by null ➕follow (4) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 52 Next » Last » Search these comments
Esp now that Russia just began mobilizing 10,000 tanks to deploy down in Ukraine.
In exchange to what? A treaty? Security guarantees? Didn't they already have plenty of these? How did it work out for them?
Esp now that Russia just began mobilizing 10,000 tanks to deploy down in Ukraine
Outdated against what? The M1 Abrams or Leopard 2s the Ukranians are (not) fielding?
So on the negotiated settlement side we have:
Chomsky
Trump
Kissinger
So on the negotiated settlement side we have:
Chomsky
Trump
Kissinger
How about Ukraine keeps fucking up the hapless Russian losers, let Putin keep sending them into the meat grinder until he’s assassinated.
o if my neighbor decides to start kidnapping my children, kills some and destroys my garage, I should give him my yard so he will stop?
EBGuy saysSo on the negotiated settlement side we have:
Chomsky
Trump
Kissinger
Trump has said on record that he would have sent jets and more to Ukraine (2.05 in video). I suppose after Russian ass has been kicked, it would be time to negotiate...on not Russian terms.
https://rumble.com/vy31kp-trump-says-us-needs-to-get-off-the-sidelines-in-ukraines-fight-for-survival.html
Patnetters should listen more to what Trump says, he has been quite pro-Ukrainian. This is quite an illuminating interview, which will of course be dismissed by many here. Perhaps Trump has become a CRISIS ACTOR! or it is ADVANCED CGI! or he has been threatened with MONKEY POX!
Patnetters should listen more to what Trump says
Bd6r says
I believe those are T-62 which are severely outdated (they stopped producing them in earl 70's). I did not expect that Russians will run out of semi-modern weapons that quickly.
Outdated against what? The M1 Abrams or Leopard 2s the Ukranians are (not) fielding?
If Trump had been in office he would have engaged militarily which is why Russia didn’t invade while he was in office.
HunterTits says
Bd6r says
I believe those are T-62 which are severely outdated (they stopped producing them in earl 70's). I did not expect that Russians will run out of semi-modern weapons that quickly.
Outdated against what? The M1 Abrams or Leopard 2s the Ukranians are (not) fielding?
T-62s are outdated against pretty much everyting. No reactive armor, weak 115mm cannon, it's fucking pathetic really.
Def-ly outdated against Stugna/Javelin/NLAW/T-64BM/T-72 (AMT/M/M1/M1R) and even fucking BTR-4.
T-62s are outdated against pretty much everyting. No reactive armor, weak 115mm cannon, it's fucking pathetic really.
When you installl oat meal for brains behind a barbed wire fence surrounded by 10,000 troops after a faking an election, well… coups have consequences.
Eric Holder saysT-62s are outdated against pretty much everyting. No reactive armor, weak 115mm cannon, it's fucking pathetic really.
Exactly the reason for the 2nd amendment! Everyone should be allowed to own a panzerfaust if they can't afford a modern antitank missile, just in case.
Bd6r saysPatnetters should listen more to what Trump says
Nah, they'd rather agree with that Ocasio-Cortez cunt if it confirms their (rather inexplicable) hots for Putler, LOL.
bribery/kickback scheme.
richwicks says
bribery/kickback scheme.
Post proof of bribery/kickbacks scheme in the lend-lease act or GTFO. It's easy to post bullshit propaganda.
richwicks says
bribery/kickback scheme.
Post proof of bribery/kickbacks scheme in the lend-lease act or GTFO. It's easy to post bullshit propaganda.
So if my neighbor decides to start kidnapping my children, kills some and destroys my garage, I should give him my yard so he will stop?
So if my neighbor decides to start kidnapping my children, kills some and destroys my garage, I should give him my yard so he will stop?
No he would not. Ukraine is not a US problem. The sanctions is all he would have done. Maybe made a few phone calls to Europe that would have been like, "You so worried now, then you fork up the $$$$ and send your kids to go fight."
RWSGFY saysBut they have a fucking shitload of them.
Exactly.
Ukraine is toast. Period
HunterTits saysUkraine is toast. Period
We've heard that for last 3 months. First a few days and they are toast, then a few weeks, etc. Not toast yet.
BUT NOW THAT GLORIOUS T-62s HAVE ENTERED THE BATTLE IT'S A MATTER OF HOURS, NOT DAYS!!
HunterTits saysUkraine is toast. Period
We've heard that for last 3 months. First a few days and they are toast, then a few weeks, etc. Not toast yet.
time on Russia's side or Ukraine's and their ally predator's side?
richwicks saystime on Russia's side or Ukraine's and their ally predator's side?
Neither, the question is who will collapse faster.
Russia is better off today than they were a year ago.
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 52 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,189,956 comments by 13,850 users - mell online now