▲
4
0
▼

SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Icelandic Children. Close Follow-Up of All Confirmed Cases in a Nationwide Study.


               
2022 Jul 31, 5:46am   319 views  10 comments

by Al_Sharpton_for_President   follow (6)  

To conclude, this is a nationwide study on the symptoms in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection and describes the symptoms of all children tested positive through rigorous tracing and testing. This study helps shed light on the true frequency of complications in pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections and supports the observation that COVID-19 disease in children generally causes nonsevere symptoms and despite around half the cases were during a delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, no hospital admissions were needed although transmission was clearly more potent than in previous variant.

https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Fulltext/9900/SARS_CoV_2_Infections_in_Icelandic_Children__Close.124.aspx

Outcomes among Icelandic children infected with covid:
Asymptomatic 21%
Mild Symptoms 74%
Moderate symptoms without medical care 4%
Moderate symptoms with medical care 1%
Severe Symptoms 0%
Hospitalized 0%
Deaths 0%



« First        Comments 9 - 10 of 10        Search these comments

9   mell   2022 Jul 31, 9:36am  

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

richwicks says


FuckTheMainstreamMedia says



I continue to be baffled at recommendations for Covid vaccines in children, the need to isolate, the need to shut down schools.

I don’t understand why anyone is advocating for any of that. It doesn’t make any sense at all.


It's a test of how compliant the population is. It would hardly be a test if it made any sense.

Teachers, whose job is to be educated and to educate promote this insanity, they aren't on strike are they? Although they could. Why do you let your kids be educated by these obvious incompetents?



If I were young and intending to have a family, I would leave California and move to a place where we could afford to live without my wife working and could homeschool the kids. California is an absolute shitho...

Easier said than done. The rural beauty and climate is incredibly hard to find, as are states which don't tax you much along the coast line. We love the coast so we wil likely enjoy it a few more years. Also planning on spending a year overseas, maybe longer. Not worried about house prices and we'd likely rent out the place. But if anyone has good info on pros and cons on east coast states, thinking Maine, Connecticut, New Hampshire, always appreciated. Portland ME vs CT shoreline etc.
10   richwicks   2022 Jul 31, 12:46pm  

mell says


Easier said than done. The rural beauty and climate is incredibly hard to find, as are states which don't tax you much along the coast line. We love the coast so we wil likely enjoy it a few more years.


I recommend you find a lake. They are all up north, but a lake front property in Wisconsin or Michigan isn't terribly expensive, but you don't want to be there in winter. You can go south then.

My aunt has waterfront property on a river in NY - she's in Florida during the summer. Her "house" on the waterfront is a CABIN, not habitable during the winter, no insulation. Pipes have to be blown out to prevent them from bursting, power turned off, abandoned during the winter. But it's beautiful in the summer.

Ocean sucks, it's caustic, everything corrodes. West coast, the water is cold and it sucks. Ocean front property is highly over-rated. The ocean is nothing more than the cesspool of the Earth.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste