« First « Previous Comments 478 - 517 of 517 Search these comments
Reports: India Demands Migrant Visas for Job-Seekers in Trade Talks
I think this is a face losing mistake for New Delhi. Because they aren't going to get this, I think. Thus their opposition is going to rip Modi a new one for failing to do so.
Another thing that should not be permitted is health and finance information being serviced outside the US.
It simply should not be permitted, either outsourcing OR contracting.
Has to be 110% inside the USA subject to US laws by US citizens with no foreign ties.
MolotovCocktail says
I think this is a face losing mistake for New Delhi. Because they aren't going to get this, I think. Thus their opposition is going to rip Modi a new one for failing to do so.
How about they just get jobs in India? Novel concept. I know US companies abuse it for lower wages, but much of the money is going back to India. No different than illegals from Mexico and Central America. There's a reason Trump created MAGA. Wish these other countries would do that for themselves instead of on the backs of Americans. They don't and then blame us. It's the twilight zone when people, Americans, get upset about Trump's move on H1-B's.
I wonder why there are so many security breaches in medical information - could it be that the chindians are selling the info?



H-1B visa holders are paid approximately half of what an American corporation would have to pay a citizen employee. (they use a structured system).
Pausing, not stopping. Maybe for 10 minutes.
Patrick says
Pausing, not stopping. Maybe for 10 minutes.
Pausing to strategize and finding long term workarounds.
It is all about the foreign worker visas. “Many conservatives,” Michelle Goldberg continued, “were livid about an interview Trump gave to Laura Ingraham explaining the need for H1-B visas.” Trying not to gloat, she added, “Many right-wing influencers reacted with unusual fury, some posting images of burning MAGA hats.”
All this over a single interview? About a 35-year-old problem that Trump is working on? Really?
Complaints about H1B visas began almost as soon as the program was established in 1990. By 1993, Congress was already holding hearings, packed with gripes about tech companies using H1Bs to undercut wages. Labor unions, especially in manufacturing and programming, were the earliest and loudest critics. A 1998 Senate hearing featured an unforgettable and widely reported line, that companies were using H-1Bs as “indentured tech servants.”
If the H1B issue is important to you, watch this 2017 episode of 60 Minutes, describing the long-standing debate. Over 35 years of acrimony and displaced American workers, nobody ever did anything about it.
Apparently, it is nobody’s fault, either. In the Clinton, Bush, and Trump 1.0 eras, Dems blamed Republicans for “selling out American workers,” allowing “corporate indenture,” and raising visa caps. In the 2010s–2020s, Republicans hit back hard, accusing Democrats of outsourcing American jobs, blocking reforms to stop visa abuse, and citing Disney, Southern California Edison, and Silicon Valley as Democrat-aligned institutions screwing American workers.
Congress never did anything. No President except Trump ever did anything about H1Bs.
Here’s the whole disreputable history:
George H.W. Bush created the H1B system by signing Congress’ 1990 Immigration Act into law.
Clinton signed laws in 1998 and 2000 ‘temporarily’ raising the visa cap to 115,000 and then 195,000. (By 2020, it had rocketed to 300,000, including extensions.)
George W. Bush defended H-1Bs as “good for competitiveness.”
Obama expanded tech exemptions (like OPT for STEM), and H1B approvals skyrocketed.
Trump 1.0 was the first — and only — president to pull H1Bs back. Ever. He issued Executive Order 13788 (“Buy American, Hire American”). Visa approval rates plunged from ~95% to ~75%. Requests for Evidence (RFE) rates jumped above 60%. Fraud detection got aggressive. Meanwhile, Trump got zero help from Congress, not even performative help. Less than zero, actually.
Joe Biden promptly reversed all Trump’s H1B restrictions. Approval rates shot right back to 95%+. RFEs collapsed. Trump’s new wage rules were suspended.
During Trump 1.0, Congress could have helped the president. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) even filed a bipartisan H1B reform bill, the “Raise the Wage H1B Reform Act,” but Republican leadership never allowed it to the floor for a vote. The whole time the bill languished in committee, grandstanding Congressional Democrats sang epic songs about how racist Trump’s H1B rules were.
Trump stands alone as the only president who ever cracked down, and he had to do it over Congress’s dead body.
So this year, as soon as Trump got back into office, he once again started doing whatever he could without help from Congress to cut back on H1Bs. He reinstated his old rules and added new ones. After everything he has done, fighting fierce political opposition every step of the way, President Trump must now feel pretty bitter about conservative critics crucifying him for the H1B problems. ...
Because if —thanks to this media-fueled, red-on-red MAGA civil war— Trump does become a lame duck, then guess what happens next? H1Bs will never ever get fixed. Do you really think Gavin Newsom will fix H1Bs? Pritzger? Whitmer? No, H1Bs will double or triple under Democrats, of course. Think about that mortifying possibility whenever you’re tempted to complain.
I’m not saying don’t complain. I’m saying don’t help Democrats. And I’m saying: help Trump.

Only Congress can reduce the number of H1Bs
It should be the question of every incumbent and primary challenger alike: Reduce/eliminate H1Bs now to stay in office, or promise to if elected.
DemoralizerOfPanicans says
Only Congress can reduce the number of H1Bs
It should be the question of every incumbent and primary challenger alike: Reduce/eliminate H1Bs now to stay in office, or promise to if elected.
No matter what they say prior to election, they will do what's in their interest post election.
No US Citizens’: Meet the IT Firms Discriminating Against Americans
Today, it is OK to advertise a job, saying NO AMERICAN NEED TO APPLY.
“The job post for LanceSoft, an IT staffing firm committed to “diversity, equality, and inclusivity,” began innocently enough.
The $60-per-hour role would be based in Santa Clara, Calif., focus on “technical support,” and entail a 3–10 p.m. shift. Posted on Nvoids, an IT jobs aggregator, the ad described LanceSoft as an equal opportunity employer and said that the firm, one of the largest staffing agencies in the country, strives “to be as diverse as the clients and employees we partner with.”
“We embrace people of any race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender identity, and sexual orientation,” the Nov. 25 post read.
This particular job, however, would not be open to a very large group of people: citizens of the United States.
In a section titled “Visa requirement,” LanceSoft recruiter Riyaz Ansari wrote that “candidates must hold an active H1B visa”—and stated explicitly that American citizens need not apply.” ...
The Washington Free Beacon identified over two dozen job postings since 2024 that appear to bar applications from U.S. citizens. The posts were made on a variety of platforms, including Glassdoor and LinkedIn, and typically indicate a preference for H-1B visas, though some allow for other visa types as well. Several of the firms are minority-owned businesses, meaning they receive preferential access to government contracts even as they exclude U.S. workers.
« First « Previous Comments 478 - 517 of 517 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,350,598 comments by 15,721 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now