7
0

Why Millennials Should Not Be Allowed Near Anything That Happened Before They Were Born


 invite response                
2021 Jul 16, 11:03am   580 views  9 comments

by null   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  



They blew it FOUR ways:

1) It was Neil Armstrong
2) Moon is not a planet
3) Armstrong didn't say 'a man'. He wanted to, but it didn't come out that way or the transmission cut out.
4) “...one giant leap for mankind.”

fucktards. NY Daily News did pull this tho after they were savaged in the comments.

Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2021 Jul 16, 11:06am  

SATs are racis.
2   Tenpoundbass   2021 Jul 16, 11:09am  

I bet the author is a black transvestite, that practices Muslim, and only speaks Spanish with the preferred gender pronoun, "Libtard".

The deck of sensibility is really stacked against IT.
3   Rin   2021 Jul 16, 11:10am  

Hold it, even REM's Michael Stipe said, "If you believe, they put a man on the moon"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLxpNiF0YKs

In other words, starting in '92, it was ok to say that the landing may have not happened.
4   richwicks   2021 Jul 16, 12:23pm  

Rin says
Hold it, even REM's Michael Stipe said, "If you believe, they put a man on the moon"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLxpNiF0YKs

In other words, starting in '92, it was ok to say that the landing may have not happened.


My great grandmother never believed it. When she was a little girl, she rode to school in a horse and buggy though. She saw the invention of radio, film, telephones, television, color television, human flight, the automobile, and early computers.

She was like "no F'ing way did we land on the moon!" - and I can't blame her.

Honestly, I think it's perfectly possible that some of the footage was faked but I find it highly unlikely that we've not made it to the moon.

HunterTits says
fucktards. NY Daily News did pull this tho after they were savaged in the comments.


And dear god, they couldn't even be bothered to consult Wikipedia. If I was writing for a nationally syndicated publication, I'd check even the facts that I was already certain of.
5   Ceffer   2021 Jul 16, 12:33pm  

I believe that large parts of the moon landings were stage managed for effect and publicity i.e. faked.

If somebody went there, they weren't joking and chortling and swinging golf clubs, they were probably in a constant cold sweat to do the mission and get back alive, no time for frivolity and chit chat. There may have been alternate teams, who if they actually got there and back, could have died young from radiation exposure. Astronauts as part of their training were sworn to high secrecy, meaning they were authorized to lie to protect their covers.

Everybody who sees the lunar modules are surprised at what tin cans they are, and the computers used were primitive with less power than hand held calculators.... and yet?

Russia abandoned a massive program to get to the moon (which they actually managed to keep secret for decades) with the succinct remark that they came to the conclusion that they didn't believe they could get an astronaut to the moon and back alive. Of course, it could just have been the massive sunk costs.
6   AmericanKulak   2021 Jul 16, 6:54pm  

Ceffer says
Russia abandoned a massive program to get to the moon (which they actually managed to keep secret for decades) with the succinct remark that they came to the conclusion that they didn't believe they could get an astronaut to the moon and back alive. Of course, it could just have been the massive sunk costs.


This was dude to inter-agency policking in Russia, they decided to go with the N1 but it created the biggest non-nuclear explosion in history up until that time in the 60s. They lost so much time to get a heavy lift rocket they couldn't catch up. By the time the Apollo craft went around the moon, they knew they had lost. Van Allen Belt will not make you deadly ill. I believe Buzz Aldrin, a man of character and toughness.
7   Ceffer   2021 Jul 16, 7:32pm  

With the moon stuff, if you fake a part of something as policy, you leave observers with the problem of what is fake and what is real. The fake parts have been demonstrated pretty well, but the question remains, what were the real parts. I think that some day maybe that will be sorted when the actual history is no longer politically embarrassing. It does seem that somebody went there and got back, but who really knows with all of the official fakery known from the government.

Space is extraordinarily hostile without major buffers. Were those space craft and suits actually sufficient buffers, since everything exposed to sunlight would have been hundreds of degrees hot, and everything in shadow would have been hundreds of degrees cold. Traditional film can't even be left in low orbit without fogging from radiation, and yet they claim that without extreme shielding in cameras film photography made it for the duration in space and back to give us hundreds of snap shots. Even the manufacturer of the Hasselblad cameras didn't believe it.

The public was beguiled by low budget sci fi films that made these environments seem less hostile than they are.
8   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2021 Jul 16, 10:21pm  

When you grew up being taught by boomer parents that you’re a unique snowflake due to the turd you pinched off in the morning, you tend not to be detail oriented, or even concerned at all with how good a job you do.
9   HeadSet   2021 Jul 17, 7:22am  

Ceffer says
yet they claim that without extreme shielding in cameras film photography made it for the duration in space and back to give us hundreds of snap shots. Even the manufacturer of the Hasselblad cameras didn't believe it.

They did use a special film made by Kodak especially for those conditions.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions