4
0

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?


 invite response                
2021 Sep 21, 9:10am   541 views  13 comments

by Al_Sharpton_for_President   ➕follow (5)   💰tip   ignore  

Bulk of COVID-19 per capita deaths occur in elderly with high comorbidities.

Per capita COVID-19 deaths are negligible in children.

Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term.

Clinical trials did not address long-term effects most relevant to children.

High post-inoculation deaths reported in VAERS (very short-term).

This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X


Comments 1 - 13 of 13        Search these comments

1   WookieMan   2021 Sep 21, 9:53am  

My kids aren't getting it. Zero shits given what the FDA or CDC have to say about it. Almost 3% of students and staff have gotten Covid in the first month of school in our district. Likely 5-6% for those that didn't get tested but had it. That means it's actively spreading through school. Masks don't work. We ended up with about 8% positive tests last year with part time attendance and 1/2 full classes.

All districts in IL are required to track active cases. We have more than enough data to understand WTF this is. We gotta stop fucking with kids minds and even adults. Let's just be normal.

I'm pretty sure it's in our house right now. I'm about to take a nap. The kids all have coughs. Wife slept in (by our standards) and didn't do the gym and we were in bed by 10pm central. No fever, just exhausted. Hydrating and gonna rest.
2   clambo   2021 Sep 21, 10:35am  

It doesn’t make sense to me to vaccinate children for the Wuhan virus.

On NHK Japan news last week they reported the first death of a teenager in Japan (population 126 million)
3   stereotomy   2021 Sep 21, 11:08am  

I'm glad the CCP/PLA wasn't yet able to attach a lethal payload to the highly infectious vector that they had developed before it leaked out. We'd be looking at "The Stand" type mortality.
4   stereotomy   2021 Sep 21, 11:10am  

Which also begs the question, given the very real and demonstrated ADE effects in the vaxxed, is this just the prep for the real kill?
5   Bd6r   2021 Sep 21, 11:12am  

Al_Sharpton_for_President says
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Because those "we" are idiots.
6   Shaman   2021 Sep 21, 11:59am  

Bd6r says
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Because those "we" are idiots.


We are vaxxing kids to save old people. We are killing kids to save the old.
It’s sick and wrong, and an indication of social and cultural decay.
7   WookieMan   2021 Sep 21, 1:25pm  

Shaman says
We are vaxxing kids to save old people. We are killing kids to save the old.

Problem is the old get to make the decisions. Guys like Fauci. Whatever your thoughts on gays, he completely fucked them over with AIDS. Now he wants to fuck your kids over. This guy should have been fired a long time ago, yet he somehow keeps one of the highest paying Federal Government jobs. He makes more than POTUS, isn't elected and has no financial accountability with investments. Nothing to see there.... lol.
8   Patrick   2021 Sep 21, 2:17pm  

Bd6r says
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Because those "we" are idiots.


I think they are more corrupt than stupid.

Pfauci works for Pfizer, not us.
9   mell   2021 Sep 21, 10:32pm  

In need of some perspectives here: Imagine the following hypothetical scenario aka "asking for a friend": Due to long ago separation and joint custody there is (non-binding) mediation and the experimental agents for a 10 yr old boy came up and it was explicitly agreed upon to let the data speak and involve the pediatrician only wrt to ok'ing natural supplementation. Not only did it become apparent that "other sources" / "friends" etc. are trying to influence towards the jab, following the session the agreement was immediately broken with an email to the MD giving away the mediation and requesting "guidance" on the jabs instantly. How would you proceed wrt letting the sessions bust after this debacle and also wrt their surrounding "friends" where a mostly friendly relationship was kept, but there is the trade off of "letting it happen without doing anything" just to maintain non-essential acquaintances and having this heavily weigh on ones conscience. It seems like it's time to speak clearly and act with direct consequences if one doesn't want to be asked whether they did everything to prevent pfauxcis handlers from succeeding with their dirty evil deeds. And of course it's highly personal. A battle in court may be won or lost and painful either way, but at least everything was tried to prevent it.
11   WookieMan   2021 Sep 23, 10:47am  

Patrick says
Vaccinating kids – the debate heats up

5 years regardless of approval is my timeline. Even then probably not. We already know it's not a long term, permanent vaccine and the virus itself doesn't kill kids. I didn't read the link, but there's not much debate to be had if you're a responsible parent on THIS vaccine. My kids have all other vaccines beside annual flu. Because that doesn't work either.
12   Patrick   2021 Oct 16, 10:43am  


Overall conclusions

The people with myriad comorbidities in the age range where most deaths with COVID-19 occurred were in very poor health. Their deaths did not seem to increase all-cause mortality as shown in several studies. If they hadn't died with COVID-19, they probably would have died from the flu or many of the other comorbidities they had. We can't say for sure that many/most died from COVID-19 because of: 1) how the PCR tests were manipulated to give copious false positives and 2) how deaths were arbitrarily attributed to COVID-19 in the presence of myriad comorbidities.

The graphs presented in this paper indicate that the frail injection recipients receive minimal benefit from the inoculation. Their basic problem is a dysfunctional immune system, resulting in part or in whole from a lifetime of toxic exposures and toxic behaviors. They are susceptible to either the wild virus triggering the dysfunctional immune system into over-reacting or under-reacting, leading to poor outcomes or the injection doing the same.

This can be illustrated by the following analogy. A person stands in a bare metal enclosure. What happens when the person lights a match and drops it on the floor depends on what is on the floor. If the floor remains bare metal, the match burns for a few seconds until extinguished. If there is a sheet of paper on the floor under the match, the match and the paper will burn for a short time until both are extinguished. If, however, the floor is covered with ammonium nitrate and similar combustible/explosive materials, a major explosion will result! For COVID-19, the wild virus is the match. The combustible materials are the toxic exposures and toxic behaviors. If there are no biomarker ‘footprints’ from toxic exposures and toxic behaviors, nothing happens. If there are significant biomarker ‘footprints’ from toxic exposures and toxic behaviors, bad outcomes result.

Adequate safety testing of the COVID-19 inoculations would have provided a distribution of the outcomes to be expected from ‘lighting the match’. Since adequate testing was not performed, we have no idea how many combustible materials are on the floor, and what the expected outcomes will be from ‘lighting the match’.

The injection goes two steps further than the wild virus because 1) it contains the instructions for making the spike protein, which several experiments are showing can cause vascular and other forms of damage, and 2) it bypasses many front-line defenses of the innate immune system to enter the bloodstream directly in part. Unlike the virus example, the injection ensures there will always be some combustible materials on the floor, even if there are no other toxic exposures or behaviors. In other words, the spike protein and the surrounding LNP are toxins with the potential to cause myriad short-, mid-, and long-term adverse health effects even in the absence of other contributing factors! Where and when these effects occur will depend on the biodistribution of the injected material. Pfizer’s own biodistribution studies have shown the injected material can be found in myriad critical organs throughout the body, leading to the possibility of multi-organ failure. And these studies were from a single injection. Multiple injections and booster shots may have cumulative effects on organ distributions of inoculant!

The COVID-19 reported deaths are people who died with COVID-19, not necessarily from COVID-19. Likewise, the VAERS deaths are people who have died following inoculation, not necessarily from inoculation.

As stated before, CDC showed that 94 % of the reported deaths had multiple comorbidities, thereby reducing the CDC's numbers attributed strictly to COVID-19 to about 35,000 for all age groups. Given the number of high false positives from the high amplification cycle PCR tests, and the willingness of healthcare professionals to attribute death to COVID-19 in the absence of tests or sometimes even with negative PCR tests, this 35,000 number is probably highly inflated as well.

On the latter issue, both Virginia Stoner [85] and Jessica Rose [86] have shown independently that the deaths following inoculation are not coincidental and are strongly related to inoculation through strong clustering around the time of injection. Our independent analyses of the VAERS database reported in Appendix 1 confirmed these clustering findings.

Additionally, VAERS historically has under-reported adverse events by about two orders-of-magnitude, so COVID-19 inoculation deaths in the short-term could be in the hundreds of thousands for the USA for the period mid-December 2020 to the end of May 2021, potentially swamping the real COVID-19 deaths. Finally, the VAERS deaths reported so far are for the very short term. We have no idea what the death numbers will be in the intermediate and long-term; the clinical trials did not test for those.

The clinical trials used a non-representative younger and healthier sample to get EUA for the injection. Following EUA, the mass inoculations were administered to the very sick (and first responders) initially, and many died quite rapidly. However, because the elderly who died following COVID-19 inoculation were very frail with multiple comorbidities, their deaths could easily be attributed to causes other than the injection (as should have been the case for COVID-19 deaths as well).

Now the objective is the inoculation of the total USA population. Since many of these potential serious adverse effects have built-in lag times of at least six months or more, we won't know what they are until most of the population has been inoculated, and corrective action may be too late.
13   Al_Sharpton_for_President   2021 Oct 16, 10:52am  

While some aware people know how incompetent elected leaders can be, who are many times there by virtue of an MSM aided popularity contest, it is when a real or fake crisis arises that their incompetence becomes evident to the many. And it is usually always the case that leaders ignore the valuable advice, that when you find yourself in a hole, quit digging.

The reality is that so many people did not like Trump, while knowing little to nothing of his policies or the results of his leadership, that even a near cadaver swamp creature would get their vote. Stupid chlidren voting their feelinzzzzz.

And now that a disastrous policy of mass vaccination with experimental gene therapies is proving to be the wrong direction, the sick swamp creatures are doubling down, and dealing out punishments to anyone who dare points out the naked emperors, and their disastrous follies,

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions