patrick.net

Recently saw a clip of John Walsh the 'America's Most Wanted'/anti-crime guy in a studio interview saying if we don't like what is going on with our country we need to get out there and VOTE. This seems to be a common quip from the establishment regardless of party affiliation or ideology and is quite the so-called 'normie' approach to all socio-political problems we face, but if this were a valid solution, how did we get here in the first place? All the voting nonsense got us right where we are today, at the crossroads where 'Brave New World' meets '1984'. If it were 'real' in any sense of the word, recognizing the financial implications of each vote would require a chain of custody for each ballot drop box under the tightest of security complete with armored car level transport. However each ballot box has the security level of a public waste bin (see picture above). Clearly, the voting process and elections are not 'real'. Its Kabuki Theater as a passifier, nothing more. Voting - regardless of who or which way you vote - is essentially your consent to this nonsense. So I think the answer, or valid course of action is 180 degrees opposite of what the establishment tells us to do: do NOT give your consent, do not allow them to harvest & suck the loosh out of you by simple radical inactivism and non-compliance with any of their suggestions or dictates. If enough people did this in large numbers it would be impossible for them to claim legitimacy of any sort. This also saves you from the mental anguish the next day when you find out all the good candidates or solutions have inevitably failed.

PerfectlyFlawed says

If enough people did this in large numbers it would be impossible for them to claim legitimacy of any sort.

nope, they will manufacture "98% voted and 97% voted for Dear Leader Joe Bidet". That was what went on in Soviet Union, and we are swiftly approaching communist apparatchik-style "elections" and "democracy"

Bd6r says

PerfectlyFlawed says

If enough people did this in large numbers it would be impossible for them to claim legitimacy of any sort.

nope, they will manufacture "98% voted and 97% voted for Dear Leader Joe Bidet". That was what went on in Soviet Union, and we are swiftly approaching communist apparatchik-style "elections" and "democracy"

But as a result, look what happened to the Soviet Union - it DISSOLVED (bcuz it wasnt percieved as legitimate anymore, regardless of 'reported' voter turnout).

PerfectlyFlawed says

But as a result, look what happened to the Soviet Union - it dissolved (bcuz it wasnt percieved as legitimate anymore, regardless of 'reported' voter turnout).

oil prices dropped and it ran out of money. They could have kept up the façade for decades if not for that.

Apparently not

I mean, can anyone in a right mind believe that Joe the Dementia got a Gazillion votes, most votes ever for a President? And if roughly half of the population believes this, then what is the difference between adding 10% of votes and 60% of votes? Enough morons will still believe that all is fine and we have SAFE! and SECURE! elections.