8
2

Russian Black Sea Fleet is practically neutered.


               
2022 May 9, 11:06am   37,978 views  263 comments

by Eric_Holder   follow (0)  


After the dramatic sinking of the missile-cruiser Moskva by a Ukrainian missile battery on April 14, the Russian Black Sea Fleet is down to just three major surface combatants. The best and most important of them might be the new missile-frigate Admiral Makarov.
...

On Thursday and Friday there were reports the Ukrainians had landed a blow with a Neptune and the frigate was on fire. There was no immediate hard evidence to back up the rumors, although one blurry video that circulated online does seem to depict a warship in flames.

Commissioned in 2017, Admiral Makarov is the third, last and most modern vessel in her class. All three of the Admiral Grigorovich-class frigates belong to the Black Sea Fleet. Armed with 24 Buk medium-range surface-to-air missiles and eight Kalibr cruise missiles, all in vertical cells, the frigates can escort other vessels and also attack targets on land.

Admiral Makarov and her sisters are not big ships. Displacing just 4,000 tons of water and accommodating 200 crew, they’re less than half the size of the U.S. Navy’s main surface combatants, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.

But the frigates are about as big as Russia can make a non-nuclear surface combatant these days, for reasons that—ironically—have everything to do with the current war. Throughout the Soviet era and for years after the USSR’s collapse, Russia acquired its big marine engines from Ukraine.

After Russia in 2014 invaded and annexed Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula—including the port of Sevastopol where Admiral Makarov now is based—Kyiv barred certain exports to Russia, including the marine engines Russia requires for any fast, conventional vessel displacing more than 5,000 tons or so.

Which is to say, after 2014 the Russian navy struggled to build big warships. That made it impossible to replace, like for like, the biggest Soviet-vintage ships such as Moskva, which displaced 12,000 tons.


...

Moskva’s sinking, along with the earlier destruction of the Black Sea Fleet landing ship Saratov following an apparent hit by a Ukrainian ballistic missile, spooked fleet commanders. They pulled back the surviving surface ships.

Many, including one Admiral Grigorovich-class frigate—it’s not clear which—were moored in Sevastopol as recently as Thursday. When the warships do sail from Crimea, they tend to stay 100 miles or so from the Ukrainian coast, potentially keeping them beyond the range of Kyiv’s Neptunes.

Keeping at a safe distance meant the frigates apparently were in no position to help when the Ukrainian navy last week mounted a furious drone assault on the Russian garrison on Snake Island. The tiny hunk of rock, 25 miles off the coast of southwestern Ukraine, helped Kyiv assert some control over the western Black Sea—until the Russians captured it on the first full day of the current war on Feb. 24.

Ukrainian TB-2 drones knocked out Russian air-defenses on the island then went hunting deeper at sea. On Monday, a TB-2 struck two Russian Raptor-class patrol boats with laser-guided missiles, heavily damaging if not destroying both of the 55-foot boats as they motored toward Snake Island.

Without the protection of a frigate, the Raptors were sitting ducks. In that sense, sinking Moskva—and scaring off the rest of the Black Sea Fleet’s major combatants—was as good as sinking the frigates, too. It doesn’t matter that Russia still has three powerful warships in the Black Sea if those ships can’t, or won’t, risk approaching the Ukrainian coast.
...



https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/05/06/the-russian-frigate-admiral-makarov-might-be-the-juiciest-target-in-the-black-sea/?sh=5439ecbb74d5&source=patrick.net

« First        Comments 247 - 263 of 263        Search these comments

247   WookieMan   2024 Jan 3, 2:35pm  

rocketjoe79 says

WookieMan says


PeopleUnited says



The bear lives half way around the world. Why do we insist on poking the bear?

The bear is mean. But poking the bear is mean too. Don’t poke the bear!

Agree we shouldn't be involved. I think you got the animal wrong. The mouse. Don't poke the mouse.


Russia Defense Spend 2023: $100 Bn (previous to War, <$60Bn)
USA Defense Spend 2023: $817 Bn!!!

And? That's our defense budget and Russia's. Not getting the point?

We took out two nations in months and basically policed them for 2 decades and lost as many people as we did in Chicago over the same time period. Less actually. They were dumb wars, but we didn't lose them technically and they were across the globe. I don't know, I think almost $100B is more than $6B for Ukraine. My math could be wrong. By any metric both sides have lost waaaaay more than we did in Afghanistan or Iraq combined. This is a war of losers and idiots.

Comparing the budget numbers just means we have more money? Is that a complaint? If Russia cannot beat a neighboring country with $6B in defense spending, they're a paper tiger by default. They're losing men and have no clue how to keep their natural resources running. I don't care about our funding as most of that is going to corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs. Not weapons.

And as woke as our military is becoming and growing smaller, without nukes, we'd destroy Russia in a conventional war. 100%. China can at least send a hot air balloon over here. Russia cannot demolish its neighbor with supposedly the 2nd strongest military on the planet.
248   Booger   2024 Jan 3, 3:46pm  

WookieMan says

Russia cannot demolish its neighbor with supposedly the 2nd strongest military on the planet.


Russia is the second strongest military...in Ukraine.
249   Bd6r   2024 Jan 3, 5:54pm  

Booger says

WookieMan says


Russia cannot demolish its neighbor with supposedly the 2nd strongest military on the planet.


Russia is the second strongest military...in Ukraine.

And both of militaries fighting in Ukraine are weaker than Polish military by far.
250   Eric_Holder   2024 Feb 1, 1:46pm  

A bit of fun reading from good old 2013:

The Russian fleet, which the day before conducted military exercises off the coast of Syria, was practicing intercepting cruise missiles with characteristics similar to American Tomahawk-type missiles. This is reported by the American portal about the US Marine Corps. According to the source cited by the authors, the Russians demonstratively conducted exercises and conducted part of the negotiations on open radio frequencies, showing that it was not difficult for them to destroy American missiles.

Meanwhile, the command of the Russian Navy did not provide any official information about the type of exercise.

Let us recall that the United States fears that Russia will transmit to Syria all information about the situation at sea and in the air, which will significantly complicate American aggression against Syria.

One of these days, the “aircraft carrier killer” missile cruiser “Moskva” will approach the shores of Syria, and in addition to it, the Black Sea Fleet patrol ship “Smetlivy” will approach the shores of Syria in the near future. On September 29, two more Black Sea Fleet ships will arrive in the area of the Syrian coast: the missile boat “Ivanovets” and the small missile ship “Shtil”. On Friday, a detachment of ships, including the BDK Novocherkassk (Black Sea Fleet) and Minsk (Baltic Fleet), as well as the reconnaissance ship Priazovye (Black Sea Fleet), passed the Dardanelles and became available to the command of the Mediterranean squadron, RIA Novosti reports. http:/ /telegrafist.org/2013/09/11/86228/

In any case, the Russian fleet, regardless of the surrounding situation, will scan the sea and air space in the area where the fleet is deployed. At the same time, as information has already flashed in the media, Russia, in theory, can transfer this information to the Syrian air defense.

Syria is armed with the latest Russian Pantsir-S1 air defense systems, which are capable of destroying American Tomahawk-type cruise missiles. The Pantsir air defense missile system was (and still is, apparently) designed primarily to combat incoming Tomahawk-type cruise missiles and low-flying (maneuvering) enemy targets that for some reason broke through the air defense barrier. Tests of the Pantsir have shown that the complex is capable of shooting down low-flying missiles, including at a record low altitude of 15 meters. http://telegrafist.org/2013/09/11/86228/


RED FLEET SO STRONK!
251   Booger   2024 Feb 1, 4:37pm  

Another Russian ship sunk today! Ukraine used 4 drones to do it.
253   Booger   2024 Mar 5, 4:03pm  

Ship built in 2021 just went down near Kerch bridge.
254   RWSGFY   2024 Mar 25, 8:02am  

Minus 2 Ropucha-class landing ships...

When that bridge finally goes down there will be no way to resupply or even pull out the troops stuck on that peninsula ... scratch that ... island. Will the Reds cosplay Dunkirk then?
255   socal2   2024 Mar 25, 8:07am  

“ITS A LAND WAR!!”
256   MolotovCocktail   2024 Mar 25, 8:09am  

socal2 says

“ITS A LAND WAR!!”


Yes. It is. Nice you came on board with reality.
257   RWSGFY   2024 Mar 25, 8:17am  

UkraineIsTotallyFucked says


socal2 says


“ITS A LAND WAR!!”


Yes. It is. Nice you came on board with reality.



I agree: it IS a land war now, but it didn't start like that. There was a serious threat of landing operation. No more. Then there was a naval blockade. No more. So one of the poisonous teeth have been completely removed from that Red snake.
258   Eric_Holder   2025 Dec 15, 1:32pm  

After neutering came throatfucking: one of remaining Kilo-class submarines have been blown up by an underwater drone inside Novorossiysk navy base. It was used to lobe Kalibr cruise missiles into civilian apartment blocks. No more of that shit.

To add insult to the injury the video feed was translated from a cameras installed in the Black Sea Fleet .... err .... flotilla HQ.
259   AmenCorner_AntiPanican   2025 Dec 15, 2:20pm  

Russia is pretty much done. Putin should sent Dugin to Siberia. Ukraine will be an EU low-cost manufacturing/exploitation zone.

Better for the West to exploit Ukraine for cheap labor than bring in Jawas on Dawahs.
261   zzyzzx   2025 Dec 16, 6:42am  

Given the relatively small number of Russian submarines in the Crimea, I have to either conclude one of the following:
1. Making a submersible drone is actually pretty easy.
2. Ukraine was highly motivated to make a weapon just to take out a small number of one type of weapon, or maybe it's potentially useful on ships as well.
3. It's a rebranded weapon made by someone else, and someone else wanted to test their weapon in a real life combat situation.
262   MolotovCocktail   2025 Dec 16, 8:37am  

Eric_Holder says

After neutering came throatfucking: one of remaining Kilo-class submarines have been blown up by an underwater drone inside Novorossiysk navy base. It was used to lobe Kalibr cruise missiles into civilian apartment blocks. No more of that shit.

To add insult to the injury the video feed was translated from a cameras installed in the Black Sea Fleet .... err .... flotilla HQ.


Do you get paid to post Ukey propaganda here?

https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2231014
263   MolotovCocktail   2025 Dec 16, 8:39am  

zzyzzx says

Given the relatively small number of Russian submarines in the Crimea, I have to either conclude one of the following:
1. Making a submersible drone is actually pretty easy.
2. Ukraine was highly motivated to make a weapon just to take out a small number of one type of weapon, or maybe it's potentially useful on ships as well.
3. It's a rebranded weapon made by someone else, and someone else wanted to test their weapon in a real life combat situation.


4. It's just Ukey propaganda bullshit Eric_Holder posted here on PatNer:

https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2231014

« First        Comments 247 - 263 of 263        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste