« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
As an anorexo-dyslexic mother of 7 autistic children, a third of whom are gluten-intolerant, and half of whom have peanut allergies, I am concerned about gluten in vaccines, and how magnetic fields from power lines are affecting my childrens' ADHD and dyslexia: Should I take them off carbs entirely?
Sounds like a pleading for a class action lawsuit. "And somebody needs to pay! It's all THEIR fault."
One thing, though: If you hear the word "Morgellons", run and don't look back! There are real cases of most of the conditions I mocked above, but Morgellons is a whole nother zone of delusion.
Yeah, I had to google that one. Must be akin to cutting taken to a paranoid extreme.
You gotta admit, it sure sounds spooky.
"Beware, the Morgellon is lean and athirst! Ia! Cthulu Fatghn!"
How many people have allergies to meat?
Nobody. Yet, there are many allergic to some of the most common plant-based ingredients: Soy, Wheat, Peanuts, etc.
How many people have allergies to meat?
Nobody. Yet, there are many allergic to some of the most common plant-based ingredients: Soy, Wheat, Peanuts, etc.
I'm going to go ahead (as a Scientist) and point out that meat is basically yourself.
People are allergic to fish. And in some cases other's saliva. But cooked meat is pretty rudimentary in terms of allergens.
Now plants on the other hand (peanuts, wheat, etc.) cause severe allergies in people (pollen, i.e. hay fever), has a broad base for whom is affected, and these allergies can develop and dissapear over the course of a lifetime.
Anyways. I am in support of the belief that Celiacs disease is real, but extremely rare (mostly jews). And gluten really doesn't affect people, as it's really just a bunch of sulfur in peoples stomach, and that might cause undesired effects. Like if you ate a bunch of eggs.
In the end, if you do have a hurt belly after eating a bunch of wheat. Step back from the table fatty.
Didn't read the article. I tried a gluten free diet after talking with a friend about her experience. I was skeptical, but intrigued enough to give it a fair shot (6 weeks, strict gluten avoidance). I feel tremendously better, and the few times I have reintroduced gluten into my diet, I have started to feel bad again. Not rigorously scientific...at all. But I feel better and it's not too hard to do...If it is purely psychological, I'm ok with that and will keep doing it. If it's some other unintentional change in the diet, I may try to track that down so I can start eating gluten again...don't have the time to do that right now.
The two main things that are better for me:
1. Way more energy, even on less sleep. I had developed a problem waking up and had low energy throughout the morning into afternoon. Even on 9+ hours of sleep. Not a problem anymore.
2. Gastrointestinal issues. I had gotten used to this and thought it was normal. Much much better now.
For the GI issues I have also found that I am allergic / sensitive to citrus, and avoid that now too.
After restricting gluten with my daughter we have noticed a significant improvement in her energy level (particularly in the morning) as well as mood / emotional state. I suppose it could be psychological, but on at least one occasion we noticed her regressing and subsequently determined that we were eating bread that wasn't GF. After removing this from her diet , things got better again.
I am definitely interested in determining / understanding the truth of what is going on, but not if it interferes too much with the success we have found going GF. It sure seems to work, so I plan on continuing it. I'm sure I will "test" it from time to time and maybe try to get to the root of it...some day.
Swebb, the energy differential likely occurred from cutting the carbohydrate intake way down, relative to pre GF diet. For the fools that rely on carbs for energy, its a perpetual diabetic-type blood sugar spike followed by crash. Once you can garner energy from fat stores instead of carbs, the spike/crash is nullified and your energy access becomes much more constant.
If you enjoy reading, and want to expand your scientific knowledge on nutrition, start with
Nutrition and physical degeneration by weston a price
Good calories bad calories by gary taubes
Or if you're short on time you can get a solid understanding of nutritional mechanics and how we got here (confusion of weight loss/gain relative to calories in, calories out), try
Why we get fat and what to do about it by gary taubes
Then you won't have to sound like a misinformed person, still claiming flat earth nonsense like "eat everything in balance, and exercise more"
Back in the 70s when the dominant fad diet - "Low Fat" - was pushed - obesity was found in less than 12% of the population.
Today it's more than a third. The main calorie sources for Americans is sugary drinks (esp. "Low Fat" Coffee Drinks - apparently if you drink calories, they don't count) and corn-based snacks.
This emerged as Low Fat became dominant.
Adult Onset Diabetes used to be rare as rain in Spain, when Americans consumed more meat and vegetables and less corn-based products, also. Children almost never got it. It's why they had to rename it to "Type Two" diabetes.
Swebb says, "Didn't read the article. "
If he/she can't find the time to read a few pages of article, they won't be reading four books on nutrition. The rest was pure anecdote, and the exact stuff such fad diets use to "prove their worth" to people who only have time for word-of-mouth promotion and will never read a scientific article in their lives.
If he/she can't find the time to read a few pages of article, they won't be reading four books on nutrition. The rest was pure anecdote, and the exact stuff such fad diets use to "prove their worth" to people who only have time for word-of-mouth promotion and will never read a scientific article in their lives.
In the mean time I did get a chance to read the article linked to, which I found to be a bit smug and not entirely convincing, but it did catch my attention. While I don't have time to read more deeply on the subject right now, I'm open to learning / understanding it better. I thought I was pretty clear about this.
I was sharing an anecdote, but I was totally transparent about that fact. I acknowledged that the real cause/effect could be something other than gluten - but given my personal experience with GF and my limited time to dig deeper, I'm going to stick with what is working for me for the time being. What's wrong with that? I'm not promoting it or pushing it on anyone.
I actually did note the books that were mentioned, and may well read them in due time. And for what it's worth I have read (and authored) many scientific articles, so you missed the mark with your snarky comment.
@swebb
Sorry if I offended. I still think what I said is generally true, even if it doesn't apply specifically to you. You were indeed transparent about the nature of what you posted. I should know better: the average patnet poster is very educated and intelligent. Hope there's no hard feelings. I do indeed tend towards snark. It may be my default setting ;)
Snarky may or may not be your default setting. Nutrition is the most emotionally charged subject people are able to engage in conversation about.
Rightfully so. People don't often enjoy challenging their own belief system. and here we are in the year 2014, and the majority of our species doesn't understand how to scientifically fuel their most precious of all machinery. We're dumping unleaded gas into our diesel tank, and wearing our best "you're shitting me" face, when our faith in healthful Jesus is leaving us all sick.
What about unta gleeben gluten globen
(singing)
She's got Celiac, Celiac for sure!
And she's dieting like she's never dieted before...
-----------------------------------------------------
Def Sembello, my favorite singers.
I won't join a fad diet unless it has a "cleanse" in it
Well, this is the one for you! Apparently your colon is causing you to be toxic. Because, according to some dude:
“When you use CFL daily, you help prevent the toxins that enter the body every day from becoming embedded in the soft tissue and cells. Plus you benefit from the powerful ingredients that are building blocks for good health and vitality.â€
http://www.isagenix.com/en-US/products/categories/individual-items/cleanse-for-life
5,000 years of eating bread and we got provably shorter, with worse bones, teeth and overall health.
So the same researcher who "discovered" gluten sensitivity for non-celiac patients has debunked his own work with nothing less than a rigorous application of science. His conclusion: perceived sensitivity to gluten is triggered by other factors including psychological cause. Approximately 1% of adults have a gluten allergy, known as celiac disease. So what's this say about the 18% of people who currently eat a gluten-free diet? Here's the article:
http://www.businessinsider.com/gluten-sensitivity-and-study-replication-2014-5
Until the Industrial revolution the average lifespan was mid 30's. You only made it past 50 if you were a well taken care of leader or from the ruling class.
Gluten is not bad for you unless you are in the 1% who have celiac disease. Same goes for most other foods, if you are not allergic against them, they are mostly good for you in moderation.
Until the Industrial revolution the average lifespan was mid 30's. You only made it past 50 if you were a well taken care of leader or from the ruling class.
mell says
Gluten is not bad for you unless you are in the 1% who have celiac disease. Same goes for most other foods, if you are not allergic against them, they are mostly good for you in moderation.
That's very bad advise in an unqualified statement like this. What you mean to say is natural gluten is not harmful. But most wheat is GMO, not natural. It is the GMO wheat that causes the sensitivity, and can cause a reaction even to healthy gluten.
Gluten is not bad for you unless you are in the 1% who have celiac disease. Same goes for most other foods, if you are not allergic against them, they are mostly good for you in moderation.
mell says
Gluten is not bad for you unless you are in the 1% who have celiac disease. Same goes for most other foods, if you are not allergic against them, they are mostly good for you in moderation.
I beg to differ - while most people don't have Celiac disease, they do have allergies, autoimmune issues, and low-level chronic inflammation. Most of these are caused by foreign proteins and pathogens leaking from the gut into the body and bloodstream. Gluten causes leaky guts. Eliminate gluten -> eliminate leaky gut -> eliminate many of the previously mentioned conditions.
I now believe it’s the Roundup in our food that gives us leaky gut, which allows proteins like gluten to enter our bloodstreams and cause us allergic reactions. It also correlates strongly with autism.
for the rest though it's even beneficial as it acts as a prebiotic.
I assume I’m the one sharing the bad advice. I’m healthy weight, 47, and on no prescriptions. I see a doctor lately for an at work injury.
Misc says
There is no GMO wheat that is commercially available.
So why the fuck is Monsanto suing farmers? I guess they patented God's wheat? This is the most mis-informed health statement I've ever read on patnet.
I will buy a blood pressure monitor and see if I actually need the lisinopril; a few or my blood pressure readings were only 104 systolic, kinda low.
Maybe drinking 4 cups of coffee before my appointment affected my blood pressure?
but there's also a genetic component of course.
I'll be off 3. meloxicam when I get my hip fixed and no more arthritis.
« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 63 Next » Last » Search these comments
So the same researcher who "discovered" gluten sensitivity for non-celiac patients has debunked his own work with nothing less than a rigorous application of science. His conclusion: perceived sensitivity to gluten is triggered by other factors including psychological cause. Approximately 1% of adults have a gluten allergy, known as celiac disease. So what's this say about the 18% of people who currently eat a gluten-free diet? Here's the article:
http://www.businessinsider.com/gluten-sensitivity-and-study-replication-2014-5