6
0

Fraud Evidence Factchecked


 invite response                
2021 Jun 19, 11:39pm   349 views  8 comments

by AmericanKulak   ➕follow (9)   💰tip   ignore  

By McPaper.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/05/29/fact-check-georgia-military-overseas-ballots-not-evidence-fraud/7450430002/

"All 950 military ballots in one batch going for Biden, with every ballot numbered sequentially, is no evidence of fraud"

Comments 1 - 8 of 8        Search these comments

1   GreaterNYCDude   2021 Jun 20, 6:37am  

Two quotes from the article.


focuses on Georgia, where Biden beat incumbent Donald Trump by more than 12,000 votes


And

three audits of the state's election results found no indication of widespread fraud.


Let's think about this.

There were just under 5 million votes cast. With a margin of little more than 12,600 votes. (12,636 to be exact) any fraud need not be widespread to have a profound impact.
2   HeadSet   2021 Jun 20, 8:42am  

An AP photo from the OP article:



There is your AP BS reporting right there. Look at the "BIDEN" and "TRUMP" labels. They were obviously added later to the photo using what looks like Arial Black font. They look like a bad superimpose job since the two words line up perfectly and have a different resolution from the rest of the photo, as well as hard edges. I sure the AP will say something like "added for clarity."
3   Onvacation   2021 Jun 20, 8:44am  

GreaterNYCDude says
found no indication of widespread fraud.

How much fraud did they find?
4   HeadSet   2021 Jun 20, 8:50am  

GreaterNYCDude says
There were just under 5 million votes cast. With a margin of little more than 12,600 votes. (12,636 to be exact) any fraud need not be widespread to have a profound impact.


Correct, it is a word game here. They can say "no proof of wide spread voter fraud" because "wide spread" means the whole state. You can have no "widespread" voter fraud even though there was enough concentrated voter fraud in key areas to sway the election. An honest phrasing would be "Was there enough voter fraud to change the outcome of the election." That is, "Were over 12,000 fraudulent votes discovered?"
5   GreaterNYCDude   2021 Jun 20, 8:59am  

I also love the 'more than 1200 votes' as if that's some huge margin.

It'd a shame we just can't have a redo in 2022. Biden and Trump. Run off election. Let the better candidate win.

Will never happen.

And for the record I'm not a Trump fan... but elections are important enough to get right. If there is no faith in the democratic system, democracy collapses.
6   FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden   2021 Jun 20, 10:21am  

GreaterNYCDude says
I also love the 'more than 1200 votes' as if that's some huge margin.

It'd a shame we just can't have a redo in 2022. Biden and Trump. Run off election. Let the better candidate win.

Will never happen.

And for the record I'm not a Trump fan... but elections are important enough to get right. If there is no faith in the democratic system, democracy collapses.


I don’t think we have democracy. Plutocracy is what we have. Rich pick candidates, rich fund election campaigns. Everything is fucked up because rich like it this way, they are the once funding globohomo shit everywhere.
7   Ceffer   2021 Jun 20, 10:59am  

"Fact checkers show evidence of widespread fraud. They neither check nor do they respect facts. They offer confirmation for propaganda that is patently false."
8   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2021 Jun 20, 12:15pm  

I don’t understand. The “fact checker” hasn’t actually checked anything nor spoken to someone who did. I’ll go a step further and state that unless they asked some of the 950 people from that series of ballots whom they actually voted for(if at all), how can they possibly state the claim of voter fraud is false?

I wish I knew who the person who wrote the USA Today article was. They seem to be extremely disingenuous.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions