Comments 1 - 40 of 54 Next » Last » Search these comments
To all those who think british gave civilization and technology to the world.
Defecating in the openThey forgot to colorize San Francisco and LA dark brown 160-200
indc saysLooks like no one wants to refute the points made in video
What? Watch Bahrat nationalist propaganda so Indians can deal with their insecurities vis a vis with the rest of the world? It's like watching videos of "How Canada is not like the US". Those are made for the same reasons -- made to deal with the insecurities of Canadians so overwhelmed by America's cultural and economic presence right next door.
Like when they got all 'proud' for sending that probe to the Moon despite the fact that they are just doing stuff the West did 60 years ago, which the West had to INVENT -- not copy -- how to do? Oh puleeze.
Learn how to use toilets. Then get back to us, ok?
.
indc saysIts funny when american nationalists complain about other countries nationalists.
I am not complaining nor can anything I've said here be construed as such. How can I complain about that which I am making fun of and enjoying it? In this case, exposing your 'shit' (literally) for what it is.
See, when you are caught out with the truth..you simply LIE, don't you? In this case, you are attacking the messenger with smears.
indc saysWe have a saying people who talk about gutter(sewer) all the time is what they have in their brain
To avoid dealing with the shitty reality you are in, no doubt.
Again: Learn how to use toilets, then get back to us, ok?
And women BLEACH THEIR SKIN in order to be 'whiter'.
indc saysWhich statement did I lie in all this discussion.
I already told you. Learn English.
OccasionalCortex says
In this case, you are attacking the messenger with smears.
FYI, this is not for the OP but for others ...
The region of British India and the former Imperial Russia/Soviet Union is divided by a thin line across a mountain crescent circa modern era Tajikistan. Now, here's a sample of how their ppl look (in modern times) ...
Holy cow! There are white ppl, on the border, opposite British India? How could this be? I thought that the notion of 'white' was only from the British Empire?
Wait a minute, so whitey boys and girls were around, perhaps before the British arrived and finally, when the border crossing was locked down by the two Empires (British vs Russian) at odds with each other, that one side stayed 'white' majority and the other, a mix of white and non-white, after two centuries?
Dont take input from 1 guy.
Again get into your thick brain none of the actresses in india want to look russian or western. Maybe talk to more enlighten indians.
Like I said before there is enough research done till now showing there is no difference between north and south indians. That is a myth propagated by British to divide indians. Skin tones are different because of different environments people live in. If you bother see the map of india tropic of cancer passes through middle of india.
Rin saysPerhaps racism exists everywhere and different societies deal with it differently and that Malays, on the whole, once you factor out Islam vs { Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity }, aren't so racist after all?
Hell, they even have CASTES -- which still are a social-economic-political factor despite all the Virtue Signalling Indians say otherwise on the subject. And women BLEACH THEIR SKIN in order to be 'whiter'.
indc saysDont take input from 1 guy.
Actually, add him and ten other Tamils/Keralans from Kuala Lumpur and Singapore to the list.
indc saysAgain get into your thick brain none of the actresses in india want to look russian or western. Maybe talk to more enlighten indians.
Like I said before there is enough research done till now showing there is no difference between north and south indians. That is a myth propagated by British to divide indians. Skin tones are different because of different environments people live in. If you bother see the map of india tropic of cancer passes through middle of india.
Considering that all of the other South Indians I know, see themselves as separate from the North, doesn't exactly give me the warm and fuzzies. If it's not race, is it a nationality thing wh...
But chemistry and astronomy? Indians were first to prove Sun was at the center of solar system.
zinc was refined only in India until 15th century: https://www.rheinzink.com/en/quality/the-history-of-zinc/
Also, did the British create the current separatist/terrorist problems in Kashmir/Jammu and Assam/Manipur? Or was it Indira Gandhi's govt?
I've heard from Assamese and others, that the whole region was in peace, before Indira Gandhi screwed it up? And Assam is basically, split between India and Myanmar, not really a part of either.
Yes your point of Nehru/Indira gandhi is true. I will give you points for knowing about them. Wrong governance policy does not mean ordinary people discriminate against each other.
North-east indians face racism in other parts of india. They look mongoloid(chinese) and ordinary indians are vary about chinese.
North-east indians face racism in other parts of india. They look mongoloid(chinese) and ordinary indians are vary about chinese.
That is what happens when people come into power based on family instead of policy acumen.
indc says
Ok, here's the thing. These 'diasporic' South Indians have a new homeland in Malaysia, with work visas in Singapore, and in Malaysia, they're equals with the locals whereas in Singapore, they deal with bigotry from the Chinese majority which is kinda expected.
As a result of being happy in Malaysia, they have no interest in returning to India because their parents' memories of the Nehru/Indira era is at the fore front of their minds and don't see a future there outside of the usual Bangalore Inc/Silicon Valley thing.
So the question is this ... did the British cre...
Holy cow! There are white ppl, on the border, opposite British India? How could this be? I thought that the notion of 'white' was only from the British Empire?
British have been teaching people in south that they are different from north for 100+ years. And these differences still drive people today.
When the British arrived, the south and the north of the sub-continent had different countries. The people living on the sub-continent obviously saw themselves as different from each other.
If you think Indira Ghandi was corrupt for causing conflict
indc saysBritish have been teaching people in south that they are different from north for 100+ years. And these differences still drive people today.
When the British arrived, the south and the north of the sub-continent had different countries. The people living on the sub-continent obviously saw themselves as different from each other. It's a good thing the British did not try to wipe out that regional difference like Chinese and Russians did in their respective imperial expansion. Britain itself is better off to have retained the identity to leave EU, and the Scots to have retained the identity to secede from the UK. Regional self-government makes for more responsive government than imperial rule. If you think Indira Ghandi was corrupt for causing conflict to win votes, what do you think of Modi bombing Pakistan on the eve of the most recent election to win votes?
Reality saysWhen the British arrived, the south and the north of the sub-continent had different countries. The people living on the sub-continent obviously saw themselves as different from each other.
This is what I'm trying to discern, listening to members of various South Asian diasporas vis a vis ...
Reality saysIf you think Indira Ghandi was corrupt for causing conflict
a corrupt matriarchy and her numerous screwups?
Sure, I'm certain that ppl in modern times are trying to make a difference and mend fences but I can't buy into this idea that India was originally united, in terms of both race & culture, and it was only the British who did the dastardly deeds when it's clear that both Bahrain and Malaysia are better off, in terms of tolerance & general cohesiveness, over their re...
Do you have any proof that south and north were 2 different countries or kingdoms? I just posted India's 1760 map on other thread did you even bother to check it? why is that important because that is when british started to visit india and start foothold in bengal.
What do you mean indira gandhi caused conflict. Are you a pakistani talking about 1971 war?
Pakistan is a breeding ground for terrorists. They sent out a terrorist and killed 44 soldiers with a car bomb.. Modi decided to retaliate and kill terrorists in their training camps so that they will not dare to attack again.
USA kills terrorists half way around the world. India should not defends its own borders.
Dont worry Modi will find a solution for Kashmir by clearing pakis out of gilgit baltistan.
You want proof that India is same race and culture: You ask me about it.
There are 12 rivers in India from north to south. Every year 1 river is celebrated in 12 year cycle. If the cultures are different why would one region respect others?
There was a religious reformer atleast in 500 BC. He setup religious places of knowledge in 4 corners of present day India. And other smaller religious places called peeta in 26 places some of them are in present day pakistan and bangladesh.
indc saysDo you have any proof that south and north were 2 different countries or kingdoms? I just posted India's 1760 map on other thread did you even bother to check it? why is that important because that is when british started to visit india and start foothold in bengal.
I'm not the least bit interested in any map provided by "epic"-worshiping nationalistic liars like you. There are plenty reliable historical maps of the sub-continent on the internet. Maps of all countries change over time. The British East India Company was formed on December 31st, 1600. There were far more than two countries on the Indian sub-continent in 1601 and in 1760.
What do you mean indira gandhi caused conflict. Are you a pakistani talking about 1971 war?
No. I was talking about the conflict that you said she caused within India itself. And no, I'm not from th...
indc saysYou want proof that India is same race and culture: You ask me about it.
There are 12 rivers in India from north to south. Every year 1 river is celebrated in 12 year cycle. If the cultures are different why would one region respect others?
There was a religious reformer atleast in 500 BC. He setup religious places of knowledge in 4 corners of present day India. And other smaller religious places called peeta in 26 places some of them are in present day pakistan and bangladesh.
Such revanchism is proof that most of the world's brown countries, even their alleged intellectuals, are living in the pre-1648Westphalian world (i.e. intellectually pre-modern, literally atavistic). Obviously, the manufactured claim you are copying is essentially laying territorial claims to all of Pakistan and Bangladesh (either that, or the prophets thousands of years ago already foresaw precisely the ...
So you are another of those "shit brained" liberals who dont have any logic. Did you hold placards outside white house asking US govt not to kill osama?
Liberals in India are worst They held placards and asked govt to not to kill terrorists arrested in India.
India is no ones bitch anymore.
Around 900AD ghazwa-e-hind was declared and india was attacked troops 4 different kingdom came together and beat the troops so bad that caliphate disintegrated.
Which is not taught in any history book, not even in India.
Another comment with no logic or pure lies. What do you mean recent invention.
The celebrations were happening atleast for 5000 yrs with recorded history. Celtics can claim if they were still doing that even today. They ran away because of other tribes. Indians did it even under muslim and british rule.
pakistan, bangladesh were carved out of "british india".
Nepal and tibet had treaties with british India.
After british left India did not occupy nepal. But China occupied tibet.
Its high time that people outside India stop tell it how to behave.
No one calls tiammen square massacre conflict it is pure oppression of ones citizens.
Is europe considered 1 race? They are all caucasoids I think.
No one will say all of India is one race.
indc saysSo you are another of those "shit brained" liberals who dont have any logic. Did you hold placards outside white house asking US govt not to kill osama?
Liberals in India are worst They held placards and asked govt to not to kill terrorists arrested in India.
Osama who? Why would someone who died in a cave of likely kidney failure in 2001-2002 matter at all a decade later?
India is no ones bitch anymore.
Around 900AD ghazwa-e-hind was declared and india was attacked troops 4 different kingdom came together and beat the troops so bad that caliphate disintegrated.
Which is not taught in any history book, not even in India.
hmm, India was no one's bitch anymore because of some story from 900AD? Have you heard of the British India Company founded in 1600 and the British Raj after that? I suppose it is easy to fool the average IQ=...
Jesus. 44 comments on India as a topic. Did wet bulb get mentioned? How about Guam? Either way, I'm sure it's all Trump's fault.
Comments 1 - 40 of 54 Next » Last » Search these comments
www.youtube.com/embed/sbd4qiPLWOQ