3
0

Just a coincidence, I am sure


 invite response                
2021 Nov 25, 9:17am   429 views  14 comments

by Bd6r   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109

Denninger analyzes death from various vaccine lots and the death distribution is statistically improbable. Long read, but worth it.

Pfizer has 395 unique lot numbers associated with at least one death and, again, there are a few that are obviously bogus. But again, evenly distribution my ass; there is a wild over-representation with one lot, EN6201, being associated with 117 deaths and fewer than 20 are associated with more than 50. [similar results for all vaccines analyzed]

The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body. The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem. The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.") While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well.

In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance. The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure.

Comments 1 - 14 of 14        Search these comments

1   mell   2021 Nov 25, 10:09am  

This whole thing gets stranger by the day
2   Bd6r   2021 Nov 25, 10:20am  

As if we are ruled by reptilians and David Icke has ben right.
3   Hircus   2021 Nov 25, 10:31am  

I didn't read the orig article yet, but from this post, the problem is that some lots kill at high rates, while other lots dont? And they accounted for the fact that some lots go to certain groups, like all old people, and age didnt pan out as an explanation - the lots # itself seems to be the variable?

Maybe the explanation is that they were trying vax variations on people without telling them? Using the public as guinea pigs?

I've always imagined this scenario possible - if a pandemic were to get serious enough, they may allow lies and experimentation on the public as an act of desperation because it may save lives if they can find an effective treatment faster.
4   Karloff   2021 Nov 25, 10:36am  

Was anyone able to determine the sizes of the lots? If the dangerous lot happened to be 20x the size of a lot that was shown to result in 1/20 of the deaths, then it's a statistical non-event, and they're all just "equally dangerous".
5   AmericanKulak   2021 Nov 25, 10:47am  

Experimental mRNA vaccine being mass manufactured for the first time. Meanwhile, dead/attuned virus vaccines are not given EUAs. It's all bullshit.
6   mell   2021 Nov 25, 10:56am  

CaptainHorsePaste says
Experimental mRNA vaccine being mass manufactured for the first time. Meanwhile, dead/attuned virus vaccines are not given EUAs. It's all bullshit.


Exactly. That's actually my main reasoning for proof that something is afoot. Even novavax s protein based vaccine has faced delay after delay despite much more favorable safety profile and efficacy. Only experimental gene therapies are green lighted. Covaxin? Get outta here
7   Bd6r   2021 Nov 25, 11:02am  

Hircus says
And they accounted for the fact that some lots go to certain groups, like all old people, and age didnt pan out as an explanation - the lots # itself seems to be the variable?

Yes, he accounts for that. There is no correlation between age of recipients and death rates.

Hircus says
Maybe the explanation is that they were trying vax variations on people without telling them? Using the public as guinea pigs?


That is my suspicion, given Nuttboxers yesterday post about Slovenia.

Karloff says
Was anyone able to determine the sizes of the lots?


I believe lot sizes are about the same.
8   Patrick   2021 Nov 25, 11:19am  

Bd6r says
That is my suspicion, given Nuttboxers yesterday post about Slovenia.


Makes sense to me. Criminals like Pfauci, Collins, and Bourla would of course experiment on the public.

And of course they would have special saline doses for the people they are paying off.
9   mell   2021 Nov 25, 11:48am  

It's weird - it's still accessible but not showing up at the MT front page anymore
10   Bd6r   2021 Nov 25, 11:59am  

mell says
It's weird - it's still accessible but not showing up at the MT front page anymore


try https://market-ticker.org/nad
11   Onvacation   2021 Nov 25, 1:05pm  

Hircus says
it may save lives if they can find an effective treatment faster.

Like Ivermectin?

They aren't trying to save lives.
12   Hircus   2021 Nov 25, 2:22pm  

Ok, I read the page now. Very interesting, but we need the lot sizes.

Different batches, manufactured at different facilities, at different times of the year, have potential to be different sizes. I would expect batch sizes to potentially get larger as time went on and production scale increased.

My money is on lot sizes not explaining this away, unless they intentionally lie about the lot sizes...
13   Bd6r   2021 Nov 25, 2:56pm  

Hircus says
My money is on lot sizes not explaining this away, unless they intentionally lie about the lot sizes...

I doubt that production process would allow for such widely different lot sizes. 10-20% may be, not more.
14   RWSGFY   2021 Nov 25, 3:12pm  

Onvacation says
Hircus says
it may save lives if they can find an effective treatment faster.

Like Ivermectin?

They aren't trying to save lives.


SHUT YOUR HORSE MOUTH!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions