2
0

Highland Park and Sandy Hook -- How To Use a Rebuttable Presumption


 invite response                
2022 Jul 5, 10:19am   116 views  1 comment

by Ceffer   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

"To repeat my new rule: When you see (as a hypothetical 'reasonable man' would see) that even one itty bitty element in an official narrative is a lie, you should venture to make a presumption that the case is deceitful in toto. Don't let any other aspect of the story force you to accept the whole kit and kaboodle.

Dig your heels in and insist that the purveyor of the story rebut your presumption by producing evidence. "Hey, FBI, let's see that globbed-up blood from Highland Park under a microscope. If we're not persuaded of its authenticity, you lose the whole case."

That was not my method for the last 16 years -- I laboriously tried to elucidate the technical wrongdoing of prosecutors and judges.

Let's look at a few things we could have jumped on as to the dishonesty of the "narrative." Granted, many activists did jump on such things -- all the way back to JFK's assassination, but today I re-list them under the new approach.

I will call these items "the swipe card" of the day -- each of them can stand alone to make a presumption that the official story can't be true:

1995 -- OKC bombing. Local police officer Terrance Yeakey found explosives in the building, and then he was murdered. Note: I think it's all right to make a rebuttable presumption that any whistleblowers death is a murder, but we'll save that for another day. For now, the finding of explosives in the OKC building is swipe card enough.

2001 -- The crash in Shanksville, PA on September 11, 2001. The lack of plane parts visible to the eye is swipe card enough. Nota bene: citizens should not fall for put-offs like "We are not allowed to show you the plane parts." Why the hell is it a secret? There is no reason to keep us from viewing the crash site when the government says it's definite that this hijacked commercial flight (AA93) crashed in Pennsylvania.

2013 -- Marathon bombing. "Hey, Boston medical leaders, tell us how Jeff Baumann was able to sit up, in a wheelchair, after losing two legs, and not die of blood loss. Come on, fancy doctors, Boston is the top medical city in the world, you can handle it!"

1996 -- Massacre at the Port Arthur historic site. An employee of that site, Ms Wendy Scurr, saw the dead bodies and helped the wounded, but she was not allowed by the prosecutor to appear as a witness. "OK, Crown Prosecutor, you lose. We Aussies are not so stupid that we can't see that your keeping Wendy out of court is proof of your chicanery. It's the swipe card of the century. Oh, and by the way, we citizen-arrest you right now for obstructing justice."

2012 -- Sandy Hook (unreal) school shooting in December. Wolfgang Halbig has long since got the proof that food supplies for Sandy Hook school had been diverted to another location since September, indicating that the school had been closed and thus no students were in attendance. It was a ghost school, so to speak. All right, Newtown Police Spokesman Kehoe, let's hear your explanation for the school closure. Or give us your proof that the food supplies did go to Sandy Hook -- show us where Mr Halbig is wrong. Or just admit now that the entire shooting was fake -- this may win you some leniency at your sentencing.

Anyone wishing to send me their fave swipe-card story, may do so to the contact page at my website: ConstitutionAndTruth.com. But please, no more that 100 words for each. And no photos for which the source is other than media or officials, as I would have no way to check out any personal photos or videos. You can observe my degree of fussiness in my book "Boston's Marathon Bombing: What Can law Do?" -- a pdf of which is linked below."
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=202848

Comments 1 - 1 of 1        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2022 Jul 5, 10:21am  

Swipe cards and rebuttal presumption: the new standards to judge ostensible false flags. Demanding a standard of proof beyond the shock and awe stormtrooper patsy bullshit with complicit agitprop MSM.

I don't vaguely have any idea of Sandy Hook, my brain refuses to engage with that one for even a fraction of a second. However, from Kennedy onward, this shit is getting predictable, once you spot the standard Satanic inversions and shock tactics.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions