« First « Previous Comments 74 - 76 of 76 Search these comments
but sounds like just another lame spin attempt to justify the violation of the Second Amendment to remove firearms from the public.
Quite the marksman to hit a fast-moving target 2500 feet away.
Ceffer says
This would be funny if true, but sounds like just another lame spin attempt to justify the violation of the Second Amendment to remove firearms from the public. Never let a good propaganda opportunity pass you by, especially when you otherwise look like incompetent dolts. Was this AI spin as well? AI wouldn't have the value judgment to know it was shooting itself in the microchips.
Quite the marksman to hit a fast-moving target 2500 feet away. Lead the target and account for droppage. That would be hard to do even with tracer fire.
« First « Previous Comments 74 - 76 of 76 Search these comments
I could see if it was flying a few hundred feet off the ground under total Emmissions Control on a mission, but on a flight in the US?
Furthermore, there were TWO planes on the mission. The wingman didn't not the time and place of the bailout, and then they could calculate the trajectory of the plane from there?
More to this story than what we're being told.