« First « Previous Comments 87 - 106 of 106 Search these comments
To OP ... seems very clear what the majority of the population is asking for:
http://news.gallup.com/poll/220637/americans-widely-support-tighter-regulations-gun-sales.aspx
It's pretty simple zzyyxx:
Dems want to close the loopholes by which such shooters can very easily obtain guns.
So tell us, Joey the TROLL, where did this guy buy his evil "assault weapon"?
Looks like that destroys your "loophole" narrative, doesn't it?
With what, MORE gun laws?
You do know that criminals don't give a shit about CURRENT laws right? That's why we need MORE laws? Did I get that right?
Hey Joey the TROLL, got an answer yet to the questions?
Dems want to close the loopholes by which such shooters can very easily obtain guns.
I asked for SPECIFIC laws that would have prevented him from buying, NOT your trolling narrative.
What specific NEW law would have stopped him?
Your honor, I rest my case.
What NEW laws is your Tribe proposing that would have prevented this guy from buying his guns. This should be a real easy answer for you, if you were really serious, and not just a TROLL.
Ahhh, so that would have prevent this guy from buying the guns, if they checked him out before he bought them at a local gun show. Good!
I would love to save lives, I just keep asking you for sensible laws that would WORK in these cases but not infringe on lawful owners, but all you keep posting is nonsense that has no bearing on reality.
« First « Previous Comments 87 - 106 of 106 Search these comments
And what would you be willing to trade for it?
I have a proposal, but I'll hold on to it for now.
UPDATE: Please refrain from virtue signalling in this thread - we have plenty of that in other threads related to LV shooting already.