patrick.net

I'll take real estate advice from a realtor when I take diet advice from Willy Wonka.

PockyClipsNow says

The RE bears are now inventing fiction since no facts support future price drops.

As much as sales data may mean something to a buyer, those aren't the facts. It's the principle of the greater fool, and we just saw that in 2006, and 2007.

I don't really know what perma bear means, but I do know there has been a long term strategy of Real Estate market timing. You buy when people are selling, and sell when people are buying.

That market timing has, in the past, been based on a decade long cycle such as between 1976, 1986, 1996, and 2006. Those were good times to buy except that 2006 thing.

Between 1998, and 2003 the Real Estate market changed radically, and globally. It wasn't just here in the good old USofA, it was Europe, Asia, and Africa. After the crash in 2008 South America then took off as the emerging Real Estate markets.

While people here blame our government for the change in Real Estate it doesn't explain what happened in the other markets until you look at banking.

Real Estate is always a good investment. Owning rentals is a good investment, but the strategy has changed. The Housing Industry has changed.

The economy has changed.

Banks are in control of large blocks of property. They are selling today for a premium, have cleared the books of dead wood, and they may well be done. I think banks will pull out of Real Estate next year 2014, from what Bernanke has said about the Fed.

Some properties will always be good, some other will adjust according to what the market will bear.

Because of that volitility I would rather have my money elsewhere right now.

So, I don't know if that is a perma bear position, because I own property. I just also know that we will sell another place this year rather than rent it out, but keep the commercial property, and land.

While I was writing this the Dow broke through the 2007 record high. How about that Dow? In terms of short terms gain, what about those that bought in 2008? or even last year?

I understand about the leverage, but still something has changed in terms of investment.

PockyClipsNow says

Water wars sounds like a great movie!

The RE bears are now inventing fiction since no facts support future price drops.

I waited too long to buy back in. Was lucky to buy last year. When i sell my house for 1.2m i will be sure to logon here with the news. Then retire to AZ where i can carry a gun everywhere like the old west.

Sounds like a plan. Fortunately or unfortunately, I cannot find any house selling 1.2 M in the future at where I live. May need to find some other ways to get some money to retire in AZ.

David Losh says

As much as sales data may mean something to a buyer, those aren't the facts.
It's the principle of the greater fool, and we just saw that in 2006, and
2007.

Like it or not, this IS the game nowadays. You can choose not to play the game but it does not necassarily mean people will all lose shirts by playing it.

Mobi says

this IS the game nowadays

That's exactly what I said, but sales data isn't the game. Real Estate is a long term hold.

robertoaribas says

6 million people who bought in 2006 can tell you that,

It depends on the deal, doesn't it?

Just because a house sold for $300K doesn't make it worth that, it may well be worth only $80K. Then to tell me a person will rent that $80K investment for $1100, doesn't sound like a good thing either.

In your own scenarios you make it attractive to buy rather than rent, so that is also a contradiction. Why would some one pay you $1100 going forward?

It depends on the deal. You are talking blanket mathmatical formulas, that don't seem like sound advice.

Actually we will see soon enough, because like you, I'm usually right.

Anyone who is still a RE bear and thinks prices are about to crash huge are not capable of rational thought. They literally are refuting math with a math teacher! Really amazing to watch people deny reality. Its magical thinking.

We all wanted cheap housing for all but thats not allowed by the feds.

robertoaribas says

a year?

You must be kidding. A year, in Real estate is nothing, as we saw in 2006.

I don't dispute your rents today, because it is a tight rental market. What I also know is that three of my former clients two with short sales, and one a foreclosure are now eligible for mortgages.

How's that possible?

My objection was when you took your mathmatical formula from Phoenix Arizona, and wanted to say Chino California was the same. It's not the same demographic, or economy, so that didn't play for me.

You might as well be saying the price of Real Estate never goes down, but we know that isn't true, don't we?

We also know that banks are still tight on credit, but if the price of property were to drop, and the amount of interest income were to rise a little bit they would be back at it.

In the mean time the economy has catered to the rental markets, and over all I don't see housing being a tight commoditiy in the future.

I've been doing this a long time, and timed several Real Estate markets. This time is different.

You are in Phoenix Arizona, and have done a great job there, but continue to make blanket statements based on your own experience which doesn't need to translate universally.

robertoaribas says

are you claiming my renters don't exist?

There is some suggestion a few might disappear when they qualify for a mortgage. I don't know numbers but I'm having an experience similar to Losh where I suddenly know a list of people who have short-sold homes and are now waiting for their credit to recover so they can buy again. If you're making a premium off them for a year or two, though, you're making money. It doesn't sound like you're concerned that you spend a lot of time making that money, so sounds like Roberto's cleaning up right now.(literally and figuratively)

PockyClipsNow says

thats not allowed by the feds.

The Fed is what is driving this market, but they have a limit. Bernanke has said so on many occasions.

I don't understand this fascination with another crash. That isn't what happens. It's a slide backwards.

Housing is a part of the over all economy that isn't growing without cheap credit, and speculation.

We saw a slide in the 1970s, and 1980s, especially the 1980s when interest rates spiked. Even in the early to mid 1990s there were some awesome deals in Real Estate, globally even.

So tell me what's going to continue to prop up this pricing?

Zirp and 2% mortages will prop it up. Ez lending. 5 year foreclosure timelines, workouts, loan mods - money doesnt exist its zeros and ones so there is no limit or end in sight to the manipulations.

robertoaribas says

I sold several investment homes

I sold in 2005, 2006, and 2007.

robertoaribas says

the math works the same unless for some reason paying 1500 in rent versus 1000 on mortgage feels better in Chico...

No, the math only works in a rising market. Rising rents, or property values. Buying for the sake of saving on rent isn't sound business, unless that is the place you will stay the rest of your life, but Chico? California? Come on.

robertoaribas says

I predicted the crash.

We all predicted the crash.

robertoaribas says

I expect a much better economy in the 2014

You're forgetting the debt from those wars, and ignoring banking as a driver of the Real Estate markets.

PockyClipsNow says

Zirp and 2% mortages will prop it up. Ez lending

There will be easy lending on property values that are in line with what the market will bear with higher interest rates.

Like I've said we have been here before. The economy has shifted. Housing will become less of a driver in the economy, kind of like we are seeing now. We have a recovery in spite of the Housing sector.

Rising prices aren't always a good thing, in today's case it's choking the consumer with higher debt that will need to be paid off over a longer, and longer period.

In the past inflation ate the mortage debt up, you could sell for a profit. When you pay a high price today, and prices fall your ability to move is greatly reduced.

It isn't a matter of if prices will recede, it's when. I think it will be in 2014 which will be the end of a seven year cycle started in 2007.

robertoaribas says

you were completely wrong

I'm very rarely wrong.

I highly doubt we will ever see high intrest rates again. Why why why would the fed ever raise them? It would cause catastrophy thus not allowed. Inflation has been beat by chindia plus automation.

David Losh says

It isn't a matter of if prices will recede, it's when. I think it will be in 2014 which will be the end of a seven year cycle started in 2007.

I happen to agree and anticipate the end of the 2014 RE season will hold the top price for this round. Todays prices will no doubt be hard tested during the off season 2014-2015.
The real test for future home price (2015 and beyond) will be how todays prices hold up.

PockyClipsNow says

I highly doubt we will ever see high intrest rates again.

2015 is absolutely looking to be the time int rates do come back with fiery and a true bottom in RE will be established. Perhaps below the already so called established lows... Undoubtedly price will let us know, it will speak for itself.

chanakya4773 says

The only thing that is scientific and reliable is case shiller housing index.

FWIW, shiller proved that RE prices can be influenced by irrational exuberance... hence the name of his book.

PockyClipsNow says

Zirp and 2% mortages will prop it up. Ez lending. 5 year foreclosure timelines, workouts, loan mods - money doesnt exist its zeros and ones so there is no limit or end in sight to the manipulations.

LOL, you may very well be correct.

PockyClipsNow says

I highly doubt we will ever see high intrest rates again

Could be...depends on how old you are. But I think your scenario is pretty unimaginative and improbable, because, among other things, it assumes that the American economy will never stand on its hind legs ever again.

chanakya4773 says

The only thing that is scientific and reliable is case shiller housing index.

The Index is flawed, and most people know it. It encompasses a broad Metropolitan area, that has proved to be a mixed bag of both good, and bad Real Estate market places.

Which reminds me; I did go into great detail about how the Seattle Real Estate market place was vastly different than Phoenix, because we never had the price reductions Phoenix saw.

We did see massive price reduction in Tacoma to our South and some investors have been stuck there with less than stellar properties.

You can't blanket the Real Estate market.

Gonna be lots more JBRs after another year or two of double digit increases.

As usual you dug just deep enough to support your view.

Phoenix listings are up year over year and sales are down year over year. That is a fact!

I will note again that I am not going to resort to name calling. I see that you cannot do the same.

My source was Redfin

http://www.redfin.com/city/14240/AZ/Phoenix

Homes for sale in Phoenix UP 2.8% year over year.
Number of homes sold in Phoenix DOWN 13.1% year over year.

Feel free to link your source.

It also mirrors Maricopa county

http://www.redfin.com/county/220/AZ/Maricopa-County

For sale UP 1.6% yoy
Sale DOWN 11.4% yoy

Roberto are you really a 14 year old girl? I ask because you act like one.

Bigsby says

clearly done alright for himself with his purchases irrespective of whether
prices continue to rise or not.

Irrespective of whether prices continue to rise or not? And if they fall? If they crash? If there is another global market panic?

Bigsby says

Why do you keep trying to poke holes in what he has done then?

I am not poking holes in what he has done. We are talking about the future and I am poking holes in his vision of what the future will be. That is what investing is about, guessing what the future holds. That is why it is so funny watching him proclaim his victory. He can proclaim victory when he has liquidated for a profit, or dies while still holding his valueable property that has funded a lavish retirement. Prior to that time he has paper profits that can rapidly become paper losses.

yup1 says

Bigsby says

clearly done alright for himself with his purchases irrespective of whether

prices continue to rise or not.

Irrespective of whether prices continue to rise or not? And if they fall? If they crash? If there is another global market panic?

Oh for crying out loud. He bought a bunch of dirt cheap properties at an historically low point in the Phoenix market. Even if the prices declined substantially from here, he'd still be well ahead. Just look at his rent in contrast to his PITI. It doesn't matter to him. He has got so much room for maneuver that it's almost laughable, and yet you are still trying to make out that he has made a bad move. No, he hasn't. Short-term or long-term he is quite clearly going to do OK for himself, and more than likely, a lot better than that.

yup1 says

I am not poking hole in what he has done. We are talking about the future and I am poking holes in his vision of what the future will be. That is what investing is about, guessing what the future hold. That is why it is so funny watching him proclaim his victory. He can proclaim victory when he has liquidated for a profit, or dies while still holding his valueable property that has funded a lavish retirement. Prior to that time he has paper profits that can rapidly become paper losses.

What's he saying? That prices will go up in the near term in Phoenix? That's a stunning and outrageous prediction. Or rather it isn't. Beyond that, I don't recall him saying much. He can sit on his investments and collect his income. It's a pretty bloody good return for the money spent by anyone's standards and to argue otherwise is bloody stupid. And he says he gets $6000 a month at the minute. He isn't claiming some kind of amazingly lavish income, but that and his pension would do very nicely for most people, would it not, so I ask again, what is it that you are trying to prove?

yup1 says

I am not poking hole in what he has done. We are talking about the future and
I am poking holes in his vision of what the future will be. That is what
investing is about, guessing what the future hold. That is why it is so funny
watching him proclaim his victory. He can proclaim victory when he has
liquidated for a profit, or dies while still holding his valueable property that
has funded a lavish retirement. Prior to that time he has paper profits that can
rapidly become paper losses.

A large amount of money by investors has been put into the RE market, just like Roberto has done. They are chasing returns, playing the spread, and hoping to cash out in the future or dump it on something/somebody else if not. is it wrong? Or is it wrong because you did or didn't do the same thing?

Or are you really an alter-ego alias of Roberto that tries to reinforce his success, and does he really need to? Or not?

Bigsby says

Oh for crying out loud. He bought a bunch of dirt cheap properties at an
historically low point in the Phoenix market. Even if the prices declined
substantially from here, he'd still be well ahead. Just look at his rent in
contrast to his PITI. It doesn't matter to him. He has got so much room for
maneuver that it's almost laughable, and yet you are still trying to make out
that he has made a bad move. No, he hasn't. Short-term or long-term he is quite
clearly going to do OK for himself, and more than likely, a lot better than
that.

If incomes collapse? If rents collapse? Ever heard of the great depression? Ever heard of a global financial panic? Ever heard of a currency collapse? Water shortage? Dust bowl? Have you ever considered that the bulk of his gains are entirely due to things outside of his control, the Fed, FHA, FASB, extremely low interest rates. Oh for crying out load history doesn't repeat itself........

Bigsby says

so I ask again, what is it that you are trying to prove?

I am not trying to prove anything. He thinks that the future is bright, his rentals will stay full and the price will continue to appreciate. I think the future is bleak, good jobs are gone, incomes will continue to fall, and rents and home values will decline.

The better question is why are you looking for proof on an online forum?

yup1 says

If incomes collapse? If rents collapse? Ever heard of the great depression? Ever heard of a global financial panic? Ever heard of a currency collapse? Water shortage? Dust bowl? Have you ever considered that the bulk of his gains are entirely due to things outside of his control, the Fed, FHA, FASB, extremely low interest rates. Oh for crying out load history doesn't repeat itself........

Oh FFS, what if a giant asteroid hits the bloody planet?

His gains have come from buying at just about the perfect time in a market that overshot it's historical trend lines after the bursting of an enormous housing bubble. It doesn't matter to him what outside influences there were or are on the housing market. The fact is he bought at a very good time, and all you are doing is throwing out ridiculous what ifs in an attempt to attack his investments (whilst simultaneously commenting about how good they were - go figure).

Like I said, you, sir, really are clutching at straws and it's becoming a bit embarrassing.

yup1 says

I am not trying to prove anything. He thinks that the future is bright, his rentals will stay full and the price will continue to appreciate. I think the future is bleak, good jobs are gone, incomes will continue to fall, and rents and home values will decline.

The better question is why are you looking for proof on an online forum?

Proof? Proof of what? I own a house that I can easily afford. End of story as far as my real estate involvement goes. I simply come here for a bit of light relief, which your posts most certainly supply.

Bigsby says

Like I said, you, sir, really are clutching at straws and it's becoming a bit
embarrassing.

You are the one looking for proof on Patrick.net, talk about embarassing.

Only time will tell........

yup1 says

Bigsby says

Like I said, you, sir, really are clutching at straws and it's becoming a bit

embarrassing.

You are the one looking for proof on Patrick.net, talk about embarassing.

I'm not looking for anything (outside a spot of entertainment) from Patnet. And anyway, what is this supposed proof I'm searching for? I just thought I was here to pointlessly kill a bit of time reading froth at the mouth attacks by people like yourself on others who appear to have done a bit better with their investment decisions. But hey, you seem to have all the answers. It's just a shame that they always appear to be wrong.

Bigsby says

reading froth at the mouth attacks by people like yourself on others who appear
to have done a bit better with their investment decisions.

I realize that you do not agree with me which is fine. You never point out any of Roberto's "mouth attacks" which happen to be far more often than mine and are far more personal. I will point out that you know nothing about my own investment decisions.

yup1 says

Bigsby says

reading froth at the mouth attacks by people like yourself on others who appear

to have done a bit better with their investment decisions.

I realize that you do not agree with me which is fine. You never point out any of Roberto's "mouth attacks" which happen to be far more often than mine and are far more personal. I will point out that you know nothing about my own investment decisions.

I frequently criticize Roberto's unnecessary insults as a matter of fact, but in some cases, and with some posters, I can quite understand why he does it.

And yes, I know nothing about your investment decisions. Were they better than his?

Bigsby says

And yes, I know nothing about your investment decisions. Were they better
than his?

I have no idea I do not know what decisions he made outside of real estate.