« First « Previous Comments 2,171 - 2,209 of 2,209 Search these comments
So, with Bitcoin there is an event horizon where it gets sucked into nothingness.
Fiat in, fiat out, valued in fiat, crypto has no intrinsic value and never will.
It will probably continue to rise in price, until it doesn't. It's dependent on the greater fool.
"technically" should be over $1M value or higher if all these crypto guys are right.
WookieMan says
"technically" should be over $1M value or higher if all these crypto guys are right.
I occasionally buy a lotto ticket when the jackpot is huge. I don't check the ticket immediately pretending I'm a billionaire for a while.
Crypto is like that, but with smaller returns and less electricity used
Bitcoin quantity may not be capped
https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/12/19/blackrock-just-quietly-confirmed-a-devastating-bitcoin-price-bombshell/


Bought my first bitcoin.
I noticed that the prices were going up and I thought I should grab one before they go higher.
Mostly I bought it as a novelty but I'm pretty sure it will be worth more in the long run.
I could have bought one for $20 but ended up paying $35 ($3 over spot price). I believe it will be worth much more in the future. In 1979 it was almost $50 per ounce.
Carful trying to get through TSA with that.
I could have bought one for $20 but ended up paying $35 ($3 over spot price). I believe it will be worth much more in the future. In 1979 it was almost $50 per ounce.
1 ounce silver was around $48 an ounce during the middle of Obama's first term (April 2011 and with all the Quantitative Easing and Zero Interest Rate Policy [ZIRP] ).
It was $36 around December 1979. The 2011 price is its all time high price (non inflation adjusted).
I suspect my one ounce silver bitcoin will eventually be worth more than a digital bitcoin.
So you buy silver as an extreme hedge or insurance for fiat currency (US dollar) ?
Bitcoin price hovers around 100k right now. I predict it will go higher. I would not be surprised if the price doubles or quintuples before its ultimate crash. The greater fools don't know any better.
I could have bought one for $20 but ended up paying $35 ($3 over spot price). I believe it will be worth much more in the future. In 1979 it was almost $50 per ounce.
hedging against fiat currency
When the dollar goes to zero, bitcoin goes to infinity; simple physics.

AD says
hedging against fiat currency
Silver, gold, platinum, guns, ammo and yams; these are all hedges on hyperinflation.
BTC is much more fiat than any of the above. BTC IS fiat!
When the dollar goes to zero, bitcoin goes to infinity; simple physics.
They say you can't eat gold - neither can you eat your bitcoin wallet.
I have no problem understanding a 1oz silver coin. But I never understood Bitcoin. Is it a currency?
How so?
People can trade it for goods and services. However, I have seen exactly the same number of people do so as I have seen people use a 1 oz silver coin for such things. That is zero.
Silver and gold have been money almost since the concept of money started.
They ain't money now. Try buying groceries with it.
Section. 10.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts.” This prohibits states from declaring anything other than gold and silver coins as legal tender (currency that must be accepted to settle debts).Why Non-Gold/Silver Currency is Used:Federal Legal Tender: The federal government, not bound by this restriction, has authority to issue currency under the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) and other implied powers (see below). Congress passed the Legal Tender Acts (1862–1863), making U.S. paper currency (“greenbacks”) legal tender for all debts, public and private, nationwide. States must accept this federal currency because federal law supersedes state law under the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2).
You’re correct that the Constitution doesn’t explicitly grant Congress the power to “coin Money” beyond gold and silver or to issue paper currency. Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 grants Congress the power to “coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin,” which historically referred to minting physical coins. So, how is federal paper/digital currency constitutional, and why isn’t currency reserved to the states?
The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) established that Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause to enact laws supporting its enumerated powers. Creating a national currency facilitates commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and taxation/borrowing (Clauses 1–2).
In the Legal Tender Cases (1870–1884), the Supreme Court upheld the federal government’s authority to issue paper currency as legal tender. In Knox v. Lee (1871) and Juilliard v. Greenman (1884), the Court ruled that paper money was a “necessary and proper” means to fund the government, regulate commerce, and ensure economic stability, even though not explicitly listed in Article I, Section 8.
« First « Previous Comments 2,171 - 2,209 of 2,209 Search these comments
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/24/17275202/bitcoin-scam-cryptocurrency-mining-pump-dump-fraud-ico-value