patrick.net

https://www.malone.news/p/ukraine-biolabs-update?triggerShare=true

The first of these articles raised the question of whether military action by the Russian Federation to destroy these facilities would be justified, with an analogy drawn to the question of what would be the likely actions of the US Military if it were determined that analogous biological infectious disease research laboratories funded by a global competitor (such as China) were to be discovered in Northern Mexico.

After these articles were published, I was contacted by an active Air Force LTC-rank officer who had direct visibility/intelligence on the early events of the Ukraine conflict that the bombing and destruction via air of those laboratories, attributed by US Corporate media to Russian air force action, was performed by the US Air Force. The implication is that the USG either actively destroyed evidence or acted to prevent the armed forces of the Russian Federation from acquiring information and resources (potentially including biological specimens) from those laboratories. ...

The U.S. has long dismissed claims about the biological research laboratories in Ukraine as "Russian propaganda," until senior State Department official Victoria Nuland unexpectedly confirmed their existence at a 2022 Senate hearing under questioning by Senator Marco Rubio.

Yawn: moving goalposts from weaponisation (which is a problem) to research (which is not) as proof of any weaponisation efforts has failed to emerge. Clown world.

This is the sign that even the most rabid proponents of bioWEAPONSlabs has dropped the claim and now trying to reframe the issue.