« First « Previous Comments 2,199 - 2,237 of 2,237 Search these comments

Yesterday’s New York Times featured an anguished story headlined, “Justice Department Will Monitor Elections in California and New Jersey.” The article was a hysterical, over-the-top reaction to what even it admitted was not news.
“The Justice Department will monitor polling sites in California and New Jersey ahead of the Nov. 4 election,” the Times reported, “to ensure transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law.” This, the Times felt, “will likely heighten tensions as voters weigh in on some of the nation’s most closely watched races.”
It will heighten tensions if the Times has anything to say about it, that is.
November’s cool weather also delivers a few off-year elections. In California, voters will decide Proposition 50, which seeks to amend the state’s constitution to let the Golden State bypass its independent mapping agency and gerrymander five new Democrat districts before next year’s Congressional midterms. ...
“Deploying these federal forces appears to be an intimidation tactic meant for one thing: suppress the vote.”
Neither the Times nor Gavin Newsom’s spokesmoron quoted a single person who felt intimidated by the DOJ observers, or even suggested who those people might be. Maybe gnomes, or headless horsemen. The answer was left, apparently, to partisan readers’ hyperactive imaginations.
The only “news” was that, after receiving specific and detailed complaints from Republican elections officials, the DOJ said it will send an unspecified number of poll watchers to five counties in California and one in New Jersey. Only six counties.
The complaints were textbook election issues. For example, New Jersey’s GOP complained to the DOJ after Democrat members of the Passaic County Board of Elections blocked the use of security cameras in ballot storage areas and refused to require a sign-in log for workers with access to mail-in ballots. (Of course.)
The DOJ is just doing its job; responding to official complaints from a handful of counties. That’s it, that’s the whole story. But it was enough to provoke panic and hysteria among Democrats, although the article itself admitted that there is nothing whatsoever unusual about the DOJ’s announcement.
“Election monitoring by the Justice Department is not uncommon,” the Times finally conceded. “Election officials say such monitoring has been conducted in the past under both Republican and Democratic administrations,” it continued, adding that just two years ago, “in 2022, under the Biden administration, the DOJ monitored compliance with federal voting rights laws in 64 jurisdictions in 24 states.”
Even LA County’s registrar responded with an inoffensive statement, saying that federal monitors, “like all election observers,” were welcome, and adding that “the presence of election observers is not unusual and is a standard practice across the country.”
The article even confessed that, shockingly, in last November’s election, 81% of voters in California used mail-in ballots, raising questions about who exactly would even be there to be intimidated. The Times noted darkly that, “MAGA Republicans have maintained a relentless focus on voter fraud and have trained election observers to aggressively search for possible irregularities at polling places.” We’re all praying that’s true, and I’ll bet that’s another 80/20 issue in the GOP’s favor.
81% of voters in California used mail-in ballots











AG Bonta, SOS Weber Celebrate Appellate Decision Striking Down Huntington Beach’s Voter ID Law
Californians can’t do anything without an ID – except vote ...
Requiring Voter ID is disenfranchising voters according to California’s Attorney General.
How about the state Motor-Voter law? Offering voter registration opportunities at the California Department of Motor Vehicles has caused many Californians to question the integrity of our election system, and most of those would gladly show ID to vote.
The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether federal law prohibits states from counting ballots that arrive after Election Day.
President Donald Trump has long railed against mail-in voting and has argued that allowing ballots to be counted after Election Day creates opportunities for fraud. He’s claimed that the practice undermines voter confidence by making it impossible to quickly announce final results.
However, the laws of about 30 states authorize counting mail-in ballots after Election Day, with officials contending that the grace period aids voters — including military personnel — whose ballots are delayed for reasons outside their control.
The Supreme Court announced in a routine order list Monday that it will grant review in challenges the Republican National Committee and the Mississippi Libertarian Party filed against that state’s law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within five business days after the election.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the challengers and struck down the Mississippi law last year, holding that it is at odds with a trio of federal laws establishing a uniform, nationwide day for voting in federal elections.
We're Not Making This Up: Watch Jasmine Crockett Warn Trump Could Use Dominion Voting Machines to Rig Election
https://www.westernjournal.com/not-making-watch-jasmine-crockett-warn-trump-use-dominion-voting-machines-rig-election/
We're Not Making This Up: Watch Jasmine Crockett Warn Trump Could Use Dominion Voting Machines to Rig Election
Good! Now both sides want voting machines eliminated, right?




Indeed, you have a lot to be thankful for this week of humble national gratitude — for instance, the explosive new revelations as to just exactly how US elections have been rigged, and how, it now appears, Mr. Trump and his people, are prepared to go mad-dog on the sinister forces behind it. ...
Eminent DC attorney Sidney Powell had conniptions over the Kraken in the months after the 2020 election that ushered senile (let’s just say it) “Joe Biden” into the Oval Office for four disastrous years. (After which, Sidney Powell was methodically defamed and prosecuted by mysterious forces.)
Ms. Powell threatened to “release the Kraken,” meaning: a malign combine out of Venezuela had managed to foist Dominion vote tabulation machines all over the USA, but especially in swing vote states, along with Smartmatic software. And all this janky machinery was connected by the Internet through Serbia to the CCP, or something like that. And that this machinery, plus massive voter fraud operations run by Lawfare ninjas Norm Eisen, Marc Elias, and Mary McCord, with help from Mark Zuckerberg’s $400-million Center for Tech and Civic Life org, prestidigitated millions of extra votes needed to push “Joe Biden” into the winner’s circle.
Those of you who stayed up late the November night in 2020 also probably witnessed some impressive magic tricks in the election returns — for instance, the mom-and-daughter team of Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss pulling a switcheroo in the Fulton County (Atlanta) election HQ, captured on closed-circuit TV, while vote-counting was shut down for several hours due to a “broken toilet”. . . and the wondrous vote flipperooski in Michigan. . . and the panel trucks delivering bales of extra ballots in the wee hours of morning to the main Philadelphia election HQ. . . . and presto-change-o, you got a senile president.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!MSLA!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F774f25ba-2138-42a7-b23d-c3bf3e7fceb1_600x394.heic
This voter fraud business is evidently a global operation, involving elections in many other countries over several election cycles, carried out by a broad network of NGOs and government agencies, such as the now dismantled USAID, which acted as a money-laundering service for all these ops. A good place to start your own research is independent reporter Emerald Robinson’s “X” account.
https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson
Mr. Trump, for one, has always been adamant that the 2020 election was a fraud, but it has taken all year, apparently, to convince White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles that this is so, and now, we’re told, Mr. Trump is about to go after the perps. The hard evidence is there, rumor has it, the receipts, and that is why the Democratic Party is freaking out. . . including that “Seditionist Six” message about refusing orders from the Commander-in-Chief.
The kernel of all this (maybe paranoid, maybe not) is that the DC blob is cornered and that its only hope to escape prosecution, punishment, loss of power and perqs, and possible extinction, is to pull off a coup to bum-rush Mr. Trump out of office by main force. Meaning, our country might be at war with itself right now. Are perp walks in the offing?
" https://truthsocial.com/realDonaldTrump/115647877144374372 "

The election of 2020 was indeed a stolen election and Tina Peters is in jail for
investigating the fact? Where is Trump and MAGA?


"the voter rolls still need to be completely purged and re-vetted with ID sign ups."
« First « Previous Comments 2,199 - 2,237 of 2,237 Search these comments
Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.
I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.
Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/