patrick.net

curious2 says

mell says

And why can't somebody be unmarried and active in church?

He can be, of course, many are.

Doesn't surprise me, only very few people are born to have no relationships except for the one with their creator :)

Create a law that overrides the word' marriage 'with ' union'.
All perks can vo to unions.
Problem solved.
No disenfranchisement of anybody

I should have guessed that jackass is actually crab in disguise:

http://patrick.net/whoelse.php?user_ID=73164

I didn't check until I saw two "Likes" above the most disgustingly uncivil comment on the thread. That made me suspect someone was using two accounts. Crab/jackass, it's bad enough you're a bigoted troll, but don't ascribe your bigotry to dead people who are no longer around to speak for themselves.

What disguise? You click on a users name and see their aliases. Are you so obtuse as to consider that a disguise?
curious2 said: I should have guessed that jackass is actually crab in disguise:http://patrick.net/whoelse.php?user_ID=73164

Your example does not hold water.
Nobody is excluded from unions or marriage.
Your soldier scenario excludes females.
Any gay person can get married. Straights can marry.

sbh said: Ed, your historical franchise depends on being able to exclude others from what you think of as yours. So it is exactly as if American soldiers might claim their service to our nation is disenfranchised if women are allowed to serve

FYI, the jackass crab troll has reinstated the disguise so that clicking on Aliases no longer reveals Jackass Crab in its full trollishness. No point debating further with a worthless troll sitting alone on a Saturday night in Texas, waiting for the next Rick Perry campaign; DFTT applies.

reinstated the disguise?? WTF?? Does MrEd run this website?
Tell us all how MrEd would go about circumventing patricks code to do what you describe? We need a laugh...
me thinks you're freaking out.
probably due to MrEd putting forth a winning argument for which you have no answers...

curious2 says

FYI, the jackass crab troll has reinstated the disguise so that clicking on Aliases no longer reveals Jackass Crab in its full trollishness. No point debating further with a worthless troll sitting alone on a Saturday night in Texas, waiting for the next Rick Perry campaign; DFTT applies.

curious2 says

FYI, the jackass crab troll has reinstated the disguise so that clicking on Aliases no longer reveals Jackass Crab in its full trollishness. No point debating further with a worthless troll sitting alone on a Saturday night in Texas, waiting for the next Rick Perry campaign; DFTT applies.

Not sure WTH your talking about below, but after reading this thread it's apparent you have a 'thing' against the traditional definition of marriage.
Why do you hate married people??

curious2 says

I should have guessed that jackass is actually crab in disguise:

http://patrick.net/whoelse.php?user_ID=73164

I didn't check until I saw two "Likes" above the most disgustingly uncivil comment on the thread. That made me suspect someone was using two accounts. Crab/jackass, it's bad enough you're a bigoted troll, but don't ascribe your bigotry to dead people who are no longer around to speak for themselves.