0
0
🎂

Breitbart is Dirty now!


 invite response                
2022 Oct 8, 4:18pm   776 views  7 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

They have moved their comments section off site, sort of what Fox news .com did during the 2012 election. They removed the comment section from their propaganda hit pieces glorifying Obama or forming pollical narratives. Breitbart's Disqus threads, are now moved over to a separate section from the Article. So they can do their drive by hit pieces on people and there wont be an overwhelming rebuke of it. They'll stop publishing their Patriot driven journalism and just push the AP's point of view.

Case in point.
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2022/10/08/report-hunter-bidens-drug-abuse-delaying-charges-tax-gun-related-probe/
Report: Hunter Biden’s Drug Abuse Delaying Charges in Tax, Gun-Related Probe


Hunter Biden's crimes are not that he's a drug addled womanizing tax cheat. Those things just make him a legend.
It's the family Dynasty crimes against the office, and the racketeering they do while exploiting Joe's power.

Now of course Breitbart doesn't want the readers pointing out the obvious. While they help the FBI and CIA clean it up and turn it into a Tax levy and a sentence in a drug rehab.

Comments 1 - 7 of 7        Search these comments

1   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2022 Oct 8, 4:48pm  

a lot of sites got pressured by google to remove comments section if they don’t police opinions to the once google demands everyone have
2   Patrick   2022 Oct 8, 5:05pm  

Tenpoundbass says

They have moved their comments section off site


That would be fine if they'd move the comment section to patrick.net!

I think it would not be too hard to compete with Disqus, so that a patrick.net comment section could be added to any site.
3   Karloff   2022 Oct 8, 5:42pm  

That site was done after Andrew died. It changed pretty quickly after that. I haven't read it in years.

The commie stooges just don't get it. They think that subverting and turning a personality or outlet to parrot their cause will result in that entity's fans to then follow along. This works for the leftist audience, but by and large, it doesn't work nearly as well on the right. We see the corruption and we dismiss that source as dirty.
4   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2022 Oct 8, 6:01pm  

Karloff says

The commie stooges just don't get it.

The commie stooges try to hide their Establishment bias by listing trending AP(propaganda) stories, in their "Wires" link.
Then often during a hot topic, the AP stories will spill over to their front page and seemingly try to pass itself off as a story of interest to the MAGA base.
Stories that undermine Trump and deride Trump supporters, they just relish posting every chance they get. To the point that when a Conservative tries to red pill a Liberal using Breitbart as a source. They will read those stories from AP that support the left's view, and then throw it your face, that even Breitbart thinks Trump is full shit.
5   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2022 Oct 8, 6:10pm  

Patrick says

That would be fine if they'd move the comment section to patrick.net!


It's not fine, comments in biased internet news articles has become more powerful than the press.
In this day and age, often most of the content will be skipped over and people will go right to the comments.
I don't even consider news site trust worthy that does not allow spirited debate about a story.
That and undated content, is my biggest filters for what is pure shit or not.
More often than not, some cheesy websites will dredge up an old article and and just repot it, without giving a date or any reference to when it was.
It's often done to give voters and the base false hope that something is being done. But if you investigate those articles further, you'll find that some Obama or Bush appointed Judge shot that ray of hopium months ago. It's done purely to make the base complacent.

Another cheesy Propaganda thing Breitbart has taken to in the last few weeks I've noticed. Is just midway in the story and details, they'll segue into an unrelated story, other than just another example of debauchery or violent mayhem. But the original story they just kind of nodded off on. I think it's so they don't have to go into details about the race or ethnicity of the perpetrators. I first noticed this brand of Yellow Journalism when I was in Malaysia their news papers read like that. It would talk about crime stories, robberies or a crazy man hacking up people with a machete, a vindictive person poisoning a whole wedding party. But they would always just meander off the topic and go into another story midway to avoid telling the reader that it was a Muslim or some other ethnic group that hates Malays, or Chen Asian people.
6   🎂 Tenpoundbass   2022 Oct 14, 6:50am  

Yup my initial thoughts are spot on.
Now that Breitbart has moved their comments out of the public view. The Troll Farm Glowies are matching post for post every post that is made, shitting on it and the person that wrote it. With names that suggest they are Maga minded, or Military with SGT, or Warthog in their name, to make them sound like Trump supporters that saw the Pelosi light.
Probably looking for people to drag into the J6 Holodomor.
7   Hircus   2022 Oct 14, 10:05am  

What do you mean "off site"?

I still see their comments on brietbart.com, although theyre no longer embedded into the same page as the article - they now have a dedicated page.

This may be a trick to avoid commie google rules.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions