« First « Previous Comments 4 - 30 of 30 Search these comments
That may seem a moral accusation, but I mean it merely as a psychological diagnosis based on the evidence. Unconstrained by any other value, he’ll say and do anything to win.
That Trump was elected should inspire, not hatred for Trump, but deep introspection and mea culpa from the elites that is still to this day completely missing
People voted for him because they were ass raped by both parties with immigration, trade for 35 yrs and cowed into compliance with political correctness and condescending moralizations like "if you're against immigration, you're a racist" (no possible other reasons), "if you're against trade, you don't understand economics.".
how terrible a candidate she was anyway
I personally think it was the racists that put Trump over the top.
This is exactly what I'm saying: anyone who is against mass unlimited immigration MUST be a racist.
Heraclitusstudent saysPeople voted for him because they were ass raped by both parties with immigration, trade for 35 yrs and cowed into compliance with political correctness and condescending moralizations like "if you're against immigration, you're a racist" (no possible other reasons), "if you're against trade, you don't understand economics.".
This may account for a decent number of people that voted for him.
I personally think it was the racists
This is exactly what I'm saying: anyone who is against mass unlimited immigration MUST be a racist.
Nothing like this happens on the right. Never. Not even once. Ever
So far the results of a Trump Presidency are overwhelmingly positive for the economy, the middle class, minorities, and business, and many spheres of awesomeness
Trump’s election was a referendum on Obama’s presidential reign of failure.
Curiosity overwhelms me where is this mythical mass unlimited immigration found for someone to be against?
when the whole world is in opposition to your ideology and policiesIt's a pretty good indication we're on the right track.
Feux Follets sayswhen the whole world is in opposition to your ideology and policiesIt's a pretty good indication we're on the right track.
People who don't the GENIUS in that must violently ram their heads into walls over and over again SCREAMING those magic wordsWas this supposed to be a sentence?
How many is this? 12 millions illegals immigrants? this is not mass immigration?
Sanctuary cities/states: these are not steps to deliberately refuse to enforce any immigration laws? Leading... to immigration unlimited by laws?
2) Too much political correctness, which makes little sense, except with repect to the most extreme SJWs who are shunned sufficiantly by the mainstream
The fact that he lies all the time just means he understands that the core of politics is not based on truthful utterances but emotional ones
I personally think it was the racists that put Trump over the top. And no, this isn't saying that you Trump fanboys here on this forum are racists. I don't really know one way or the other about that.
I personally think it was the racists that put Trump over the top. And no, this isn't saying that you Trump fanboys here on this forum are racists. I don't really know one way or the other about that.
Except you are wrong about it being shunned by the mainstream.
Under international treaties and its own laws, the United States is obliged to allow foreigners inside the country or at its ports of entry to apply for asylum. It’s a daunting process, beginning with a “credible fear” interview to determine if there’s evidence that the applicant faces persecution or death back home. If the applicant passes that, the next step is plunging into an immigration court system that can take years to reach a decision. More than three-quarters of asylum-seekers from the northern triangle who came before the court were rejected from 2011 to 2017, according to TRAC, a research institute at Syracuse University.
Those in the caravans know this, since they are generally accompanied on their trek by organizers who lay out their options. This spring, about 700 people left the Mexican town of Tapachula, on the Guatemalan border, on March 25. Their ranks eventually swelled to about 1,200, from infants to the elderly. Most chose to remain in Mexico, which, despite a flawed asylum program, has become a favored destination for migrants. About 300 continued to Tijuana. Organizers and lawyers told about 200, mostly children, that they had a chance to gain asylum after applying at the San Ysidro crossing into San Diego.
Organizations that monitor immigration say American officials have come up with a variety of tactics to discourage asylum-seekers. One is to separate family members; another, attempted with the current caravan, is to claim that the port of entry has “reached capacity.” (Attorney General Jeff Sessions began to address that on Wednesday by sending more Justice Department lawyers and judges to process cases at the border.)
Finally, 24 hours after they arrived, the first group of eight migrants — three mothers with four children and an 18-year-old man — were allowed to apply for asylum on Monday evening. There was no telling how many would be allowed to follow.
Meanwhile, as this trickle began, the president roared on Twitter: “The migrant ‘caravan’ that is openly defying our border shows how weak & ineffective U.S. immigration laws are.”
The vetting of the caravan, in fact, shows that the immigration laws are quite strict, and that they work. That Mr. Trump says otherwise shows he sees not a group of fearful people fleeing from terror to freedom, but an opportunity to fan the flames of bigotry.
www.youtube.com/embed/XRXLmhrm4OI