Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
Have all had one or more conservative Presidents or Populous leading candidate needled by their DOJ lawfare.
While corrupt Liberal leaders everywhere scoff at the laws, and flaunt their double standards in everyone's face with impunity. It's fucking slickening.
Yeah conservatives are as clean as Dick Cheney and George Bush.
A political party of volunteers alone seems like it would lose to any party with full-time employees who can stay on top of elections all the time.
Major Gwen Anderson: Why did you keep kicking him? You had already won the fight. Did you enjoy it?
Ender Wiggin: No... knocking him down was the first fight. I wanted to win all the next ones too, so that he'd leave me alone.
FarmersWon saysYeah conservatives are as clean as Dick Cheney and George Bush.
Try to feign that you're paying attention and you understand the conversation. These have all been populist Nationalist leaders. Not cut in the wool Conservatives. Remember Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Angela Merkle are establishment approved. But nice name dropping. That's like people still talking about how bad Jimmy Carter was, when talking about the Communist, that hereto forth, nothing in the world has been like these people parading around as Democrats.
If a political party need full-time employees, then it needs money. If it needs money, then it needs a way of getting money.
Donations cause corruption. Large donors always expect laws and regulations to be bent in their favor.
So is there a way for a political party to exist without being corrupt?
Perhaps an endowment could provide the income needed for long-term operations without regular donations.
Could an endowment be managed honestly, or would the endowment itself attract embezzlers and worse, steer the party to act in the interest of the endowment rather than the interests of party members?