that corrupt old liar who can't remember what he said 10 minutes earlier. It would have been more entertaining than when he crushed Hillary.
It's funny Trump may get impeached because he thought Biden was his biggest threat,
No he didn't.
Trump was looking forward to debating that corrupt old liar who can't remember what he said 10 minutes earlier. It would have been more entertaining than when he crushed Hillary.
56
Onvacation
2019 Oct 30, 6:58am
Onvacation
2019 Oct 30, 6:58am
Chiromancer says
Who? Harris is the one with name recognition, at least here in California, but she is just another not overly intelligent party hack who would lose in a debate with Trump.
Bullock, Benett, Kobachure, Harris are all Ok and could beat Trump.
Who? Harris is the one with name recognition, at least here in California, but she is just another not overly intelligent party hack who would lose in a debate with Trump.
57
Y
2019 Oct 30, 7:12am
Y
2019 Oct 30, 7:12am
Harris was a top tier candidate up to the point she announced she was a top tier candidate.
Once she announced that she transitioned into an entitled candidate, and we all know how that worked out with hillfuck...
Once she announced that she transitioned into an entitled candidate, and we all know how that worked out with hillfuck...
58
Y
2019 Oct 30, 7:21am
Y
2019 Oct 30, 7:21am
Government is run by the corporations.
Candidates are there to entertain the masses.
Once Melenia is gone Tulsi would be an adequate replacement.
WookieMan says
Candidates are there to entertain the masses.
Once Melenia is gone Tulsi would be an adequate replacement.
WookieMan says
Even the Tulsi hype here is over the top. For fucks sake, she's from a state that has less population than Chicago or Houston. She couldn't even win mayor of those cities. Don't vote with your dicks patnetter's, that will always backfire.
60
HeadSet
2019 Oct 30, 7:41pm
HeadSet
2019 Oct 30, 7:41pm
BlueSardine says
Actually, it seems that Tulsi was the one who took Harris out of top place during that first debate.
Harris was a top tier candidate up to the point she announced she was a top tier candidate.
Once she announced that she transitioned into an entitled candidate, and we all know how that worked out with hillfuck...
Actually, it seems that Tulsi was the one who took Harris out of top place during that first debate.
« First « Previous Comments 38 - 61 of 61 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,196,379 comments by 14,064 users - gabbar, stereotomy online now