patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,199,585 comments by 14,172 users - Patrick, porkchopXpress, stereotomy, The_Deplorable online now
Medical Tyranny: CDC Announces All Travelers Must Wear Two Masks, Threatens Arrest
invite response
2021 Jan 31, 7:18pm 1,224 views 67 comments
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
59
GlocknLoad
2021 Feb 4, 2:29pm
GlocknLoad
2021 Feb 4, 2:29pm
Eric Holder says
I am losing faith in humanity. I told my daughter about this just this morning. She said she thinks it's great but "they" should just give them $950. She used to be a conservative. I do not understand how she changed. She is 21 and she has a good job with good career growth. She works hard but wants losers to get $950 for being losers.
One of my clients (she's got to be 80), just today, said the government isn't giving people enough money. "They" need to give people more money.
Anything goes, as long as it's under $950. Even firearms. Somebody made and astute observation that if you steal a firearm costing less than $950 - it's a misdemeanor and a slap on the wrist but if you own a legally bought rifle and it has a (now) wrong type of handle on it - you're a fucking felon and will serve time.
I am losing faith in humanity. I told my daughter about this just this morning. She said she thinks it's great but "they" should just give them $950. She used to be a conservative. I do not understand how she changed. She is 21 and she has a good job with good career growth. She works hard but wants losers to get $950 for being losers.
One of my clients (she's got to be 80), just today, said the government isn't giving people enough money. "They" need to give people more money.
60
Eric Holder
2021 Feb 4, 3:19pm
Eric Holder
2021 Feb 4, 3:19pm
GlocknLoad says
How often shall "they" give $950 to every loser that wants it? Monthly, weekly? Or maybe daily? Hourly? It all makes to fucking sense.
She said she thinks it's great but "they" should just give them $950. She used to be a conservative. I do not understand how she changed. She is 21 and she has a good job with good career growth. She works hard but wants losers to get $950 for being losers.
How often shall "they" give $950 to every loser that wants it? Monthly, weekly? Or maybe daily? Hourly? It all makes to fucking sense.
61
GNL
2021 Feb 5, 5:06am
GNL
2021 Feb 5, 5:06am
Eric Holder says
I'm living in an alien world now. Everything is upside down and almost everyone I know is on board with it, it seems. I'm not hugely religious but the world is in a battle of good vs. evil. It's quite apparent.
GlocknLoad saysShe said she thinks it's great but "they" should just give them $950. She used to be a conservative. I do not understand how she changed. She is 21 and she has a good job with good career growth. She works hard but wants losers to get $950 for being losers.
How often shall "they" give $950 to every loser that wants it? Monthly, weekly? Or maybe daily? Hourly? It all makes to fucking sense.
I'm living in an alien world now. Everything is upside down and almost everyone I know is on board with it, it seems. I'm not hugely religious but the world is in a battle of good vs. evil. It's quite apparent.
62
HeadSet
2021 Feb 5, 7:05am
HeadSet
2021 Feb 5, 7:05am
WineHorror1 says
It is makers vs takers, always has been. Imagine in ancient days a group of folks who formed a farming community. They leaned to work the land and harvest the forest to keep its member reasonable well. Then an outside group sees this, and decides to be good at war, and just kill the farmers and take the produce after the harvest. Then the war folk decide that is a bad idea, since there will be nothing next year, so they decide to enslave the farm folk. Now this evolves into the King-Priest-Slave societies that dominated the world until relatively recently. Under such feudalism, no reason for a serf/slave to improve himself, as if he builds a better house for himself, the house would be taken away by the Lord and the serf will now be expected to build such houses for the rulers, or else.
Why do people seem to want to give up freedom and move to Socialism? Socialism is really no different than the Pharaoh of ancient Egypt, who had all the harvest deposited into his coffers and doled it out according to his "generosity." Today, the takers think they will be on the "in" with the modern day Pharaoh, and will be able to live at societies expense. No thought given to the fact such societies were poor, except for the very high élite.
I'm not hugely religious but the world is in a battle of good vs. evil. It's quite apparent.
It is makers vs takers, always has been. Imagine in ancient days a group of folks who formed a farming community. They leaned to work the land and harvest the forest to keep its member reasonable well. Then an outside group sees this, and decides to be good at war, and just kill the farmers and take the produce after the harvest. Then the war folk decide that is a bad idea, since there will be nothing next year, so they decide to enslave the farm folk. Now this evolves into the King-Priest-Slave societies that dominated the world until relatively recently. Under such feudalism, no reason for a serf/slave to improve himself, as if he builds a better house for himself, the house would be taken away by the Lord and the serf will now be expected to build such houses for the rulers, or else.
Why do people seem to want to give up freedom and move to Socialism? Socialism is really no different than the Pharaoh of ancient Egypt, who had all the harvest deposited into his coffers and doled it out according to his "generosity." Today, the takers think they will be on the "in" with the modern day Pharaoh, and will be able to live at societies expense. No thought given to the fact such societies were poor, except for the very high élite.
64
HeadSet
2021 Feb 5, 7:10pm
HeadSet
2021 Feb 5, 7:10pm
PeopleUnited says
I remember hearing someone say that the turning point will be when the people who work for a living are outnumbered but the people who vote for a living. And having more takers than makers could explain why the national debt goes up every year - just prolonging the inevitable.
So the question is, has America become a majority takers nation?
I remember hearing someone say that the turning point will be when the people who work for a living are outnumbered but the people who vote for a living. And having more takers than makers could explain why the national debt goes up every year - just prolonging the inevitable.
65
PeopleUnited
2021 Feb 5, 7:48pm
PeopleUnited
2021 Feb 5, 7:48pm
Debt is slavery. The debt is proof we are owned.
The civil war did not end slavery, it just gave it new name. Debt, it is how they control the masses, and the ones who won’t play the debt game, they are the freeloaders. Very few are not slaves or freeloaders these days. And the high incarceration rate in USA? That is just more evidence that our slavery is complete, if you step out of line, they lock you up.
The civil war did not end slavery, it just gave it new name. Debt, it is how they control the masses, and the ones who won’t play the debt game, they are the freeloaders. Very few are not slaves or freeloaders these days. And the high incarceration rate in USA? That is just more evidence that our slavery is complete, if you step out of line, they lock you up.
66
Patrick
2021 Feb 5, 9:53pm
Patrick
2021 Feb 5, 9:53pm
HeadSet says
Remember, there are TWO levels of takers:
1. the poor who take from everyone via the government
2. the rich who take from everyone via the government
#2 is a far larger problem, like laws that favor the rich, and especially the very rich. Example: special ultra-low taxation on hedge funds.
WE then pay their taxes for them.
It is makers vs takers, always has been.
Remember, there are TWO levels of takers:
1. the poor who take from everyone via the government
2. the rich who take from everyone via the government
#2 is a far larger problem, like laws that favor the rich, and especially the very rich. Example: special ultra-low taxation on hedge funds.
WE then pay their taxes for them.
« First « Previous Comments 59 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
"
The Center for Disease Control has issued a new coronavirus order requiring DOUBLE masks to be worn for all forms of public transportation in the United States.
Experts Say Those Already Vaccinated Should Still Wear Mask
From CNN:
The CDC announced an order late Friday that will require people to wear a face mask while using any form of public transportation, including buses, trains, taxis, airplanes, boats, subways or ride-share vehicles while traveling into, within and out of the US.
The order goes into effect at 11:59 p.m. Monday.
Masks must be worn while waiting, boarding, traveling and disembarking, it said. The coverings need to be at least two or more layers of breathable fabric secured to the head with ties, ear loops or elastic bands — and scarves and bandanas do not count, the order says.
The CDC said it reserves the right to enforce the order through criminal penalties, but it “strongly encourages and anticipates widespread voluntary compliance” and expects support from other federal agencies to implement the order.
The tyrannical order comes after Joe Biden signed an executive order last week requiring all travelers to wear mask on federal property.
The establishment has been recently pushing double masks despite the ongoing rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines and decline in coronavirus deaths.
White House coronavirus task force leader Dr. Anthony Fauci is now promoting “double masking”, despite saying in March of last year that wearing ANY masks wouldn’t prevent the spread of COVID.
“So, if you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on, it just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective and that’s the reason why you see people either double masking or doing a version of an N95,” Fauci said this week.
“Inside Edition” also lauded Biden, Mitt Romney, and Tom Cruise for double masking recently.
And the New York Times called for Americans to wear a second mask layer earlier this month in an op-ed titled, “One Mask Is Good. Would Two Be Better?“
With “double masking” now being openly pushed, a new slippery slope of mask wearing has been introduced, with some articles beginning to promote TRIPLE masking to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) pushed back against the mask insanity earlier this month, urging Americans, “if you’ve had the disease or you’ve been vaccinated and you’re several weeks out from the second dose, throw your mask away.”
"