10
0

Masks Control People, Not Viruses


 invite response                
2021 Apr 20, 8:45am   102,992 views  948 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/?source=patrick.net


Published online 2020 Nov 22.

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Baruch Vainshelboim⁎

Abstract
Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making. ...

Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.



« First        Comments 842 - 881 of 948       Last »     Search these comments

847   stereotomy   2023 Sep 8, 11:49am  

I've had personal experiences where I've been exposed to hundreds of vax-shedding sheeple. After my exposure, I started to feel covid-like symptoms. I realized that all these people were shedding spike proteins. Needless to say, I hit the ivermectin, and after 3 days, I felt great.

Ivermectin only inhibits viral replication, it does not kill the virus. If you become infected, take the 'mectin for 7-10 days so that your immune system can completely eradiate the virus.
848   Patrick   2023 Sep 8, 9:35pm  

For the memes:


857   Patrick   2023 Sep 15, 11:12am  

https://vigilantnews.com/post/mask-toxicity-german-study-exposes-dangers-of-co2-re-breathing-neuron-death-learning-impairment


Not only does masking not work on coronaviruses or influenza viruses, but masking causes real harm to vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children and adolescents.

The harm being caused by masking is very serious. Even a few minutes of wearing a surgical, cloth or N95 mask and you initiate the following long term damages:

children - irreversible neuron damage, neuron destruction, increased anxiety, impaired learning and memory
adolescents - testicular toxicity
pregnant women - stillbirths, fetal malformations, post implantation loss, lower probability of viable fetuses
859   HeadSet   2023 Sep 18, 5:50am  

Red Drum is a species of fish around here. What is that pic above?
865   Patrick   2023 Sep 27, 2:09pm  

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-were-such-terrible-approaches


When COVID first started, there were a variety of unknowns about the virus. One of the most important ones was if it had a droplet or aerosol spread. Some viruses, like influenza (the flu) spread through being attached to water droplets, and for those viruses, “targeting” water droplet spread to varying degrees mitigates their transmission.

For example, while viruses are infinitely smaller than the gaps in a cloth mask, water droplets are not, so if someone wears a cloth mask, the cloth fiber will inhibit the expulsion of water droplets from the mask wearer, and by extension the degree to which they spread influenza. Likewise, the distance water droplets can travel is limited to around 6 feet, as the droplets quickly fall to the ground, so maintaining distance between people reduces the spread of those viruses. Finally, droplet with viruses will attach to surfaces, after which point, they can be picked up by someone physically touching the surface.

Conversely, if a virus is aerosolized (meaning it freely floats in and travels through the air), none of the above applies. Instead it will spread everywhere, hang around in the air long after someone has left, and penetrates most of the barriers designed to block it. Aerosolized pathogens are thus known to be much more contagious and the hospitals have much stricter isolation protocols to prevent their spread within the hospital (tuberculosis and measles are the two classic pathogens known for this).

As it so happened, from the start of the pandemic, there was very strong evidence COVID-19 spread through aerosols—for example at the end of January 2020, the Diamond Princess cruise ship experienced one of the earliest COVID outbreaks and was quarantined. The outbreak on the ship was closely studied by experts around the world as it had inadvertently provided the perfect experimental conditions to study how COVID-19 was transmitted. One of the many observations made was that people who remained in their rooms caught COVID-19, which suggested the virus was spreading through the ventilation system and was thus aerosolized.
866   PeopleUnited   2023 Oct 4, 8:54pm  

Our workplace is “strongly encouraging” masking “due to the increasing number of cases” in recent weeks. It seems like the powers that be are hell bent on stealing another election through mail in vote fraud so they are ramping up the fear yet again.
867   GNL   2023 Oct 5, 4:43am  

PeopleUnited says

Our workplace is “strongly encouraging” masking “due to the increasing number of cases” in recent weeks. It seems like the powers that be are hell bent on stealing another election through mail in vote fraud so they are ramping up the fear yet again.

Do you see any other companies following suit yet?
875   Patrick   2023 Nov 3, 9:24am  

https://californiaglobe.com/fl/mask-mandates-ordered-again-in-californias-alternate-universe/


In Santa Clara County, everyone — patients, caregivers and healthcare providers — will be required to wear face masks in public patient care areas in hospitals, clinics, and long term care facilities for the “winter respiratory virus period,” starting Nov. 1 and lasting five months through the end of March.
881   BeneTiberCato   2023 Nov 14, 9:21pm  

Patrick says





There's some lurking problem's in Cheryl's marriage, but ignorance is bliss.

« First        Comments 842 - 881 of 948       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions