patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,196,097 comments by 14,053 users - brazil66, mortarmaker, NuttBoxer, Stout, Twelc2023 online now
FBI uncovers BRIBERY plot: Russian nuclear official routed millions to benefit Clinton Foundation
invite response
2017 Oct 17, 9:16am 9,744 views 49 comments
« First « Previous Comments 26 - 49 of 49 Search these comments
26
bob2356
2017 Oct 18, 6:13am
me123 says
I asked you. It's your thread. How much did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes? Simple question. Run piggy run.
bob2356 saysHow much was it for the other votes?
Ask the IRS, they know everything.
I asked you. It's your thread. How much did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes? Simple question. Run piggy run.
28
bob2356
2017 Oct 18, 10:36am
bob2356 says
Run and hide.
me123 saysbob2356 saysHow much was it for the other votes?
Ask the IRS, they know everything.
I asked you. It's your thread. How much did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes? Simple question. Run piggy run.
Run and hide.
30
bob2356
2017 Oct 18, 11:21am
me123 says
Run and hide. At least you have one talent.
bob2356 saysRun piggy run.
I already told you, we don't care what you do out in the barn.
Run and hide. At least you have one talent.
31
MrMagic
2017 Oct 18, 2:21pm
MrMagic
2017 Oct 18, 2:21pm
Team Obama’s stunning cover-up of Russian crimes.
It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.
Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.
The New York Times confirmed and followed up on Schweizer’s reporting — all of it denounced by Hillary as a partisan hit job.
The bureau even flagged the routing of millions from Russian nuclear officials to cutouts and on to Clinton Inc.
The Obama administration — anxious to “reset” US-Russian relations — kept it all under wraps, refusing to tell even top congressional intelligence figures.
And when the Obamaites in 2014 filed low-level criminal charges against a single individual over what the FBI found, they did so with little public fanfare.
“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns,” one veteran of the case told The Hill.
There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up.
http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/
It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.
Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.
The New York Times confirmed and followed up on Schweizer’s reporting — all of it denounced by Hillary as a partisan hit job.
The bureau even flagged the routing of millions from Russian nuclear officials to cutouts and on to Clinton Inc.
The Obama administration — anxious to “reset” US-Russian relations — kept it all under wraps, refusing to tell even top congressional intelligence figures.
And when the Obamaites in 2014 filed low-level criminal charges against a single individual over what the FBI found, they did so with little public fanfare.
“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns,” one veteran of the case told The Hill.
There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era cover-up.
http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/team-obamas-stunning-coverup-of-russian-crimes/
32
bob2356
2017 Oct 18, 3:43pm
How much did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes piggy?
Run and hide. Run and hide.
Run and hide. Run and hide.
33
joeyjojojunior
2017 Oct 18, 3:50pm
me123 says
But, wait a second. I thought these were private donations that nobody knew about??
How did Schweizer know in 2015??
Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.
But, wait a second. I thought these were private donations that nobody knew about??
How did Schweizer know in 2015??
42
MisdemeanorRebel
2017 Oct 22, 10:07am
MisdemeanorRebel
2017 Oct 22, 10:07am
Everybody knows the Media is "All In" for Clinton.
As I've said before, the primary Media bias is what they refuse to cover, on cover only superficially, before moving on to much smaller items that confirm their worldview.
Every reporter wants to be the one who "Brings Down Trump" not the one who "Ends the Clinton Control of the Dem Party".
As I've said before, the primary Media bias is what they refuse to cover, on cover only superficially, before moving on to much smaller items that confirm their worldview.
Every reporter wants to be the one who "Brings Down Trump" not the one who "Ends the Clinton Control of the Dem Party".
43
HEY YOU
2017 Oct 22, 11:07am
Hillary is not President.
Everything is on Trump & Republicans.
Russia is a major nuclear power & Trump hasn't taken away their nuclear weapons & ICBMs.
He's done nothing about China,either.
He doesn't care about the safety of America.
He can't stop a little rogue nation,North Korea,from it's nuclear ambitions.
What a FAILURE! His failure will not protect Republicans.
Watch the drone videos of California's fire devastation & if Trump doesn't disarm all the nuclear nations,
all of America will look like that,only worse.
Wish we had a Commander -in- Chief.
President Nero will be playing golf while America burns.
Everything is on Trump & Republicans.
Russia is a major nuclear power & Trump hasn't taken away their nuclear weapons & ICBMs.
He's done nothing about China,either.
He doesn't care about the safety of America.
He can't stop a little rogue nation,North Korea,from it's nuclear ambitions.
What a FAILURE! His failure will not protect Republicans.
Watch the drone videos of California's fire devastation & if Trump doesn't disarm all the nuclear nations,
all of America will look like that,only worse.
Wish we had a Commander -in- Chief.
President Nero will be playing golf while America burns.
44
komputodo
2017 Oct 22, 11:09am
komputodo
2017 Oct 22, 11:09am
me123 says
but it wasn't for the clintons, it was for charity.........lololololol
n the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
but it wasn't for the clintons, it was for charity.........lololololol
45
joeyjojojunior
2017 Oct 22, 11:39am
TwoScoopsMcGee says
Well, one is the President of the US and the other is in hiding.
The American people already ended the Clinton Control of the Dem Party.
Every reporter wants to be the one who "Brings Down Trump" not the one who "Ends the Clinton Control of the Dem Party".
Well, one is the President of the US and the other is in hiding.
The American people already ended the Clinton Control of the Dem Party.
46
joeyjojojunior
2017 Oct 22, 11:42am
Tenpoundbass says
NYT clearly didn't understand conditional probability and error bars, but it's hilarious that you guys think that when someone has a 90% probability of winning happens to lose, that somehow the probability must have been wrong.
Has no one in the Republican party ever taken prob and stats?
Ooops almost had it!
NYT clearly didn't understand conditional probability and error bars, but it's hilarious that you guys think that when someone has a 90% probability of winning happens to lose, that somehow the probability must have been wrong.
Has no one in the Republican party ever taken prob and stats?
47
joeyjojojunior
2017 Oct 22, 4:34pm
me123 says
And thank you for proving my point. CIC is exhibit A.
That certainly would be you, since you STILL feel Hillary won and Nate Silver was accurate with all his predictions.
And thank you for proving my point. CIC is exhibit A.
« First « Previous Comments 26 - 49 of 49 Search these comments
Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation - Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States. Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets.
Now, thanks to newly released affidavits from a case that landed one of the Russian co-conspirators, Vadim Mikerin, in jail, we learn that not only was the Obama administration aware the Russians' illegal acts in the U.S. but it may have also been fully aware that "Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow."
And guess who ran the FBI's investigation into this particular Russian plot? As The Hill notes, the Mikerin probe began in 2009 under Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, and ended in late 2015 under the controversial, former FBI Director James Comey who was relieved of his duties by President Trump.
Perhaps this is what the "most transparent" President in history meant when he told Medvedev that he would have "more flexibility" after his 2012 election.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-17/fbi-uncovered-russian-nuclear-bribery-plot-obama-approved-uranium-one-deal-netting-c