But it’s all kind of a dated debate anyway. In another 30 years we won’t be talking about abortion in the same way we do today if medical science advances at the current pace.
You won’t go in for an abortion any longer. Instead it will be an “extraction”. Science will advance enough that a few week old fetus will be able to be extracted safely from the womb and developed in a artificial machine womb until they are adopted or enter a pro-life orphanage. This is the intended or unintended consequence of a Roe v. Wade reversal.
Baby farms.... no baby lives are killed. Female rights are left intact. Society is further burdened. Enjoy your future!
Since he was a swing vote and pro-abortion... unlikely that Trump will nominate anyone pro-abortion.
The artificial womb idea isn’t bad. We should have those anyway for women who want a baby but can’t seem to carry one to term. I suppose an extraction that saves a developing fetus would be acceptable to most. There are always lots of people who would like to adopt a baby! It’s the older kids, the ones with disabilities or criminal attitudes that present a problem finding adoptive parents. The parents who will take in a child with severe disabilities are just saints. Irresponsible selfish uterus-possessors who want “muh abortion” now aren’t even in the same universe!
Who's having babies? The Liberal teachers has everyone so fucked up the Kids can't even fuck the right hole. And those that recognize the right hole are only vicariosly diddling the right hole through Internet porn or robots.
You won’t go in for an abortion any longer. Instead it will be an “extraction”. Science will advance enough that a few week old fetus will be able to be extracted safely from the womb and developed in a artificial machine womb until they are adopted or enter a pro-life orphanage. This is the intended or unintended consequence of a Roe v. Wade reversal.
Baby farms.... no baby lives are killed. Female rights are left intact. Society is further burdened. Enjoy your future!