patrick.net

How is it fair to Roy Moore to not vote for him simply because of the existence of accusations that cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, or even to the point of probable cause

————

If thats not enough, then go with what we know with absolute certainty. That he was twice removed as judge for his ISIS like hatred of the Constitution, and disregard for the Rule of Law


shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.

Shall also not erect a 5,000 statue of the Koran at
The State Judicial Building.

Flaunting ones ignorance and ambivalence towards America and our Constitution is not a virtue....unless youre a Trumpcuck or Alabama Righttard voter

anon_2ddb7 says

Her first date with Roy was at a place called catfish cabin.

This allegedly happened so long ago, that the accuser that was a teenager at the time, can join AARP next year. Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary evidence.

I don't go by accusations, because then all you got to do is find a few activists or those who come when you "Drag Dollar Bills through a trailer park". Accusations != Evidence.

"I flew a blue rocket to the moon last night, dad!"

If she's so sure, let's get ready for the civil suit. I'd be shocked if she or anybody else files one, because it's a put up job. Seeing Gloria Aldred is a red flag for me.

There were 5 Bazillion Trump accusers, most of them wealthy activists involved with the Democrats, in Oct-Nov, and they've all disappeared.

BTW, now that Roy Moore is completely vindicated by the latest forgery revelations, how pissed is Al Franken right now? He just resigned yesterday so that Democrats could have the high ground and maybe win the Alabama seat. Now that has all failed. He probably won't actually resign and will run again in 2020 is my guess. Did Trump plan all this? Was the woman a plant. This is some serious 12D chess if so my friends!

errc says

If thats not enough, then go with what we know with absolute certainty. That he was twice removed as judge for his ISIS like hatred of the Constitution, and disregard for the Rule of Law


shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.

Shall also not erect a 5,000 statue of the Koran at
The State Judicial Building.

Flaunting ones ignorance and ambivalence towards America and our Constitution is not a virtue....unless youre a Trumpcuck or Alabama Righttard voter

I love your comment. At least you are now being honest about why you don't like him. I also agree with you that we shouldn't be putting bible passages in federal buildings. Does the fact that Roy Moore wanted to do this make him ineligible to run for elected office? I don't think so. So now I have to actually compare issues and decide who I'm going to vote for? That's too confusing, lets just call one a pedo and vote for the other one instead!

anon_4e80d says

Of course none of this will matter to you because its patnet, I'll just point out your hypocrisy instead. If voting for Roy Moore is immoral, why was it moral to vote for Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton had much more credible rape accusations against him then Roy Moore does, and the Democrats still elected him.

I haven't said that I know that Roy Moore a rapist. I did say that his accusers are credible, and I think there's a good chance he did commit statutory rape of a 14 yr old. Here's what I think about Clinton: There were credible allegations against Clinton, and Dems elected him anyway. Perhaps people didn't believe the charges. Perhaps they thought that it wasn't worth worrying over. In hindsight, I'm sure that many wish that they had not voted for him. I for one was happy that he was impeached, b/c he lied under oath.

One thing that people don't seem to discuss, though, is the impact of time. Society in general is not standing for things that were routinely done 25 years ago (when Bill Clinton was elected). Clarence Thomas would not have been approved if he were appointed last year. Franken would not have resigned 25 yrs ago. I actually think that the Dems are overreacting on the punishment of Franken. But, the Democrats are saying enough is enough. Republicans are acting like Democrats did 25 yrs ago, even though 25 yrs ago they were arguing that Clinton should not be elected for similar accusations. So, the Democrats have evolved to be less tolerant of rape and harassment. Republicans are showing that they are either just 100% partisan or that they are evolving to be more tolerant of rape and harassment. It's pretty funny to me.

Well how about that! She forged added some information with the obvious intent of making it appear it was Moore's.

Will the Witchfinder Generals now admit there is much less to go on? Or will they continue to demand the wood be oiled and set alight, regardless of evidence?

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

anon_4e80d says

Of course none of this will matter to you because its patnet, I'll just point out your hypocrisy instead. If voting for Roy Moore is immoral, why was it moral to vote for Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton had much more credible rape accusations against him then Roy Moore does, and the Democrats still elected him.

I haven't said that I know that Roy Moore a rapist. I did say that his accusers are credible, and I think there's a good chance he did commit statutory rape of a 14 yr old. Here's what I think about Clinton: There were credible allegations against Clinton, and Dems elected him anyway. Perhaps people didn't believe the charges. Perhaps they thought that it wasn't worth worrying over. In hindsight, I'm sure that many wish that they had not voted for him. I for one was happy that he was impeached, b/c he lied under oath.

One thing that people don't seem to disc...

Maybe the dems would have some credibility on this if they weren’t defending Bill up until last year when Hillary lost.