patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,190,214 comments by 13,855 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now
Yes, the mRNA "vaccines" are a repurposed failed gene therapy technology.
invite response
2021 Jul 13, 4:14am 582 views 21 comments
Comments 1 - 21 of 21 Search these comments
1
Patrick
2021 Jul 13, 7:36am
Patrick
2021 Jul 13, 7:36am
People claim that the mRNA jab cannot modify your DNA, but that's not true.
https://scitechdaily.com/new-discovery-shows-human-cells-can-write-rna-sequences-into-dna-challenges-central-principle-in-biology/
It looks like the vaxx can actually modify your DNA after all.
https://scitechdaily.com/new-discovery-shows-human-cells-can-write-rna-sequences-into-dna-challenges-central-principle-in-biology/
It looks like the vaxx can actually modify your DNA after all.
2
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Jul 13, 8:31am
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Jul 13, 8:31am
Could mRNA vaccines permanently alter DNA? Recent science suggests they might
Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.
Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.
By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”
A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.
The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.
According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.
In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.
In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”
Reverse transcription
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.
Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”
The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.
The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”
In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”
Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”
Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”
More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-mrna-vaccines-permanently-alter-dna-recent-science-suggests-they-might
Research on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by scientists at Harvard and MIT has implications for how mRNA vaccines could permanently alter genomic DNA, according to Doug Corrigan, Ph.D., a biochemist-molecular biologist who says more research is needed.
Under ordinary circumstances, the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus. The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm, where it provides instructions about which proteins to make.
By comparison, mRNA vaccines send their chemically synthesized mRNA payload (bundled with spike protein-manufacturing instructions) directly into the cytoplasm.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”
A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.
The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”
Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.
According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”
The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.
In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.
In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”
Reverse transcription
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.
Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”
The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.
The authors suggest that while the clinical consequences require further study, detrimental effects are a distinct possibility and — depending on the integrated viral fragments’ “insertion sites in the human genome” and an individual’s underlying health status — could include “a more severe immune response … such as a ‘cytokine storm’ or auto-immune reactions.”
In 2012, a study suggested that viral genome integration could “lead to drastic consequences for the host cell, including gene disruption, insertional mutagenesis and cell death.”
Corrigan makes a point of saying that the pathways hypothesized to facilitate retro-integration of viral — or vaccine — RNA into DNA “are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level.”
Even so, the preprint’s discussion of reverse transcription and genome integration elicited a maelstrom of negative comments from readers unwilling to rethink biological dogma, some of whom even advocated for retraction (though preprints are, by definition, unpublished) on the grounds that “conspiracy theorists … will take this paper to ‘proof’ that mRNA vaccines can in fact alter your genetic code.”
More thoughtful readers agreed with Corrigan that the paper raises important questions. For example, one reader stated that confirmatory evidence is lacking “to show that the spike protein only is expressed for a short amount of time (say 1-3 days) after vaccination,” adding, “We think that this is the case, but there is no evidence for that.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/could-mrna-vaccines-permanently-alter-dna-recent-science-suggests-they-might
3
Rin
2021 Jul 13, 9:25am
Rin
2021 Jul 13, 9:25am
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
What a lot of so-called researchers don't seem to understand, which is actually a simple concept in Applied Chemistry is that of 'residence time'. In general, RNA fragments get rounded up by restriction enzymes & get dissolved into their primary fragments.
This is why we don't make broccoli, sardine, & apple enzymes in our cells. These fragments are converted into food.
So as these Pfizer/Moderna mRNA fragments stay within the cell's cytoplasm for a long time, the reverse transcriptase enzymes start to find 'em and transition them into DNA sections because in a sense, it's temporarily confused between self and non-self.
This is why having a shot, where the mRNA stuff leaks all over the body, instead of simply staying around the injection site of the shoulder's deltoid muscle, is a major disaster. There are so many population groups of mRNA in the liver, kidneys, spleen, etc, that in effect, it becomes a new tenant for our organ systems.
Yes, your body was turned into Section 8 housing for rogue Spike proteins,
As the phrase “reverse transcription” implies, the DNA-to-mRNA pathway is not always a one-way street. Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA, allowing the latter to be integrated into the DNA in the cell nucleus.
Nor is reverse transcription uncommon. Geneticists report that “Over 40% of mammalian genomes comprise the products of reverse transcription.”
The preliminary evidence cited by the Harvard-MIT researchers indicates that endogenous reverse transcriptase enzymes may facilitate reverse transcription of coronavirus RNAs and trigger their integration into the human genome.
What a lot of so-called researchers don't seem to understand, which is actually a simple concept in Applied Chemistry is that of 'residence time'. In general, RNA fragments get rounded up by restriction enzymes & get dissolved into their primary fragments.
This is why we don't make broccoli, sardine, & apple enzymes in our cells. These fragments are converted into food.
So as these Pfizer/Moderna mRNA fragments stay within the cell's cytoplasm for a long time, the reverse transcriptase enzymes start to find 'em and transition them into DNA sections because in a sense, it's temporarily confused between self and non-self.
This is why having a shot, where the mRNA stuff leaks all over the body, instead of simply staying around the injection site of the shoulder's deltoid muscle, is a major disaster. There are so many population groups of mRNA in the liver, kidneys, spleen, etc, that in effect, it becomes a new tenant for our organ systems.
Yes, your body was turned into Section 8 housing for rogue Spike proteins,
4
Patrick
2021 Jul 13, 10:00am
Patrick
2021 Jul 13, 10:00am
@Donald go ahead and trust your life to Fauci.
He's totally not in bed with Big Pharma and you can trust him, right?
He's totally not in bed with Big Pharma and you can trust him, right?
5
zzyzzx
2021 Jul 13, 11:45am
zzyzzx
2021 Jul 13, 11:45am
Donald says
Fake news.
I look at the data. States with high vaccination rates have lower Covid rates than states with low vaccination rates.
Fake news.
6
Onvacation
2021 Jul 13, 11:46am
Onvacation
2021 Jul 13, 11:46am
Donald says
Data? Source? Please?
I look at the data. States with high vaccination rates have lower Covid rates than states with low vaccination rates.
Data? Source? Please?
8
richwicks
2021 Jul 13, 11:49am
richwicks
2021 Jul 13, 11:49am
Patrick says
Maybe we SHOULD go through the trouble of posting Fauci's emails.
@Donald go ahead and trust your life to Fauci.
He's totally not in bed with Big Pharma and you can trust him, right?
Maybe we SHOULD go through the trouble of posting Fauci's emails.
9
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Jul 13, 12:04pm
Al_Sharpton_for_President
2021 Jul 13, 12:04pm
Donald says
States with low vaccine numbers had Covid-19 case rates last week 3 times higher than others where people are fully vaccinatedIt might be helpful to utilize the current CDC breakthrough infection monitoring standard and speak only to hospitlaization and death rates. Not saying they are not significant, just saying to synch up.
10
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 13, 12:12pm
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 13, 12:12pm
Donald says
... as in 3 people in total in "unvaxxed" states vs 1 in "vaxxed". =))
States with low vaccine numbers had Covid-19 case rates last week 3 times higher than others where people are fully vaccinated
... as in 3 people in total in "unvaxxed" states vs 1 in "vaxxed". =))
11
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 13, 12:21pm
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 13, 12:21pm
Donald says
Again? Didn't he already die like 2 months ago?
Anti-vaxxer Colorado sheriff's deputy, 33, dies of COVID complications
Again? Didn't he already die like 2 months ago?
12
richwicks
2021 Jul 27, 3:14pm
richwicks
2021 Jul 27, 3:14pm
Donald says
I don't think anybody here gives a crap what CNN says.
This is Cum-o "bravely emerging from a 2 week quarantine in his basement after getting covid": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRfTABlqGZQ
Oh, and here's also Cum-o out at the Hamptons, during his "quarantine": https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hes-scary-stupid-new-york-cyclist-singled-out-in-chris-cuomo-radio-rant-files-police-report
Not only was Cum-o caught in a total lie, CNN still went through the bullshit story of his emergence from quarantine. Nothing on CNN should be treated as credible. I used to just collect videos of them lying - and if you want a compilation, I'll provide it. I don't understand, at this point, how anybody can reference CNN as a credible news source. If you ever bother to sit through the bullshit of that station, how can you miss the lies? They're propaganda. Do you really not realize that, at this point?
States with low vaccine numbers had Covid-19 case rates last week 3 times higher than others where people are fully vaccinated
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/12/health/us-coronavirus-monday/index.html
I don't think anybody here gives a crap what CNN says.
This is Cum-o "bravely emerging from a 2 week quarantine in his basement after getting covid": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRfTABlqGZQ
Oh, and here's also Cum-o out at the Hamptons, during his "quarantine": https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hes-scary-stupid-new-york-cyclist-singled-out-in-chris-cuomo-radio-rant-files-police-report
Not only was Cum-o caught in a total lie, CNN still went through the bullshit story of his emergence from quarantine. Nothing on CNN should be treated as credible. I used to just collect videos of them lying - and if you want a compilation, I'll provide it. I don't understand, at this point, how anybody can reference CNN as a credible news source. If you ever bother to sit through the bullshit of that station, how can you miss the lies? They're propaganda. Do you really not realize that, at this point?
13
mell
2021 Jul 27, 3:38pm
Onvacation says
There is none, in fact it's fairly random since the agents don't stop covid infections or hospitalizations. However the states with the most natural infections will be the winners as their protection is vastly superior and they don't harbor the risk of ADE.
Donald saysI look at the data. States with high vaccination rates have lower Covid rates than states with low vaccination rates.
Data? Source? Please?
There is none, in fact it's fairly random since the agents don't stop covid infections or hospitalizations. However the states with the most natural infections will be the winners as their protection is vastly superior and they don't harbor the risk of ADE.
14
richwicks
2021 Jul 27, 3:57pm
richwicks
2021 Jul 27, 3:57pm
Hey @Onvacation
Do I have your email? If not, I'll ask Patrick. If I do, can you give me the LAST 3 letters of your email name? I can find it from that.
Do I have your email? If not, I'll ask Patrick. If I do, can you give me the LAST 3 letters of your email name? I can find it from that.
15
Onvacation
2021 Jul 27, 4:28pm
Onvacation
2021 Jul 27, 4:28pm
richwicks says
@patrick
Please give rich my email
Hey @Onvacation
Do I have your email? If not, I'll ask Patrick. If I do, can you give me the LAST 3 letters of your email name? I can find it from that.
@patrick
Please give rich my email
17
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 27, 4:28pm
RWSGFY
2021 Jul 27, 4:28pm
Donald says
Making conclusions based on the sample of one. So scientific!
Oh yes, natural immunity is so vastly superior:
GOP Congressman says he has Covid-19 for second time
Making conclusions based on the sample of one. So scientific!
18
mell
2021 Jul 27, 4:31pm
Donald says
mell saysFake news: "It was unclear whether the earlier infection was confirmed"Lol. Sure thing, plenty of colds and flus out there, everything is counted covid these days. Did you know the vast majority of covid infections show little to no symptoms?Onvacation saysDonald saysI look at the data. States with high vaccination rates have lower Covid rates than states with low vaccination rates.
Data? Source? Please?
There is none, in fact it's fairly random since the agents don't stop covid infections or hospitalizations. However the states with the most natural infections will be the winners as their protection is vastly superior and they don't harbor the risk of ADE.
Oh yes, natural immunity is so vastly superior:
GOP Congressman says he has Covid-19 for second time
https://www.nbcnews.com/politic...
19
Karloff
2021 Jul 27, 4:35pm
Karloff
2021 Jul 27, 4:35pm
Is this taking into account the CDC's recommendation of only counting a breakthrough case in vaccinated people if the person winds up hospitalized AND had covid symptoms AND the CT is <=28 (normally 35-40)?
Come up with criteria to exclude vaccinated people from the data, then be surprised when they aren't in it.
Come up with criteria to exclude vaccinated people from the data, then be surprised when they aren't in it.
20
mell
2021 Jul 27, 4:36pm
Donald says
That's true but the body's t cell and b cell response is vastly superior in recognizing mutations than vaxxines/agents and 99.99% of reinfections are mild or asymptomatic.
There are plenty of other cases:
Dutch woman dies after catching Covid twice:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/13/europe/covid-19-dutch-woman-reinfection-death-intl/index.html
The problem with immunity, whether from prior infections or vaccination is that it does not last forever. Also, if there is a major mutation in the virus, then the effectiveness of prior immunity declines.
That's true but the body's t cell and b cell response is vastly superior in recognizing mutations than vaxxines/agents and 99.99% of reinfections are mild or asymptomatic.
21
Onvacation
2021 Jul 27, 9:45pm
Onvacation
2021 Jul 27, 9:45pm
richwicks says
But I'm on a road trip and not checking that email. Please email me and I will reply when I get home end of next week.
@richwicks
Hey @Onvacation
Do I have your email? If not, I'll ask Patrick. If I do, can you give me the LAST 3 letters of your email name? I can find it from that.
But I'm on a road trip and not checking that email. Please email me and I will reply when I get home end of next week.
@richwicks
A somewhat long video, worth the listen. Cut through the small talk intro and start at 13:24 or thereabouts. And check out the referenced Trusted News Initiative. Chilling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8lTQu8JdFo