by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 17 of 17 Search these comments
The underlying message of this is that boys are superior to women if they can only lose status and women can only gain. What I don't get is how are the inferiors running the games of the superiors? In a hierarchy of power, shouldn't that be the other way around?
I have recognized my generation as being sacrificed to the feminazi gods.
We did not achieve equality. All we achieved was ineffective men and hobbled boys who would otherwise be great men. The observations that have led me to this conclusion are readily had; one simply has to look around and use a little introspect to see it.
A court in Brussels fined him €3,000 for insulting a police officer because of her gender, Le Soir reported.
It comes as France prepares to create an offence of street harassment, described as “sexist and sexual outrage”.
The Belgian case involved a driver who was stopped for breaking the highway code. The young man – who has not been identified – insulted the police officer because of her gender, the court heard.
He was reported to have said she would be better off doing a job “adapted to women”, in a scene witnessed by several other people.
The driver was found guilty of three charges: contempt of a police officer, making threats and sexist remarks in public, and a serious violation of another person’s dignity because of her gender.
He was warned that if he failed to pay the fine, a prison term of a month would be imposed.
Competitive team games in which men test their mettle against others are universal across the world, and may have deep roots in our evolutionary past. Among hunter-gatherers, these games enable men to hone their physical skills and stamina, assess the commitment of their team members, and see how each performs under pressure. ...
"Periodic participation in such games during childhood, adolescence, and early to middle adulthood provides individuals with opportunities to viscerally assess the aggressive formidability and commitment of their own and -- when played with neighboring groups -- other coalitions as their composition and skills change through time," explains Scalise Sugiyama. "The widespread evidence for such games among hunter-gather societies suggests that the motivation to engage in them is a universal feature of human psychology, generating behavior that develops, rehearses, and refines the coalitional combat skills used in lethal raiding."
They are attracted to boys who win status contests with other boys. If you're male, however, you just can't hammer a female as hard as you would a male. Boys can't (won't) play truly competitive games with girls. It isn't clear how they can win. As the game turns into a girl's game, therefore, the boys leave. Are the universities -- particularly the humanities -- about to become a girl's game?Looks like all these things will ultimately have terrible consequences for such male dominated areas as the armed forces, fire and police protection no matter how often we're told females are as competent as males. The fact they get pregnant is already a huge drain on both financial and human resources in the military. There have been cases on Investigation Discovery of murder due to love triangles between competing males for a female soldier's affections. While I'm sure they are chosen for their provocative nature, I expect they are pretty well representative of real life in the services.
I feel like this argument needs more work. I don't understand how a fringe and rare phenomenon (even in the Bay Area) of girls trying to play in boys' sports leagues could be responsible for so many social ills.
If you're male, however, you just can't hammer a female as hard as you would a male.
Patrick saysIf you're male, however, you just can't hammer a female as hard as you would a male.
Hundreds of Catholic priests would agree.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,203,588 comments by 14,293 users - AmericanKulak, FarmersWon online now