11
0

Masks Control People, Not Viruses


               
2021 Apr 20, 8:45am   144,932 views  1,014 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/?source=patrick.net


Published online 2020 Nov 22.

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Baruch Vainshelboim⁎

Abstract
Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making. ...

Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.



« First        Comments 1,013 - 1,014 of 1,014        Search these comments

1013   Patrick   2026 Jan 16, 10:24am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/turns-and-tides-friday-january-16


Governor Ron DeSantis has now named six of the state’s seven current high court justices. That’s good enough, but it was much better than it even appears. Yesterday’s appointment was of perhaps my personal favorite appellate judge, Adam Tanenbaum, whom the paper described as “a staunch conservative.”

It’s only January, but I will already award the label “staunch conservative” the prize for understatement of the year. Even though Judge Tanenbaum recently ruled against me in a local elections case, I will never forget the very first time he ruled in my favor: my successful mask case. Here’s my favorite paragraph from his order, where Judge Tanenbaum described Alachua County’s mask ordinances as “diktaks”:




If you’ve never read Judge Tanenbaum’s order, you’ll love it. Here is a link from my personal dropbox. It wasn’t always easy to find. The big legal databases refused even to assign the opinion a citation number for two years. They covered the story up to the ruling, but not much afterwards. ...

The significance of Tanenbaum’s mask decision, rendered the following June, has never been fully appreciated. This was the very first case (and to this day, I believe, the only mask case) where an appellate court in the United States ruled against one of the central pandemic mitigation policies on constitutional grounds. Even though it wiped out mandatory masking in 33 counties in Florida, and caused the rest of the Sunshine State’s 67 counties to begin quietly retreating from their own mask orders, media stubbornly refused to report on it.

But the damage, as they say, was done. It was a game-changer. All across the country, news spread among lawyers who were fighting pandemic rules: it was possible to win. It encouraged more lawyers to join the fight. It began turning the tide. Just two months later, on the strength of my mask victory, I won the nation’s first broad injunction against a municipal “vaccinate or terminate” mandate.

The lawsuits began to multiply, and you know the rest of the story. The pushback took time to pick up speed, but for the pandemic powers, it was all downhill from this key case, judicially speaking.

As you can imagine, even though Judge Tanenbaum’s order carefully skirted the radioactive issue of whether the useless things work or not, he still took furious flak and was savaged over his “anti-masking” decision. After all, at the time, it was June, 2021— the peak of mask and vaccine mania. He was the first appellate judge to rule against any significant pandemic policy. To say the least, it required a rare kind of selfless, heroic bravery.

But now, Governor DeSantis, bless him, has elevated this courageous and brilliant jurist to the Florida Supreme Court, over a wide field of competition. Both Governor DeSantis and Judge Tanenbaum deserve substantial credit for turning the tide and ending the pandemic nightmare. Once again, I thank them both on everyone’s behalf.

« First        Comments 1,013 - 1,014 of 1,014        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste