« First « Previous Comments 41 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
That statement is so vaguely written as to be a deliberate Rorschach blot - "obstruction" is more a reflection of the bias of the one reading it than anything specific. The true statement would stop with "No evidence of criminal obstruction." It did not need the "but there might have been" inference.
Everything with Trump put aside. I cannot believe this was blown up as much as it has with the bullshit Russia attempting to influence our election. This crap has been going on between all would powers forever in one shape or another, probable the US is the largest perpetrators of such acts, the outrage is so rediculously overblown. Aipac probably has 100x more influence on our elections. Let's look all the foreign lobbies.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 45 of 45 Search these comments
Did you see Rod Rosenstein smirk on that one, even he thought that was a hoot.