3
0

Why printers add secret tracking dots


 invite response                
2021 Jul 31, 11:50pm   393 views  8 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170607-why-printers-add-secret-tracking-dots

In this case, the FBI has not said publicly that these microdots were used to help identify their suspect, and the bureau declined to comment for this article. The US Department of Justice, which published news of the charges against Winner, also declined to provide further clarification.

In a statement, The Intercept said, “Winner faces allegations that have not been proven. The same is true of the FBI’s claims about how it came to arrest Winner.”

But the presence of microdots on what is now a high-profile document (against the NSA’s wishes) has sparked great interest.

Based on their positions when plotted against a grid, they denote specific hours, minutes, dates and numbers
“Zooming in on the document, they were pretty obvious,” says Ted Han at cataloguing platform Document Cloud, who was one of the first to notice them. “It is interesting and notable that this stuff is out there.”

Another observer was security researcher Rob Graham, who published a blog post explaining how to identify and decode the dots. Based on their positions when plotted against a grid, they denote specific hours, minutes, dates and numbers. Several security experts who decoded the dots came up with the same print time and date.

Microdots have existed for many years. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) maintains a list of colour printers known to use them. The images below, captured by the EFF, demonstrate how to decode them...


Comments 1 - 8 of 8        Search these comments

1   richwicks   2021 Aug 1, 1:43am  

Patrick says
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20170607-why-printers-add-secret-tracking-dots

In this case, the FBI has not said publicly that these microdots were used to help identify their suspect, and the bureau declined to comment for this article. The US Department of Justice, which published news of the charges against Winner, also declined to provide further clarification.

In a statement, The Intercept said, “Winner faces allegations that have not been proven. The same is true of the FBI’s claims about how it came to arrest Winner.”

But the presence of microdots on what is now a high-profile document (against the NSA’s wishes) has sparked great interest.

Based on their positions when plotted against a grid, they denote specific hours, minutes, dates and numbers
“Zooming in on the document, they were pretty obvious,” says ...


So, in the future if you're going to print off a document to steal it, make certain you scan in a copy of the document, and print it again. That will write over the original dots, and you and up with an OR of the microdots. Good to know!

But really - why would you make a hard copy anyhow?
2   Patrick   2021 Aug 1, 12:32pm  

And it can be used to link two printouts to each other.
3   HeadSet   2021 Aug 1, 7:19pm  

Patrick says
And it can be used to link two printouts to each other.

And can it be used to see who printed the phoney ballots?
4   Patrick   2021 Aug 1, 7:30pm  

Now that would be very interesting!
5   FarmersWon   2021 Aug 2, 9:46am  

... And I was stupid enough to believe that Technology will usher in new era of liberty by democratizing communication channel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_surveillance_in_China
Mass surveillance in China is the network of monitoring systems used by the Chinese government to monitor Chinese citizens. It is primarily conducted through the government, although non-publicized corporate surveillance in connection with the Chinese government has been speculated to occur. China monitors its citizens through Internet, camera as well as through other digital technologies.[2][3] It has become increasingly widespread under General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping's administration.[4][5]


We need "personal encryption of network packets" and "photon absorption to deny camera snoop" or go back to 1950s.
6   Booger   2021 Aug 15, 6:09pm  

So if you use a regular black and white laser printer, your good, right?
7   AmericanKulak   2021 Aug 15, 6:20pm  

Booger says
So if you use a regular black and white laser printer, your good, right?


I wouldn't count on it. Don't trust anything in the new century. This article is from 2005:
https://www.eff.org/wp/investigating-machine-identification-code-technology-color-laser-printers

But since then, they've added Date and Time to the Model, Serial Number, and Manufacturer. And it's BOTH Ink Jet and Laser. I'd be shocked if there wasn't some still undetected mark they put on B/W ones, too.

Beyond the nannystate, I've noticed printers in general are less economical than ever. Think I'll pick up an old Dot Matrix from the 90s. My old man had one with paper that was pre-inked, and you could run the printer without ink and it would stamp the paper slightly. That shit was dirt cheap - but very faint, and really only good for hard copies.

But I had lots of C64 Key Binding print outs that were good enough for my eyes.

FYI Much of the world is still very much into hard copy, and many people still read Print Newspapers and many small businesses, esp. in VAT countries, use Receipt Printers running off ancient XP machines. All over South America for one.
8   Patrick   2021 Aug 15, 6:23pm  

Time to start slightly smearing printed images.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions